Re: The next 9-1-1
Originally Posted by
Kevin Parker '59
...at which time everyone will realize that 911 was what we at T4T call the Fourth Turning Catalyst, not just the 65% of us posters who believe so. The second big attack will herald the 4T Social Moment, the Regeneracy, at which time we will perhaps start bombing the s&*t out of Saudi Arabia. As XoE said on another thread, "it is they who attacked us on Sept. 11, 2001 (not Iraq), and they'll do it again".
It may also be the time when many other American cities, counties and perhaps States will follow Eugene, Oregon's lead in denouncing the destruction of our Constitutional liberties in the name of "Homeland Security". We may also decide that we've "had enough" of Corporate America's hijacking of our government, and demand its return to We The People.
Okay, here it is in a nutshell. Kevin has posted very clearly and succinctly what I see as the contradiction of (what appears to be) the majority opinion here at T4T. Anyone who agrees with him has an excellent chance to explain how you get from one to the other of these theories. I'd agree with most of the first paragraph, only disagreeing that Iraq and its nuclear potential is a real threat.
But I can't see how you can go from there to agreement with the second paragraph.... It doesn't even fit S&H theories, which suggest that we'll tolerate restrictions for the duration of the Crisis, not rebel against them, unless the Crisis itself revolves around such a rebellion - which the first paragraph suggests it isn't.
Where's the methodology here?
Christopher O'Conor
13er, '68 cohort