vincecate wrote:I do not contend that people instantly cut the value of dollars in exactly half if you exactly double the number of dollars. It could be less, or it could be much more. If people decide that is the beginning of a trend and that the number of dollars will be doubling again and again they might bail on dollars after the first doubling. Value is determined by the market using supply and demand.
Also, there is usually a delay, on the order of 2 years, between when the money supply goes up and when the price inflation hits.
http://pair.offshore.ai/38yearcycle/#delay
As you've noted (referring to the realization by the market that a means exists by which the supply of gold could be increased at no cost), Bernanke said the following in the helicopter drop speech:
"Presumably, the potentially unlimited supply of cheap gold would cause the market price of gold to plummet. Indeed, if the market for gold is to any degree efficient, the price of gold would collapse immediately after the announcement of the invention, before the alchemist had produced and marketed a single ounce of yellow metal."
Bernanke similarly predicted that there would likely be an immediate market reaction to the news that a monetary authority is planning to expand the supply of dollars. He further states:
"By increasing the number of U.S. dollars in circulation, or even by credibly threatening to do so, the U.S. government can also reduce the value of a dollar in terms of goods and services, which is equivalent to raising the prices in dollars of those goods and services. We conclude that, under a paper-money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending and hence positive inflation."
Bernanke also implies but does not state as directly as in the reference to gold that by "credibly threatening" to increase the number of US dollars in circulation, he can provoke an immediate market reaction. But he leaves open the possibility that if that does not happen, a deflation can still be reversed anyway:
"If we do fall into deflation, however, we can take comfort that the logic of the printing press example must assert itself, and sufficient injections of money will ultimately always reverse a deflation."
My summation of this and prediction in a nutshell:
Had Bernanke been correct, the initial evidence of market anticipation of inflation should have been seen in the exchange rate of the dollar. It would be expected that higher prices of imports (especially with higher prices then moving into other areas) would lag that initial evidence and there would be some resulting inflation.
The dollar did fall somewhat through 2009 as Bernanke had indirectly predicted, then it reversed in late 2009 and is back up near 2 year highs. Commodity prices lagged a bit as would be expected and oil and copper prices, for example, hit their highs this year before reversing.
As the sovereign dominoes in Europe began to topple, the US was given some breathing room in the government debt market as there was a "flight to quality" on a relative basis. It's likely that honeymoon will soon be over and US government bond rates will begin to rise as the US becomes like any other nearly bankrupt sovereign and the dominoes continue to roll. That will nail the second half of the coffin shut as far as having any further immediately easy and painless ability to generate inflation and "growth" goes, as ability to service the debt becomes the issue and further borrowing is out of the question.
Compounding this problem will likely be a widening of credit spreads back out toward 2008 crisis levels, which will have the effect of choking the economy harder than ever under the pressure of the increased debt load. Corporate profits and the stock market will likely plummet to below Q4 2008 levels (in other words, the S&P 500 as a whole will be losing money again). Unemployment will likely soar, but this time there will be no means for the government to borrow 10% of GDP as a placeholder and GDP will drop like a stone.
The country will get into anything can happen mode as there will be utter panic.
A second iteration of QE in a panic environment like this seems doubtful. To think that Bernanke or his policies will have any currency at that point seems unlikely because they will be considered to have failed. What seems more likely is that the private sector will tell the public sector to get their act together and cut spending. Things may get violent. Bernanke may get thrown out. Incumbents will get voted out.
My best guess is that by the end of this year, you will not recognize the United States of America. A corollary to that is there won't be much time to be posting on this forum because survival will take precedence over other activities.
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.