Obama is our elected representative, head of state, commander in chief, etc.. You know, The buck stops here guy.
But the buck never stops with him. He hates everything this country has ever stood for. He despises the individuality
of our nation and the citizens and immigrants who took the opportunities afforded to those who acted and took risks
to build a great physical expression of creative philosophy. He casts blame on everyone who is opposed to his ideology.
He refuses to accept blame on any level. Obama consistently seeks out the least defendable person or group to accuse
of wrong doing. Conservatives, the Rich, unseen videos, acting stupidly.... Whites who disagree with him are racists, heterosexuals
who disagree with him are bigots, blacks opposed are traitors to the cause. There is a clear slant to this administrations agenda
and if one cannot see that they are naive and have a blind-sided sucker punch coming in their future.
Times are tense and getting more and more unstable. When and environment is under great stress the organisms within become agitated and behave
more and more irrationally. Aberrant behavior is becoming more common around the world. Look at China where private gun ownership is forbidden.
The use of knives, machetes, and even screwdrivers are being uses almost weekly in attacks on children. We are close to a tipping point.
to borrow the inspiration of Niemoller: First they came for the Rich, Then they came for the taxpayers, then they came for the laws, then they came form the teachers, then they came for the merchants, then they came for the books, then they came for the excess,.................And when I had nothing left they declared me equal and set me to work.
Every Tyrant needs a scapegoat. Obama has the luxury of 150 million useful idiots to do his bidding until they become less useful. He is certainly going to be redrawing the lines of tyrannical precedence. In Germany it was primarily a race war with targeting an easy victim in the Jewish community. Obama is going to target people based on race, class, wealth, religion,thoughts, speech, ability, ambition, and anything else he can use to divide and destroy this nations ability to prosper. I think Mao and Stalin are the most likely comparatives for division and creating "change" within a system and or culture. Possibly Nicolae Ceaușescu is a good partner as well: "...was a maverick and despotic Rumanian Communist leader who pursued an independent course abroad and demanded slavish subservience at home."
http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/refere ... index.html
As John points out, this administrations transparity and agenda is demonstrated by rewarding crooked bankers with small fines in relation to the gross amounts of profits made on illegal and immoral operations, instead of sending them to prison or publicly executing them as the French would have done in years past. People who choose to live in a hole end up getting buried in that hole. Putting your head in the sand leaves a vulnerable spot quite exposed.
In a society where the working are demonized and the educated are scrutinized, when the criminal is glorified and rewarded, the law abiding is restrained, the entitled encouraged to take more, the disenfranchised will either rise up and rebel, get distracted by a magnificent diversion of energy, or they will roll over and play along to get along. I see a magnificent distraction on the horizon which will lead to an attempted disarmament of the public which will result in the desired social rebellion and lead to more desired oppression if not the abolishing of the Constitution in the "interest of public safety and the nation."