How does _Dune_ foreshadow the Awakening, though? I'm not sure I follow you here.
In a number of ways, actually. Paul Atreides is a classic Prophet figure, although in some ways the large-scale action is more 4T than 2T. But the prophecy, the psychic powers, the questioning of traditional values, and the ecological themes, all foreshadow either 2Ts in general or the MilSaec 2T specifically. Dune was published in the early 1960s I believe, so it was quite close in time. Same with Stranger.
But they _don't_ share the same values, except in so far as they both condemn such things as adultery and murder.
I disagree. The similarity runs far deeper than that. Recall the list of core evangelical values I posted on another thread: literal Biblical inerrancy, unique Christian salvation, rejection of other religions, and sexual puritanism. Fundamentalist Islam is identical on all points except that one must substitute Islam and the Koran for Christianity and the Bible.
(Everybody opposes murder.)
The Taliban _expressly_ seeks a literal theocracy. Their version of clergy, in their ideal state, would not just have greater power than the government, they would _be_ the government.
The American RR, in spite of all the propaganda the media spin out, _don't_ wish that!
The more extreme American RR voices, such as Pat Robertson, want an express theocracy every bit as much the Taliban, which is on the extreme end of fundamentalist Islam. Robertson is, for instance, on record as saying that only Christians should be allowed to run for public office.
It is very possible -- no, actually it is quite likely, that the Muslim fundamentalists tend to greater extremes than the Christian ones. I know of no Christian groups that would go as far as the Taliban, and likely there is greater moderation across the board among Christians than among Muslims. If I were to guess at a cause, it would be because American Christians live in gentler circumstances and have less cause to be mad at the world. But in any case, this difference is only one of degree.
One does not have to agree with them to recognize that they are driven, in their own way, by a love of country.
Correct. And that should be made clear. I am not suggesting that anyone is a traitor. It is only a similarity of value systems at work here, not complicity in a crime or even sympathy for criminals.
That's the common Boomer/Prohet/Idealist outlook, if Strauss and Howe are accurate in their analysis. We'll just have to agree to disagree here, because on this issue I agree with the RR that God is external to humans.
Actually it's not limited to Prophets by any means. (For that matter, I would venture a guess that there are more Boomer fundies than any other generation, by percentage.)
Whether God is external or internal or both is something beyond rational knowledge. All I'm saying is that God is found within. Whether God is something separate from the universe, as Christian doctrine holds, or the spirit that animates the universe, as in the Hindu mythos, it remains true that God is the foundation and source of our being, and it is at that foundation and source that He/She/It may be found.
This by the way is not at all incompatible with evangelical thought. What is incompatible, however, is the recognition that both the Christian and the Hindu doctrine (plus many others) are metaphors for a Reality that can't be known, and as such each is equally valid. Indeed, each serves as a good counterpoint to the other, so that we can avoid the error of thinking our model a literal truth rather than a metaphor.
The infinite cannot fit into a box. You cannot drink the ocean; you can only swim in it.
I suspect that the Taliban/Bin Laden, if they were grading societies on the basis of how secular they were, would assign current Iran a B-, Saudi Arabia a C, an RR dominated America a D-, and secular America an F.
Hmm. I don't know about the Taliban, but by all accounts bin Laden hates the Saudis even more than he does the U.S. Secular governments ruling Muslims are especially anathema.
So I think we would have to grade a hypothetical American Christian state above the government of any Muslim country except Afghanistan and Iran. But certainly no better than a B, as it would be Christian rather than Muslim.
Make that a C, give the Taliban an A, Iran a B, a few other governments of Muslim nations a D, and the rest of the world an F.