*** 14-Dec-14 World View -- The GCC honeymoon: Arab countries reach a 'historic' agreement
This morning's key headlines from
GenerationalDynamics.com
- Gulf Arab countries reach a 'historic' agreement
- The newfound friendly Arab consanguinity
- The GCC honeymoon: Pragmatic attitude towards Israel and Iran
****
**** Gulf Arab countries reach a 'historic' agreement
****
Gulf Cooperation Council meeting, December 9 (AFP)
The Gulf Cooperation Council (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi
Arabia and the United Arab Emirates) has succeeded in getting through
its summit meeting last week, apparently in relative harmony. (See
"21-Nov-14 World View -- Gulf nations paper over their differences for GCC Summit in December"
)
It's being called a "historic turning point" for the GCC, with
potentially far-reaching consequences, because the GCC members have
stopped quibbling with each other, and have unified against their
common enemies.
As I've written several times in the last few months, the Gaza war has
brought about
a major Mideast realignment
, splitting the GCC members apart. Egypt was the
catalyst for this split, at two points. First, when Egypt's army
ousted democratically elected Mohammed Morsi and his Muslim
Brotherhood government, and replaced him with former army general
Abdel al-Fattah al-Sisi, who proceeded with a very bloody crackdown on
the Muslim Brotherhood, Muslim Brotherhood supporters Turkey and Qatar
turned vehemently against al-Sisi, while Saudi Arabia supported him.
Second, when the Gaza war between Israel and Hamas began this summer,
al-Sisi supported Israel and the Palestinian Authority, and turned
against Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. In addition,
Iran supported Hamas against Israel. This created a
de facto
realignment of the Mideast, with Israel plus Egypt plus Saudi Arabia
plus the Palestinian Authority in alliance versus Hamas plus Qatar
plus Turkey plus Iran.
****
**** The newfound friendly Arab consanguinity
****
The reasons being given for this newfound friendly Arab consanguinity
is that a unified GCC stance is necessary "to stop ... attempts led
by neighboring countries to intervene in Arab affairs." The
two countries referenced are:
- Turkey has been "meddling" in Egypt's affairs by encouraging
the Muslim Brotherhood to oppose al-Sisi. Also, in a recent speech,
Turkey's president Recep Tayyip Erdogan told a crowd of his supporters
that no one can question Turkey's right to intervene in Egypt, Syria,
Iraq, Palestine and Bosnia and Herzegovina -- countries that were once
part of Turkey's Ottoman Empire. - Iran, the historic enemy of Saudi Arabia, is encouraging Shia
uprisings in Bahrain, eastern Saudi Arabia and Yemen.
According to the final communiqué issued by the summit:
<blockqoute>"On Egypt, the Supreme Council reiterated its firm
position in support of the Republic of Egypt and President Abdel
Fattah al-Sisi’s roadmap, stressing the Council’s full support and
stand with the people and Government of Egypt in achieving
stability and prosperity. The Council underscored the role of
Egypt at Arab and regional levels for the benefit of both the Arab
and Islamic countries."<END QUOTE>[/i][/indent]The communiqué also indicates unanimous opposition to the al-Qaeda
linked terrorists in Syria and Iraq:
<QUOTE>"The Supreme Council welcomed the UN Security Council
resolution No 2170 in August in 2014, under Chapter VII, which
condemned the spread of serious human rights violations by
terrorist groups, including terrorist groups in Iraq and Syria, in
particular the Daash and Al Nusra Front, and the sanctions imposed
on individuals associated with these groups."<END QUOTE>
"Daash" is the contemptuous Arabic name for the the Islamic State / of
Iraq and Syria (IS or ISIS or ISIL).
So everything's agreeable. Is there any trouble in paradise? The
problem is that the communiqué doesn't mention Israel, Hamas, or the
Palestinian Authority. The only mention of Gaza is the following:
<QUOTE>"The Supreme Council praised the results of the Gaza
reconstruction conference, which was held in Cairo in October
2014."<END QUOTE>
Well that's nice, but are all the GCC nations really going to turn
against Hamas, which would make all the member nations
de facto
allies of Israel and the Palestinian Authority? How long is
this pleasantness going to last?
Well, at the very least, we can understand the old Arab saying, "The
enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Eurasia Review/Arab News and
Asharq Al-Awsat (Riyadh) and
Saudi-US Relations Information Service
****
**** The GCC honeymoon: Pragmatic attitude towards Israel and Iran
****
An explanation of the GCC compromise with respect to Iran and Israel
was given in a television interview by a Saudi writer, Abdullah
Hamidaddin. Does Israel pose a threat to Saudi Arabia? His answer
was characterized by extreme pragmatism:
<QUOTE>"No. Israel is a troublemaker in the region, but it
poses a threat to the Palestinians, not to the Saudis. This has
nothing to do with the fact that the Palestinians have
rights. Israel is an aggressor on many levels. It is an unjust
country. We condemn the violence that we witness day and day
out. I am not talking about Israel's injustice towards the
Palestinians ...
It is imperative to distinguish between the two. The pan-Arabists
and the Islamists believe that because Israel occupied an Arab or
Muslim country, it must be annihilated as a matter of principle.
I have a different perspective. There is no doubt that Israel
plundered [Arab] land, but today the region is divided into
countries, one of which is Saudi Arabia. Israel attacked the land
of others, not my own land. By no means am I justifying this
attack, but with all its evils, it does not pose a threat to the
Saudi state or the Saudi citizens."<END QUOTE>
The interview pointed out that according to the official and declared
Saudi position, the Palestinian cause is the cause of all the Arabs.
<QUOTE>"There are two reasons for this. First, there is a
real problem. Israel's crisis with the Palestinians has generated
a regional problem. This crisis has ramifications – although, by
the way, these ramifications are highly exaggerated.
The second reason is the need to align with the general [Arab]
position. King Abdullah's 2003 initiative involved complete
normalization, and it was signed by all the Arabs, including
Syria. People were convinced that relations with Israel could be
normalized, and that we could have coexistence with it, on
condition that the problem in the West Bank and Gaza was resolved.
It is in Israel's interest for the problem to remain
unresolved. Israel is not a peaceful country. It is a very
oppressive country towards its Palestinian neighbors, and it does
whatever it can do to prolong the problem, because it benefits
from it."<END QUOTE>
Hamidaddin concluded by saying that the Arabs have wasted resources
attacking Israel in the past:
<QUOTE>"No, but I want to focus on the issues that affect
me. If Israel does not pose a strategic national threat, we should
not treat it as if it does. ...
[Israel did not create the threats coming from Iraq and Iran.]
No, it was us. Since the 1960s, when we turned Israel into a
problem, we have wasted our resources. Since the 1950s, the Arabs
have spent billions on the conflict with Israel, and have
sacrificed hundreds of thousands of lives. The outcome is that we
are in decline, whereas Israel is on the rise. If we had treated
the Palestinian cause differently right from the start, we would
have been today stronger and more capable than Israel, and the
Palestinians would have been better off."<END QUOTE>
So is the GCC crisis over? Another Saudi columnist, Salman Aldossary,
suggests that the honeymoon may not last, and that the worst may
be yet to come:
<QUOTE>"It is premature to think that the crisis has been
completely resolved. We should admit that only some of the roots
of the problem have been addressed. In addition, some details
remain vague. Perhaps the coming months will be sufficient to
demonstrate if the good intentions that have been expressed about
putting the GCC’s general interests above the narrow ones of its
member states are genuine. It should not be overlooked, however,
that this acute crisis produced fierce reactions that went beyond
those of previous inter-Gulf disputes. This was the case when some
sides, affiliated with some parties involved in the dispute,
lashed out at certain states or figures. These incidents will
definitely not be forgiven, no matter how hard those who were
responsible for them try to reach out to their brothers. There is
a big difference between disagreeing with someone and registering
one’s position through objective criticism on the one hand, and
throwing the worst insults at someone on the other. It is true
that the Gulf states have overcome their political differences and
are quite pragmatic, but they do not forget personal differences
and the insults that accompany them.
The GCC [has witnessed] a honeymoon period in the run-up to its
forthcoming annual summit. ... Who knows, the honeymoon may last
throughout the next year. ...
It would be dangerous if the crisis returned and the wound opened
once again, God forbid. In this case, the crisis would certainly
be more extreme, dangerous, and complex than before, and would
produce decisions whose impact no one will be able to comprehend.
May the honeymoon last forever! Nevertheless, wishes need to be
accompanied by deeds."<END QUOTE>
Generational Dynamics predicts that there will be a new war between
Arabs and Israelis, refighting the 1948 war between Jews and Arabs
that following the partitioning of Palestine and the creation of the
state of Israel.
Memri and
Asharq Al Awsat (Riyadh)
KEYS: Generational Dynamics, Gulf Cooperation Council, GCC,
Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, UAE, Kuwait, Oman,
Israel, Iran, Egypt, Muslim Brotherhood, Mohammed Morsi,
Abdel al-Fattah al-Sisi, Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan,
Ottoman Empire, Yemen, Hamas, Gaza, Palestinian Authority,
Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daash
Permanent web link to this article
Receive daily World View columns by e-mail