*** 2-Jul-14 World View -- Ukraine's forces assault pro-Russian separatists as cease-fire ends
This morning's key headlines from GenerationalDynamics.com
- Ukraine's forces assault pro-Russian separatists as cease-fire ends
- China's neighbors react to new South China Sea claims
- In face of China's increased aggression, Japan reinterprets its constitution
****
**** Ukraine's forces assault pro-Russian separatists as cease-fire ends
****
Petro Poroshenko visits the Ukrainian troops last week (AP)
Both Ukraine government forces and pro-Russian separatists in ease
Ukraine appear to be digging in for a protracted conflict, as a dozen
or so people were killed on Tuesday in firefights between the two
groups. The government forces began an assault on the pro-Russian
separatist positions after Ukraine's president Petro Poroshenko called
an end to a 10 day old cease-fire.
Poroshenko had declared a unilateral 7-day cease-fire on June 20, and
then extended it for three more days. However, during the cease-fire,
Russian-led forces continued attacking Ukrainian fixed positions,
killing dozens of Ukrainian soldiers. At the same time, U.S. and Nato
intelligence ascertained that during the unilateral cease-fire, Russia
transferred additional tanks, armored personnel carriers,
anti-aircraft guns and other hardware to the Russian-backed fighters.
Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, is a war criminal providing
supplies of heavy weapons to Syria's president Bashar al-Assad to
conduct his "industrial strength" torture and extermination of
civilians. Putin has no ethics or morals, and in Ukraine was playing
the usual game of calling for peaceful negotiations, using the time to
rearm his troops. Putin and European leaders all were pressuring
Poroshenko to extend the cease-fire past June 30, but he was receiving
a great deal of internal pressure not to force his own armed forces to
stand still as sitting ducks for Russian-supplied weapons.
On Tuesday, Poroshenko gave a nationally televised speech ending the
cease-fire:
<QUOTE>"After a June 30 evening meeting of the the National
Security and Defense Council of Ukraine I, as Commander-in-Chief,
have decided not to pursue a unilateral cease-fire.
Protection of the territorial integrity of Ukraine, safety and
life of civilians requires not only defensive but also offensive
operations against terrorist militants.
The Armed Forces, National Guard, the State Border Guard Service,
Security Service have received appropriate instructions. ...
We will attack and liberate our land. Non-renewal of the ceasefire
- is our response to terrorists, rebels, looters, and to all those
who are making fun of civilians, who are paralyzing the work of
regional economy, who steal the payments of salaries, pensions,
stipends, who undermine and destroy railroad plumbing, who have
deprived people of normal, peaceful life. ...
Everyone who stood in the way of armed resistance to lawful
authority, but realizing that mistake and wants to correct it, as
president, I guarantee FAILURE to justice. Condition One -
voluntarily lay down their arms."<END QUOTE>
Vladimir Putin responded as follows:
<QUOTE>"Unfortunately, President Poroshenko has taken the
decision to resume military actions, and we – meaning myself and
my colleagues in Europe – could not convince him that the way to
reliable, firm and long-term peace can’t lie through the war.
So far, Petro Poroshenko had no direct relation to orders to take
military action. Now he has taken on this responsibility in
full. Not only military, but also political, more importantly.
Everything that’s going on in Ukraine is of course the internal
business of the Ukrainian government, but we are painfully sorry
that people die, civilians."<END QUOTE>
Given his support of torture and genocide in Syria, I doubt very much
that Putin is "painfully sorry" that civilians die. Also, there has
been no confirmation that his "colleagues in Europe" agreed with his
version of the discussions. Australian Broadcasting and Jamestown and Voice of Russia and Ukraine's government (Trans)
****
**** China's neighbors react to new South China Sea claims
****
President Obama's recent visit to Asia was, like many of his foreign
trips, supposed to reduce hostilities and encourage peaceful
negotiations, especially between China and its neighbors. Instead, it
seems to have encouraged China to more aggressively assert its claims
to the entire South China Sea, including regions that have
historically belonged to Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia, Indonesia, Taiwan
and the Philippines. China is building a network of airstrips and
military garrisons in the South China Sea in clear violation of
international law.
China has updated its famous "nine-dash map," which depicts its
sovereignty over the entire South China Sea with a new
map that signals China's treatment of its territorial claims
as a "core interest," meaning that any compromise in the South
China Sea would be equivalent to giving away a part of mainland
China. This is consistent with China's repeated statements
indicating that it will annex the entire South China Sea and
declare war on anyone that tries to stop them.
A web site reader recently wrote the following:
<QUOTE>"Mr. Xenakis, you sir are very good in your craft. I
may not have heard or read about most of the international
incidents here in your column, but your articulation about China's
strong-armed annexation of a string of islets and shoals belonging
to the Philippines is a fact I can definitely affirm myself. Proof
is that one of these shoals, Panatag shoal and the seas
surrounding it, has been a common fishing ground of my ancestors
even before WW2. Now this area is surrounded by hundreds of large
Chinese fishing trawlers, sucking everything from a grain-sized
shrimp to giant, 10-pounder oysters. And these illegal fishermen
are escorted by a numbers of Chinese coast guard ships armed with
cal. 50 machine guns and powerful water cannons, used to
intimidate and deter us Filipino fish folks from our
livelihood."<END QUOTE>
China's relations with its neighbors continue to deteriorate, bringing
increasing criticism. Diplomatic relations with Vietnam and the
Philippines have become increasingly hostile, and the two countries
are forming an alliance with Japan against China. Even Singapore,
which has always been very cautious about China, is now speaking out,
decrying China's militaristic approach. Reuters and Lowy Interpreter
****
**** In face of China's increased aggression, Japan reinterprets its constitution
****
Japan's prime minister Shinzo Abe has won his battle to partially
abandon his country's self-defense only military policy by
getting his cabinet to approve a reinterpretation of Article 9
of the Constitution, the clause that permits military activity
only for self-defense.
The change reinterprets the clause to allow Japan to use military
action to come to the aid of an ally under military attack.
According to Abe:
<QUOTE>"We will not resort to the use of force (solely) with
the aim of defending other countries. By being fully prepared to
deal with any situation, Japan can foil any attempt to wage war
against Japan."<END QUOTE>
According to the reinterpretation of the self-defense clause, Japan
will use only the minimum force necessary, and only when the attack on
the ally poses a clear danger to Japan. Japan Times
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko,
Russia, Vladimir Putin, Syria, Bashar al-Assad,
China, South China Sea, Philippines, Vietnam, Singapore,
Japan, Shinzo Abe
Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail