Swine Flu Pandemic - Preparation

Learning about and preparing for what now appears to be the "Great H1N1 Swine Flu Pandemic of 2009"
aedens
Posts: 4753
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 4:13 pm

Re: Swine Flu Pandemic

Post by aedens »

Witchiepoo wrote:
aedens wrote:I work as a resident doctor in one of the biggest hospitals in Mexico City and sadly, the situation is far from "under control". As a doctor, I realise that the media does not report the truth. Authorities distributed vaccines among all the medical personnel with no results, because two of my partners who worked in this hospital (interns) were killed by this new virus in less than six days even though they were vaccinated as all of us were. The official number of deaths is 20, nevertheless, the true number of victims are more than 200. I understand that we must avoid to panic, but telling the truth it might be better now to prevent and avoid more deaths.
Yeny Gregorio Dávila, Mexico City

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/8018428.stm

In there words.... This has been going on from other reports I have not posted for longer than we are seeing...
What were you guys vaccinated with? From what I've heard they have a swine flu vaccine for pigs, but not humans.
This was a conveyances from those at somewhat ground zero. I know the best pathogen sample would be from them once sorted.
We clearly understand the Centers situation and the link was supplied so your staff can identify the cells
possible mutagen adaptation rate scale. Sort the context out. Find Yeny in Mexico and see what is and what is not since we know data is fragile.
Last edited by aedens on Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Witchiepoo
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:20 am

Re: Swine Flu Pandemic

Post by Witchiepoo »

ainsleyclare wrote:Last I heard, the Powers that Be aren't anything as a "swine flu" vaccine for humans- they are being very clear that there will be no vaccine against this new strain of influenza for many months (September?).
That's why I wondered what the heck was going on in Mexico. (Someone on this thread said they were trying to vaccinate people against it.)
I've tried to find any support for the concept that there is "a swine flu vaccine for pigs but not for humans", and couldn't find any.
If that's the case, the CDC, might want to update their website:
Vaccines are available to be given to pigs to prevent swine influenza. There is no vaccine to protect humans from swine flu.
To be clear, I talking about pigs getting vaccinated for other strains of swine flu, which they do regularly.
Another issue: the name of this virus. The communications I've seen today are describing it as "swine-origin influenza virus" rather than swine flu. I guess the term "swine flu" would indicate that it primarily infects pigs, and since this new H1N1 flu virus is circulating among human populations, the term "swine flu" is misleading.
Or it could be an example of mixing politics and science, which I see as potentially dangerous and even quasi-ethical. (No personal offense intended or anything.)

John
Posts: 11485
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Henry Niman interview

Post by John »

In my first note in this thread, I mentioned the name Henry Niman.
Niman had a lengthy interview where he discussed the situation.
Here are the links:

** Article:
http://www.recombinomics.com/News/04290 ... mic_5.html

** Summary of video
http://www.wpxi.com/health/19315326/detail.html

** Actual video
http://www.wpxi.com/video/19313969/index.html

Here are my notes from the 26 minute video:
Dr. Henry Niman wrote:

> It's a swine virus like 1918.

> 1/3 of the worl'ds population got infected in 1918-9. 3% of the
> people who got infected died.

> In 1918 followed the pattern it's following right now. Started
> in late spring, very mild, disappeared in the summer, and then it
> reemerged in the fall. That's when most of the deaths were.

> The at-risk group was previously healthy young adults. It
> attacked their immune system. That's what happened in Mexico.
> Most of the deaths in Mexico have been between the ages of 25-44.
> 1:50

> They took a typical path -- they were fine for 2-3 days, then it
> took a turn - atypical pneumonia - and then 10% died.

> There's no difference in the H1N1 virus in Mexico vs US. The
> difference is probably a timing issue -- they started in Jan,
> Feb. We're trailing them. We would have to have as many cases as
> in Mexico city, and then there'll be as many deaths. 3:35

> The virus may seem to disappear over the summer -- tho it may
> cause problems in the southern hemisphere. 3:50

> It's just been a few days since it entered the US, and now it's
> been spreading around the US rapidly. 5:00

> It's still mild, so even in Mexico, and the number of pneumonia
> cases is 2,000, and the number of deaths is around 150, about 10%.
> There are probably 200,000 cases in Mexico, so the vast majority
> today, have a fairly mild course, for today's early, mild form of
> the virus.

> The vaccine seed stocks are being made right now. So to get the
> vaccine, the seeds have to be grown to a large level. 10:20

> What's currently available are Rolenza and Tamiflu. The problem
> is that seasonal flu H1N1 is resistant to Tamiflu, and so as the
> virus moves thru the human population, including the southern
> hemisphere, it will interact with the seasonal h1n1, which is
> tamiflu resistant, and there's a good chance that the resistance
> will transfer over to the swine flu. So in the fall, the virus
> that emerges will probably be Tamiflu and Rolenza resistant.
> 11:40

> It's early - and we won't know for a while whether it follows the
> 1918 pattern. The virus is recombinant between human seasonal
> h1n1 and swine flu h1n1, the same as in 1918 -- the timing is the
> same, and the target populations are the same.

> There's going to be a very intensive vaccine effort, and the
> virus will be intensively watched.

> Most at-risk group will be healthy adults -- have a strong,
> response immune response, and it's the immune response that
> actually kills the patient.

> The very old and the very young don't have the strong response,
> and they're more likely to survive.

> Same virus in Mexico and US - so will be as severe. 20:56
Niman described the typical path of those who get sick: It seems OK
for 2-3 days, but then the patient develops pneumonia. This is most
dangerous for people in the 25-44 year old range, because these
people have strong immune systems. The disease creates a "cytokine
storm": the person's lungs overreact by generating a "storm" of
cytokines, chemicals that are produced by the immune system. The
stronger the immune system, the greater the overreaction, and the
more cytokines that are produced. The result is that the cytokines
flood the lungs and make breathing impossible. The very young and
the very old are less likely to die, because their immune systems
aren't as good.

According to Niman, there are three ways in which the current virus
is following the same path as the 1918 virus:
  • Virus: It's the same kind of H1N1 swine virus.
  • Timing: It's only starting to spread late in the flu season, and
    it's very mild. (It actually started in Mexico in January or
    February, and only now is spreading worldwide.) The 1918 flu was
    very mild in the spring and summer, but became much more dangerous in
    the Fall.
  • Target demographic: 25-44 year olds, in 1918, and today.
It's very hard to get information about this situation, because
politicians are concerned more about avoiding panic, and
organizations like the CDC and WHO are under orders to play down the
threat. So it's impossible to be sure what's going on.

It seems to me that people should be stocking up on food and water,
and be prepared to say at home for a week or two.

Also, businesses should be preparing to be ordered to shut down.
That's what's happened in Mexico City, and there could well be the
same thing in New York and other large cities.

What percentages do we assign to these potential events? I get the
impression that a worldwide pandemic in the next month or so is close
to a certainty, although it may not cause a lot a deaths. But it
will shut down businesses and force people to stay at home.

What's the probability of a real 1918-like catastrophe in the Fall?
I get the impression that the probability is around 10-15% -- and
that figure is based on nothing but a gut feel. Still, a 15% chance
of catastrophe is a pretty high number.

Sincerely,

John

John
Posts: 11485
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Swine Flu Pandemic

Post by John »

Here's a graph of the timeline of the 1918 Spanish flu attack:

Image

http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no01/05-0979.htm

There were three waves, the worst wave occurring in the Fall.

John

ainsleyclare
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 4:22 pm

Re: Swine Flu Pandemic

Post by ainsleyclare »

Very nice analysis, John!

One big difference between now and 1918: we expect to have a vaccine ready before the next (2010) flu season really kicks in.

Witchiepoo
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:20 am

Re: Swine Flu Pandemic

Post by Witchiepoo »

Although if the virus keeps changing, vaccines could be irrelevant, because we will constantly be playing catch-up.

ainsleyclare
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 4:22 pm

Re: Swine Flu Pandemic

Post by ainsleyclare »

The seasonal flu vaccine each year provides some protection, if not complete protection, from the most common circulating strains of the virus. It is very rare for the vaccine to be completely ineffective. We are in one of those rare situations right now. Please read again my explanation of how the flu virus changes slowly most of the time, and a whole lot evey once and a while.

John
Posts: 11485
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Swine Flu Pandemic

Post by John »

Dear Ainsley,
ainsleyclare wrote: > One big difference between now and 1918: we expect to have a
> vaccine ready before the next (2010) flu season really kicks in.

> The seasonal flu vaccine each year provides some protection, if
> not complete protection, from the most common circulating strains
> of the virus. It is very rare for the vaccine to be completely
> ineffective. We are in one of those rare situations right now.
> Please read again my explanation of how the flu virus changes
> slowly most of the time, and a whole lot evey once and a while.
It's really hard for me to see how a vaccine could make much
difference.

Let's assume the best scenario: A vaccine is developed by September,
and it's still effective against whatever mutated virus emerges in the
Fall.

Then you're still talking about a world with 6.5 billion people, and
I doubt that more than 1-2% of them could be vaccinated before the
flu season begins. So we're still talking about huge worldwide
mortality.

Sincerely,

John

Witchiepoo
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:20 am

Re: Swine Flu Pandemic

Post by Witchiepoo »

Isn't a slow change in a flu virus enough to render a vaccine ineffective?

Also, my intuition is that the large number of deaths in Mexico City, or near the now infamous pig farm, is due to poor air quality and other environmental factors. Having just visited India, well, it's hard to imagine how people even live in large "third world" cities with such quantities of air pollution.

So I guess my point is that if it hits a place like Mumbai, forget it.

Witchiepoo
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:20 am

Re: Swine Flu Pandemic

Post by Witchiepoo »

Another concern I have is that political pressure to push out a vaccine in time for the fall will result in something potentially damaging being injected into millions of people.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests