Generational Dynamics |
|
Forecasting America's Destiny ... and the World's | |
HOME WEB LOG COUNTRY WIKI COMMENT FORUM DOWNLOADS ABOUT | |
And Saudi Arabia and China plan to invest in Citibank, as writedowns increase.
Last August, hundreds of anxious investors panicked and mobbed the banks owned by Countrywide Financial Corp., demanding to withdraw their deposits, for fear that Countrywide would go bankrupt. The fears arose after Countrywide had drawn down its $11.5 billion credit lines, for fear that those credit lines would become unavailable.
A week later, Bank of America invested $2 billion in Countrywide in return for 16% ownership of the company.
Countrywide's problems in August were attributed to the worldwide "credit crunch" that occurred at that time. The credit crunch has eased considerably since then, thanks to massive amounts of liquidity being poured into the financial system by the Fed, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, and other central banks.
But Countrywide's problems haven't abated. And no surprise -- Countrywide has been the leader in encouraging abusive use of credit in the last five years, having approved millions of "liar loans" to people with no income, no assets, no honesty, and no chance of making the payments after the initial "teaser" rates expire.
Countrywide reported its first loss in 25 years in the third quarter. Early this week, Countrywide admitted that its foreclosures and late payments on its mortgages hit a record high in December. Foreclosures were at double the level of December 2006, and overdue loans were 50% higher. This announcement caused Countrywide's stock to plummet, meaning that Bank of America has already lost a substantial part of the $2 billion investment that it made in August.
What's the solution?
On Friday, Bank of America agreed to acquire Countrywide completely for another $4 billion.
Is this "throwing good money after bad"? I have little doubt that it is. The WSJ says that it's "a gamble that the U.S. housing crisis is near a bottom and that Countrywide's assets won't further deteriorate," two assumptions that are both bound to be wrong. On the other hand, $4 billion is a cheap price for a company that was worth over $20 billion just a year ago, so perhaps there's enough of a cushion in there to make the deal worthwhile over the (very) long haul.
Countrywide's assets are bound to deteriorate further because the assets of almost every major financial institution continue to deteriorate.
Take Citibank for example. They're going to announce their fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday, and they're expected to be sharply lower.
Recall that Citibank tried to save itself by means of a fraudulent scheme known as a "Master-Liquidity Enhancement Conduit (M-LEC)." Under the scheme, Citibank and other banks would sell worthless CDOs to each other at inflated prices, in order to establish a phony "market price" for the CDOs. Citibank's fraudulent M-LEC idea didn't take off, forcing the bank to take $16.4 billion in writeoffs of worthless CDOs after all. Citibank might have gone bankrupt except that it was saved by a $7.5 billion investment by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority.
Well, now the expectation is that Citibank is going to have to take even more writeoffs -- perhaps as much as $19 billion more -- to be announced along with the earnings statement on Tuesday.
At the same time, it's been reported that Citibank (actually Citigroup) is looking for new investments totalling $14 billion. The investments are to come from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal and from the China Development Bank.
It upsets us to see Bank of America throwing good money after bad, but we don't feel so much pain when it's foreign investors throwing good money after bad.
If you look at the big picture of what's going on in the world, what we're seeing is a corporate version of the Principle of Maximum Ruin.
This is a principle that I've discussed several times on this web site with respect to individual investors. It means that people will keep investing in the stock market until they lose everything - the maximum number of people will be ruined to the maximum extent possible.
What we're seeing now is a corporate version of the same principle.
Recall that the amount of money in the world is decreasing every day. This is because investors and institutions are becoming more and more risk aversion with credit. It's credit that creates money, and it's the abusive use of credit that's created the liquidity bubble that we've been living in the past few years.
But it all turned around in August. At that time, there was a massive shift in the attitudes and behaviors of great masses of investors, and they became much more risk-averse. With the use of credit being reduced, the amount of liquidity in the world is being reduced.
When low tide pulls the water from the shore back into the lake or ocean, it leaves behind little pools of water called "tide pools." Those tide pools don't last long, since they're drained away by leaks in the sand beneath them, but they exist for a while, and they often trap a variety of sea creatures with them.
Well, as the liquidity of the world pulls back and disappears, it leaves behind these liquidity tide pools -- in corporate coffers, but also in places like Saudia Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Singapore or Beijing. But the liquidity tide pools soon leak away, just as the water tide pools do.
The sizes of these country liquidity tide pools are listed on the US Treasury web site. Here's a listing of the most current posting:
Country Amount (billions of dollars) --------------------- ---------------------------- Japan 591.8 China, Mainland 388.1 United Kingdom 296.5 Oil Exporters 130.3 Brazil 112.8 Carib Bnkng Ctrs 78.1 Luxembourg 70.1 Hong Kong 54.2 Taiwan 53.4 Germany 44.1 Korea 43.3 Singapore 35.9 Mexico 33.2 Switzerland 31.7 Turkey 26.5 Canada 21.4 Thailand 20.0 Netherlands 19.5 Sweden 15.3 Russia 14.9 France 14.7 India 13.7 Italy 13.6 Ireland 13.1 Poland 12.3 Belgium 11.3 Israel 10.2 All Other 139.5 --------------------- ---------------------------- Grand Total 2309.5
It seems like $2.3 trillion may seem like a lot of money, but remember that even mainstream analysts says that bank asset writedowns will cause a loss of $2 trillion in credit. When you consider that there are hundreds of trillions of dollars in credit derivatives in the world, $2.3 trillion is a drop in the bucket.
So these liquidity tide pools are not all that big in the grand scheme of things, and what we're going to see more and more is that these tide pools of liquidity will leak away, as the money is used to buy stakes in Citibank, or other investments -- in other words, by throwing good money after bad.
Thus, the Principle of Maximum Ruin will end up applying to Saudi princes and Chinese bankers as well as Main Street investors.
From the point of view of Generational Dynamics, there's a
generational panic and crash coming, and it will be an equal
opportunity financial destroyer.
(13-Jan-08)
Permanent Link
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail
Donate to Generational Dynamics via PayPal
Web Log Summary - 2016
Web Log Summary - 2015
Web Log Summary - 2014
Web Log Summary - 2013
Web Log Summary - 2012
Web Log Summary - 2011
Web Log Summary - 2010
Web Log Summary - 2009
Web Log Summary - 2008
Web Log Summary - 2007
Web Log Summary - 2006
Web Log Summary - 2005
Web Log Summary - 2004
Web Log - December, 2016
Web Log - November, 2016
Web Log - October, 2016
Web Log - September, 2016
Web Log - August, 2016
Web Log - July, 2016
Web Log - June, 2016
Web Log - May, 2016
Web Log - April, 2016
Web Log - March, 2016
Web Log - February, 2016
Web Log - January, 2016
Web Log - December, 2015
Web Log - November, 2015
Web Log - October, 2015
Web Log - September, 2015
Web Log - August, 2015
Web Log - July, 2015
Web Log - June, 2015
Web Log - May, 2015
Web Log - April, 2015
Web Log - March, 2015
Web Log - February, 2015
Web Log - January, 2015
Web Log - December, 2014
Web Log - November, 2014
Web Log - October, 2014
Web Log - September, 2014
Web Log - August, 2014
Web Log - July, 2014
Web Log - June, 2014
Web Log - May, 2014
Web Log - April, 2014
Web Log - March, 2014
Web Log - February, 2014
Web Log - January, 2014
Web Log - December, 2013
Web Log - November, 2013
Web Log - October, 2013
Web Log - September, 2013
Web Log - August, 2013
Web Log - July, 2013
Web Log - June, 2013
Web Log - May, 2013
Web Log - April, 2013
Web Log - March, 2013
Web Log - February, 2013
Web Log - January, 2013
Web Log - December, 2012
Web Log - November, 2012
Web Log - October, 2012
Web Log - September, 2012
Web Log - August, 2012
Web Log - July, 2012
Web Log - June, 2012
Web Log - May, 2012
Web Log - April, 2012
Web Log - March, 2012
Web Log - February, 2012
Web Log - January, 2012
Web Log - December, 2011
Web Log - November, 2011
Web Log - October, 2011
Web Log - September, 2011
Web Log - August, 2011
Web Log - July, 2011
Web Log - June, 2011
Web Log - May, 2011
Web Log - April, 2011
Web Log - March, 2011
Web Log - February, 2011
Web Log - January, 2011
Web Log - December, 2010
Web Log - November, 2010
Web Log - October, 2010
Web Log - September, 2010
Web Log - August, 2010
Web Log - July, 2010
Web Log - June, 2010
Web Log - May, 2010
Web Log - April, 2010
Web Log - March, 2010
Web Log - February, 2010
Web Log - January, 2010
Web Log - December, 2009
Web Log - November, 2009
Web Log - October, 2009
Web Log - September, 2009
Web Log - August, 2009
Web Log - July, 2009
Web Log - June, 2009
Web Log - May, 2009
Web Log - April, 2009
Web Log - March, 2009
Web Log - February, 2009
Web Log - January, 2009
Web Log - December, 2008
Web Log - November, 2008
Web Log - October, 2008
Web Log - September, 2008
Web Log - August, 2008
Web Log - July, 2008
Web Log - June, 2008
Web Log - May, 2008
Web Log - April, 2008
Web Log - March, 2008
Web Log - February, 2008
Web Log - January, 2008
Web Log - December, 2007
Web Log - November, 2007
Web Log - October, 2007
Web Log - September, 2007
Web Log - August, 2007
Web Log - July, 2007
Web Log - June, 2007
Web Log - May, 2007
Web Log - April, 2007
Web Log - March, 2007
Web Log - February, 2007
Web Log - January, 2007
Web Log - December, 2006
Web Log - November, 2006
Web Log - October, 2006
Web Log - September, 2006
Web Log - August, 2006
Web Log - July, 2006
Web Log - June, 2006
Web Log - May, 2006
Web Log - April, 2006
Web Log - March, 2006
Web Log - February, 2006
Web Log - January, 2006
Web Log - December, 2005
Web Log - November, 2005
Web Log - October, 2005
Web Log - September, 2005
Web Log - August, 2005
Web Log - July, 2005
Web Log - June, 2005
Web Log - May, 2005
Web Log - April, 2005
Web Log - March, 2005
Web Log - February, 2005
Web Log - January, 2005
Web Log - December, 2004
Web Log - November, 2004
Web Log - October, 2004
Web Log - September, 2004
Web Log - August, 2004
Web Log - July, 2004
Web Log - June, 2004