Script: The “nightmare scenario” for inflation starts with growth much poorer than the administration’s forecasts, possibly due to larger government distortions and higher tax rates. Lower growth is the single most important danger to the Federal budget. Then, the government may have to make good on its many credit guarantees, and continue its string of bailouts. If this happens, prospective deficit to GDP ratios will rise much further than current projections suggest. When investors see that path coming, they will quite suddenly bail out of the dollar; we will see a dramatic rise in interest rates, a fall of the dollar, and large inflation — and quite possibly “stagflation” not inflation associated with a boom.
http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.co ... nceton.pdf
===========================================================================
Higgenbotham
The Fed can't guarantee any of this mess. Once investors get nervous about what the Fed can and can't do, at some point the credit and stock markets will panic. I'm guessing August on that, but who knows.
============================================================================
Dollar: In this analysis, we can read the government’s actions as a much modified version of Friedman and Schwartz’s advice for the great depression. In that event, the Fed failed to accommodate a demand for money at the expense of government debt. In this one the government recognized and accommodated a massive demand for both money and government debt at the expense of private debt.
Current: Conveyance of Gold EU tonnage sales. History does convey that Currency is the true safety valve to relive economic stress.
http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRe ... dChannel=0
It was plain to the eye who seen what and when to debt stabilization. Namely influx basket currencys.
http://dallasfed.org/research/eclett/2009/el0904.html
Taming the Credit Cycle by Limiting High-Risk Lending by Jeffery W. Gunther
This as a taxpayer simply put is the problem and why they should follow the debt to logical conclusion of timely terminations from the top down hence the true reform ensues. Given the extent to avarice they will never let it be so in the vein of atypical Syndicalism stays veiled from public discernment and will be rendered for purpose of Capital and Labor Responsibilities systemic misnomers. The encyclical Quaddragesimo anno 1931 contained passages which could but need not to date be interpreted as an endorsement of corporativism. The relevance to be seen is in a historical context of view is then it only lasted a few years and will be a simple addition to human action of governance expediencies to delay proper supply chain metrics. Minsky elaborated to the capital management ideologues and precursors of fund capital movements.
Most of the Administration’s defense of fiscal stimulus (For example Bernstein and Romer 2009) cites simple Keynesian flow multipliers, not the sort of fiscal-monetary inflation I have described as “stimulus.” And by May, these simple positive multipliers turned in to a widespread worry about fiscal sustainability and can be read as dramatically negative multipliers. For example, the CEA’s (2009) analysis of the Administration health proposal states that “slowing the growth rate of health care costs will prevent disastrous increases in the Federal budget deficit” and will raise the level of GDP by 8%, permanently. Secretary Geithner went out of his way to assure the Chinese that the dollar will not be inflated (Cha 2009). In sum, government statements do not paint a clear picture. This may reflect an understandable indecision on the part of the government facing a Catch-22: In this analysis, the only way to “stimulate” is to commit forcefully and credibly to an unsustainable fiscal path, so that people will try to get rid of all their government debt including money, and in so doing drive up demand for goods, services, and real assets. But the government clearly understands that such an action trades modest stimulus today for financial and economic chaos when the inflation really comes. Faced with that stark decision, it is not surprising that the government settles for half-measures, wishful thinking and contradictory statements — as the Japanese were accused of doing for a decade. Insert debt to GDP ratio here to the G-20 over 30 years.
Net result:
http://www.piie.com/publications/pb/pb09-10.pdf
What is clear, however, is that after the highly appropriate effective appreciation, it is important that China changes its peg from the dollar to a basket to stabilize the effective rate.
A fundamental equilibrium exchange rate (FEER) is defined as an exchange rate that is expected to be indefinitely sustainable on the basis of existing policies. It should therefore be one that is expected to generate a current account surplus or deficit that matches the country’s underlying capital flow over the cycle, assuming that the country is pursuing internal balance as well as it can and that it is not restricting trade for balance of-payments reasons.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/econ ... ollar.html
Current : Until we see another five years' of evidence over whether China is a more consumer-driven economy, becoming bigger and bigger, and whether the euro can have a successful second decade, the dollar looks set to remain dominant." China has made some hints about loosening its hold over the yuan in recent months, but these are only early maneuvers. A second step would be to allow the yuan to become a part of the SDR – whose own value is determined by those of a basket of currencies including the dollar, pound and euro.
Quo Vadis?: Laborem exercens
Thus, the principle of the priority of labour over capital is a postulate of the order of social morality. It has key importance both in the system built on the principle of private ownership of the means of production and also in the system in which private ownership of these means has been limited even in a radical way. Labour is in a sense inseparable from capital; in no way does it accept the antinomy, that is to say, the separation and opposition with regard to the means of production that has weighed upon human life in recent centuries as a result of merely economic premises.
Such a vision of the values of human work, or in other words such a spirituality of work, fully explains what we read in the same section of the Council's Pastoral Constitution with regard to the right meaning of progress: "A person is more precious for what he is than for what he has. Similarly, that entire people do to obtain greater justice, wider brotherhood, and a more humane ordering of social relationships has greater worth than technical advances. For these advances can supply the material for human progress, but of themselves alone they can never actually bring it about".
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_ ... en.html#-D
To separate the cause and the cure is only hindered by values which to date followed to logical conclusions do tell of its rate of malinvestment “oversupply” and intent in multiple terms of true regard of its classed inertia in time. The customer must decide who produces what and focus capital movements.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_x ... um_en.html
To sum up, then, We may lay it down as a general and lasting law that working men's associations should be so organized and governed as to furnish the best and most suitable means for attaining what is aimed at, that is to say, for helping each individual member to better his condition to the utmost in body, soul, and property. It is clear that they must pay special and chief attention to the duties of religion and morality, and that social betterment should have this chiefly in view; otherwise they would lose wholly their special character, and end by becoming little better than those societies which take no account whatever of religion. The arrow of time properly indicates who omits relevance to the common good. It has been said give to the authorities without malice since it is not the most important thing in life and I agree to the extent we must and are hidebound to hold them accountable. The differences in direction of that arrow are no different in any time. We were clearly told what it would bring. Abraham’s seed has no excuses as in the three pillars we see today to freedom’s regard to stability. The dead letter proscribed a viable path to reason since the lack of it is the definition of hell.
