Originally Posted by Kinser79

Yes well Eric has a knack for ruining everything he touches

Yes, that's about right.

Originally Posted by Taramarie

Those names mean absolutely nothing to me.

They are the backbone of the first four years of the Bush administration. The Neocons.

Originally Posted by Bad Dog

They are the backbone of the first four years of the Bush administration. The Neocons.

oh ok something i would not have known given my age and where i was born and raised.

Speaking as a Cold Warrior, Late Boomer, the story of my cohort has been our marginalization at the hands of the Core Boomers, and the Hateful X'rs. All of of us born in the very last gasp of the Boom had optimism; the following generation was the first to face the hollow reality. The zombie fad is an example of the hopelessness felt by everyone born after the T4T cutoff of 1962 (?). The people now really running the show are Core X'rs, and they have as little mercy as the invading aliens, Cylons, or zombies they keep shoving down our throats on TV. X has 500 definitions of fail in their dictionary, and none for sympathy or empathy.

Hence the reliable resort to supers, or the supernatural, to save us from the Five Stages Of Grief for American Exceptionalism.

I'm a person who could have been center-right in almost any other age. I got shoved into the "liberal country-club" area, then into the "liberal" area. What changed is that the country went ax-crazy mad reactionary.

Almost everything I called came true. No honor, no thanks. I got kicked off the board once due to a hateful bitch, who used this board as her claw toy. Others got away with murder as well.

T4T has reached it's end. That means the real crisis can begin.

Originally Posted by Bad Dog

T4T has reached it's end. That means the real crisis can begin.

Are you talking about the forum? The forum lives on:
http://generational-theory.com/forum/index.php

Originally Posted by millst98

Are you talking about the forum? The forum lives on:
http://generational-theory.com/forum/index.php

Exactly. In these times we cannot let a community die.

Originally Posted by Bad Dog

They are the backbone of the first four years of the Bush administration. The Neocons.

Now that Trump is the only Republican candidate left standing they all like Clinton now. Tells you everything you need to know about them.

Originally Posted by Galen

Now that Trump is the only Republican candidate left standing they all like Clinton now. Tells you everything you need to know about them.

They vote for her they will loose. Ugh to vote for her...insane. They are voting for the status quo. They had a better chance with Bernie.

Originally Posted by Taramarie

They vote for her they will loose. Ugh to vote for her...insane. They are voting for the status quo. They had a better chance with Bernie.

The Neocons are the status quo Tara, as such Shillary is naturally preferable to them than Daddy, cause he shakes up the room just by walking into it.

Originally Posted by Kinser79

The Neocons are the status quo Tara, as such Shillary is naturally preferable to them than Daddy, cause he shakes up the room just by walking into it.

Yes he is rather large isn't he.

Originally Posted by Taramarie

They vote for her they will loose. Ugh to vote for her...insane. They are voting for the status quo. They had a better chance with Bernie.

I consider that Hillary represents the "status quo" of gradual and considered change to the status quo, that Obama started. Of course, the main block to change does not come from Obama or Hillary, but from the Republicans. They block and limit any proposals to change the status quo, and limit what can even be considered (such as taking money out of politics, single payer health insurance, etc.). Any and all means to vote out (and not vote in) any Republican, to any office, needs to be seriously considered, including a possible vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton. I mean, that's if we really want some change to the status quo to happen. Any Republican including Trump represents reversion to the outdated, past status quo.

Originally Posted by Taramarie

Yes he is rather large isn't he.

Well I'm told at least one part of him is but I cannot confirm that as a fact. /creepy

Originally Posted by Kinser79

Well I'm told at least one part of him is but I cannot confirm that as a fact. /creepy

Usually the ones who brag they have a large package are compensating for something so i am told. If you have to mention size of genitalia you are 1. a juvenile who has to resort to "my dick is bigger than yours "boy locker talk, and 2. probably have the peen of a gnat.

Originally Posted by Taramarie

Usually the ones who brag they have a large package are compensating for something so i am told. If you have to mention size of genitalia you are 1. a juvenile who has to resort to "my dick is bigger than yours "boy locker talk, and 2. probably have the peen of a gnat.

Actually as to point 1. I know you may not be used to it or even understand it. But that is "Guy talk". As to point 2. Except for gay men and the partners of those gay men size really does not matter. I hope I do not have to get into the biology of prostate stimulation here.

But I find it fascinating that you obviously did not get the obvious joke. I cannot speak for NZ, but in the US when one describes someone as manly or masculine or dominant the phrase "he has a set of <euphemism for testicles here> on him".

Originally Posted by Kinser79

Actually as to point 1. I know you may not be used to it or even understand it. But that is "Guy talk". As to point 2. Except for gay men and the partners of those gay men size really does not matter. I hope I do not have to get into the biology of prostate stimulation here.

But I find it fascinating that you obviously did not get the obvious joke. I cannot speak for NZ, but in the US when one describes someone as manly or masculine or dominant the phrase "he has a set of <euphemism for testicles here> on him".

As I am quite used to you dissecting anything and attempting to explain things, let me do the same. To your point one, as an xer who thinks he is a rational individual, it does not matter that it is "guy talk." The man is also running for president, and guy talk in front of not only the whole of America, but the world, and also the front runner, running for presidency on behalf of the republican party, should keep his comments of the size of his dick between himself and his male friends and not to the whole world. It is not professional.

As to point two, size also does not matter for straights. Us women have what is called the g spot. Which is close to the entrance of the vaginal opening. A large penis will not successfully hit that spot.

Trump is well known for a giant ego. His penis talk is simply a great example of that. It is no joke when a potential leader of a country behaves in that manner publicly. He should be focusing on politics, not the size of his dick.

Originally Posted by Taramarie

As I am quite used to you dissecting anything and attempting to explain things, let me do the same. To your point one, as an xer who thinks he is a rational individual, it does not matter that it is "guy talk." The man is also running for president, and guy talk in front of not only the whole of America, but the world,

Oddly the first person to bring up Daddy's package was none other the "Little Marco" Rubio (who dropped out of the race). Apparently during the 154th or whatever debate a comment was made by him as follows: "Well Trump has small hands and we know what that means..." Daddy's response to that was "I've never heard any complaints, he then went on to roast Rubio for the next week until he lost his own state which Trump won by a decent margin.

and also the front runner, running for presidency on behalf of the republican party, should keep his comments of the size of his dick between himself and his male friends and not to the whole world. It is not professional.

Again, the whole comment was started by someone who later went down after they started acting irrationally in Daddy's presence. The hit stage 5 and it was over. To my knowledge the most he's ever said about his own genitals publicly is he's never heard a complaint about them. Which really doesn't tell us much. Though watching Florida's Midget Senator (he really isn't a midget but his political career is over now) melt down on live tee-vee because he' was hyped up on adderal was entertaining.

As to point two, size also does not matter for straights.

Yes it does.

http://thestir.cafemom.com/love_sex/...retending_size

Us women have what is called the g spot. Which is close to the entrance of the vaginal opening. A large penis will not successfully hit that spot.

A small one won't either. Scientific studies have demonstrated that very few women have vaginal orgasms from intercourse alone, which is why foreplay is so important to a female's enjoyment of the act. Biologically speaking a female's orgasm/enjoyment of copulation is irrelevant but a male's is paramount.

Trump is well known for a giant ego. His penis talk is simply a great example of that. It is no joke when a potential leader of a country behaves in that manner publicly. He should be focusing on politics, not the size of his dick.

I will grant you Daddy does have a giant ego, he's an Alpha Male. As an Alpha Male myself I can tell you that (yes gay guys can be alphas too, we just like dick instead) having a large ego is paramount. Furthermore being a quite successful alpha male he has even more reason to have that ego.

I agree and that is why Senator Marco-lito (-lito being a Spanish suffix denoting small, cute or tiny, or at least Cuban Spanish) is no longer in the race.

Originally Posted by Kinser79

Oddly the first person to bring up Daddy's package was none other the "Little Marco" Rubio (who dropped out of the race). Apparently during the 154th or whatever debate a comment was made by him as follows: "Well Trump has small hands and we know what that means..." Daddy's response to that was "I've never heard any complaints, he then went on to roast Rubio for the next week until he lost his own state which Trump won by a decent margin.



Again, the whole comment was started by someone who later went down after they started acting irrationally in Daddy's presence. The hit stage 5 and it was over. To my knowledge the most he's ever said about his own genitals publicly is he's never heard a complaint about them. Which really doesn't tell us much. Though watching Florida's Midget Senator (he really isn't a midget but his political career is over now) melt down on live tee-vee because he' was hyped up on adderal was entertaining.



Yes it does.

http://thestir.cafemom.com/love_sex/...retending_size



A small one won't either. Scientific studies have demonstrated that very few women have vaginal orgasms from intercourse alone, which is why foreplay is so important to a female's enjoyment of the act. Biologically speaking a female's orgasm/enjoyment of copulation is irrelevant but a male's is paramount.



I will grant you Daddy does have a giant ego, he's an Alpha Male. As an Alpha Male (yes gay guys can be alphas too, we just like dick instead) having a large ego is paramount. Furthermore being a quite successful alpha male he has even more reason to have that ego.

I agree and that is why Senator Marco-lito (-lito being a Spanish suffix denoting small, cute or tiny, or at least Cuban Spanish) is no longer in the race.

The dignified thing to do would have been to ignore him....but Trump is anything but that.

Originally Posted by Kinser79

Oddly the first person to bring up Daddy's package was none other the "Little Marco" Rubio (who dropped out of the race). Apparently during the 154th or whatever debate a comment was made by him as follows: "Well Trump has small hands and we know what that means..." Daddy's response to that was "I've never heard any complaints, he then went on to roast Rubio for the next week until he lost his own state which Trump won by a decent margin.



Again, the whole comment was started by someone who later went down after they started acting irrationally in Daddy's presence. The hit stage 5 and it was over. To my knowledge the most he's ever said about his own genitals publicly is he's never heard a complaint about them. Which really doesn't tell us much. Though watching Florida's Midget Senator (he really isn't a midget but his political career is over now) melt down on live tee-vee because he' was hyped up on adderal was entertaining.



Yes it does.

http://thestir.cafemom.com/love_sex/...retending_size



A small one won't either. Scientific studies have demonstrated that very few women have vaginal orgasms from intercourse alone, which is why foreplay is so important to a female's enjoyment of the act. Biologically speaking a female's orgasm/enjoyment of copulation is irrelevant but a male's is paramount.



I will grant you Daddy does have a giant ego, he's an Alpha Male. As an Alpha Male (yes gay guys can be alphas too, we just like dick instead) having a large ego is paramount. Furthermore being a quite successful alpha male he has even more reason to have that ego.

I agree and that is why Senator Marco-lito (-lito being a Spanish suffix denoting small, cute or tiny, or at least Cuban Spanish) is no longer in the race.

As a gay man I do not think you can speak for us straights and our pleasure. It would be as presumptuous as a straight woman like me saying gays can only gain pleasure from (insert assumption). I am not interested in your link. I am a straight woman and I can tell you i do not need a large penis for pleasure so there goes your assumption flying out the window. You are gay. You cannot speak for us neither can your link. I speak from EXPERIENCE. But I know you will have some smart ass comment even though you are not speaking from experience. You are not straight, nor a woman. Please remember that before commenting.

Originally Posted by Kinser79

Oddly the first person to bring up Daddy's package was none other the "Little Marco" Rubio (who dropped out of the race). Apparently during the 154th or whatever debate a comment was made by him as follows: "Well Trump has small hands and we know what that means..." Daddy's response to that was "I've never heard any complaints, he then went on to roast Rubio for the next week until he lost his own state which Trump won by a decent margin.



Again, the whole comment was started by someone who later went down after they started acting irrationally in Daddy's presence. The hit stage 5 and it was over. To my knowledge the most he's ever said about his own genitals publicly is he's never heard a complaint about them. Which really doesn't tell us much. Though watching Florida's Midget Senator (he really isn't a midget but his political career is over now) melt down on live tee-vee because he' was hyped up on adderal was entertaining.



Yes it does.

http://thestir.cafemom.com/love_sex/...retending_size



A small one won't either. Scientific studies have demonstrated that very few women have vaginal orgasms from intercourse alone, which is why foreplay is so important to a female's enjoyment of the act. Biologically speaking a female's orgasm/enjoyment of copulation is irrelevant but a male's is paramount.



I will grant you Daddy does have a giant ego, he's an Alpha Male. As an Alpha Male (yes gay guys can be alphas too, we just like dick instead) having a large ego is paramount. Furthermore being a quite successful alpha male he has even more reason to have that ego.

I agree and that is why Senator Marco-lito (-lito being a Spanish suffix denoting small, cute or tiny, or at least Cuban Spanish) is no longer in the race.

True, but a smaller one as i said touches the g spot. Kinser, do not turn into Eric and listen for once in your god damned life. I am a female and i speak from experience on this.

Originally Posted by Taramarie

The dignified thing to do would have been to ignore him....but Trump is anything but that.

No that was the exactly wrong thing to do. The right thing to do was "I've heard no complaints. <Goes back to roast Jeb some more>" which is precisely what he did. In short, the right thing is to signal to the Meme Team (an other reason why Daddy will win and Granny Hillary will never be President) "time to make Rubio a complete joke". Which is precisely what he did.

Originally Posted by Taramarie

As a gay man I do not think you can speak for us straights and our pleasure. It would be as presumptuous as a straight woman like me saying gays can only gain pleasure from (insert assumption). I am not interested in your link. I am a straight woman and I can tell you i do not need a large penis for pleasure so there goes your assumption flying out the window. You are gay. You cannot speak for us neither can your link. I speak from EXPERIENCE. But I know you will have some smart ass comment even though you are not speaking from experience. You are not straight, nor a woman. Please remember that before commenting.

Obviously you did not read the article. A scientific study was conducted, it demonstrated that women have a preference for tall men with larger meat sticks. It has been repeated several times.

As for your experience, are you sure you want to bring that up? I mean in order to have this experience you would need to admit to, online, having been with more than a handful of men. I was a real slut, but I've never bragged about my numbers, it is tacky. Suffice it to say that I know plenty of straight females who assume because I'm gay it is safe to talk about men with me (as if I don't store all this information up in my brain like all other potentially useful information) and my observation is anything less than 15cm is a waste of time for the vast majority of women.

It is fortunate that average is around 16cm. This, however, does not negate the fact that as a group women prefer over that average.

Originally Posted by Taramarie

True, but a smaller one as i said touches the g spot. Kinser, do not turn into Eric and listen for once in your god damned life. I am a female and i speak from experience on this.

I'm going to need sauce from that besides your personal experience. Considering that the vast majority of females seem to indicate an almost complete inability to achieve orgasm from intercourse alone.

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Reprodu...ory?id=8485289

As for being like Eric, I have sources, I have data, I have facts. Eric argues from complete ignorance.

Originally Posted by Kinser79

No that was the exactly wrong thing to do. The right thing to do was "I've heard no complaints. <Goes back to roast Jeb some more>" which is precisely what he did. In short, the right thing is to signal to the Meme Team (an other reason why Daddy will win and Granny Hillary will never be President) "time to make Rubio a complete joke". Which is precisely what he did.



Obviously you did not read the article. A scientific study was conducted, it demonstrated that women have a preference for tall men with larger meat sticks. It has been repeated several times.

As for your experience, are you sure you want to bring that up? I mean in order to have this experience you would need to admit to, online, having been with more than a handful of men. I was a real slut, but I've never bragged about my numbers, it is tacky. Suffice it to say that I know plenty of straight females who assume because I'm gay it is safe to talk about men with me (as if I don't store all this information up in my brain like all other potentially useful information) and my observation is anything less than 15cm is a waste of time for the vast majority of women.

It is fortunate that average is around 16cm. This, however, does not negate the fact that as a group women prefer over that average.

A strong man who does not need to answer back to childish comments is the "bigger" man. But keep on "rubbing" him if you wish.

Of course i did not read the article. Yes of course, you know best when it comes to straight women...

One does not need to be with loads of men to know preference. Have you never heard of toys? Straights have them. Only you can answer yay or nay to whether gays do. I do not give one shit about whether you are gay or not in order to talk about this. I am proving those "scientific results wrong by what i have experienced and i also doubt they were able to test every single female in the world to gather whether large is preferable or not. Call me a skeptic on this one. You should be proud....a millie is thinking for herself!

Originally Posted by Kinser79

I'm going to need sauce from that besides your personal experience. Considering that the vast majority of females seem to indicate an almost complete inability to achieve orgasm from intercourse alone.

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Reprodu...ory?id=8485289

As for being like Eric, I have sources, I have data, I have facts. Eric argues from complete ignorance.

You also are the last person who should be talking about this given you are not female nor straight. You have no experience on this, only data that does not take into account every single female. Call me a doubter on your "facts."

Originally Posted by Kinser79

No that was the exactly wrong thing to do. The right thing to do was "I've heard no complaints. <Goes back to roast Jeb some more>" which is precisely what he did. In short, the right thing is to signal to the Meme Team (an other reason why Daddy will win and Granny Hillary will never be President) "time to make Rubio a complete joke". Which is precisely what he did.



Obviously you did not read the article. A scientific study was conducted, it demonstrated that women have a preference for tall men with larger meat sticks. It has been repeated several times.

As for your experience, are you sure you want to bring that up? I mean in order to have this experience you would need to admit to, online, having been with more than a handful of men. I was a real slut, but I've never bragged about my numbers, it is tacky. Suffice it to say that I know plenty of straight females who assume because I'm gay it is safe to talk about men with me (as if I don't store all this information up in my brain like all other potentially useful information) and my observation is anything less than 15cm is a waste of time for the vast majority of women.

It is fortunate that average is around 16cm. This, however, does not negate the fact that as a group women prefer over that average.

That is disgustingly incorrect I can tell you that for certain. Only a waste of time if the man thinks regardless of size penetration alone will do the job.

Kinser you are amusing. Talking about female pleasure when you have zero experience in this field. What an ego to think you know it all. Even in fields you know nothing about. Quit while you can. You can literally look up a ton of studies on this that clash with others. It depends on the group. The group does not mean ALL or even MOST women prefer large. To think so is completely ignorant. This is the same kind of argument i have with Eric. The ego to think you know what is best without even listening to what others say. If you do not believe, look it up. As well as separate opinions which defy your studies which only would judge by the ones they studied which again does not reflect what the wider population enjoys. Kinser, THINK. Use that head of yours. But it may not be a field you should even go near for reasons you well know why.