Generational Dynamics
Fourth Turning Forum Archive


Popular links:
Generational Dynamics Web Site
Generational Dynamics Forum
Fourth Turning Archive home page
New Fourth Turning Forum

Thread: Middle East - Page 19







Post#451 at 05-25-2007 03:29 PM by salsabob [at Washington DC joined Jan 2005 #posts 746]
---
05-25-2007, 03:29 PM #451
Join Date
Jan 2005
Location
Washington DC
Posts
746

Iran wants what?!

Here's an open source summary of some Statfor (subscription) analysis about recent US-Iran, behind the scenes, negotiations -

http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/7528

I don't know, but if Iran really wants these things, they must be the 'white hats'

1. Iran does not want an abrupt withdrawal of coalition forces from Iraq for fear this would lead to reshuffling the cards and redistributing power. Instead, there should be a fixed timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. and British forces from Iraqi cities and relocation at bases and camps inside Iraq, provided the Iraqi forces have reached the point at which they can provide security. The Iranians also stated that they would extend all possible assistance so that foreign forces could exit "honorably" from Iraq.
to the United States that they are willing to cooperate so the Iraq withdrawal does not look like another Vietnam scenario for the U.S. administration to deal with at home.

2. Iran is "strongly opposed to all attempts to partition Iraq or impose a federal system that allows for regional autonomy." No region should be allowed to monopolize the resources in its territory and deprive other regions of the revenues from these resources.

3. Iran wants a plan, involving the Kurds and Sunnis, drawn up to root out the transnational jihadist forces allied with al Qaeda in Iraq. Sunni tribes should also assume the responsibility of confronting jihadists, whether they are Iraqi citizens or are from other Arab and Muslim countries.

4. Iran clearly states that the negotiations over Iraq cannot be separated from other regional issues and Tehran's nuclear file.

5. Iran wants a new regional formula that would make Iraq a region of influence for Tehran.

The United States will not, according to Stratfor, let Iraq become a satellite state of Iran and Iran know this, but a Shiite government in place in Baghdad would probably suffice.

The Iranian paper outlined several key concessions it would offer the United States and Iraq's Sunni faction if its demands were met.

1. Iran would help the Iraqi government rein in the armed Shiite militias and incorporate them into the state security apparatus.

2. The de-Baathification law can be revised to allow for the rehiring of former Iraqi army personnel, the bulk of whom are tied to the Sunni nationalist insurgency. However, Iran wants assurances that former Interim Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi and other former Baathists will not be allowed to hold the position of Prime Minister when the time comes to replace current Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

3. Iran would be willing to see fresh parliamentary elections, the formation of a new Cabinet and the amendment of the Iraqi Constitution to double the Sunni seats in parliament to 40 percent, with the Shia retaining 60 percent. Tehran has said nothing about what would be left for Kurdish political representation, however.

4. Iran has proposed the "fair" distribution of oil revenues in Iraq to satisfy all parties, especially those in "central Iraq," the Sunni-dominated, oil-deprived heart of the country.
According to Stratfor, “it looks as if the Kurds will get screwed again”.

The United States doesn’t want Iraq to become a proxy state of Iran. That will probably not happen. Another point brought up was that Iran does not want Iraq to be equipped with offensive military capabilities.
I don't know but does that seem like the Iran we've all come to know and love?

Maybe it's close to the truth but there sure seems to be a lot of weird stuff floating around in the ether in the last couple weeks.
"Che l'uomo il suo destin fugge di raro [For rarely man escapes his destiny]" - Ludovico Ariosto







Post#452 at 06-12-2007 10:54 PM by catfishncod [at The People's Republic of Cambridge & Possum Town, MS joined Apr 2005 #posts 984]
---
06-12-2007, 10:54 PM #452
Join Date
Apr 2005
Location
The People's Republic of Cambridge & Possum Town, MS
Posts
984

Welcome to the Palestinian Civil War.

This time, families are being targeted. People are being shot in drumhead executions and thrown bodily off skyscraper roofs. I don't think even peace talks held under duress in Mecca will work this time.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/13/wo...rssnyt&emc=rss

Palestine is now 4T. I predict al-Qaeda will attempt to move in next, as they share the Iranian desire to take over the "struggle against the Zionists" and the street credibility thereof. (Hamas and Hezbollah are well known to be clients of Iran.)
'81, 30/70 X/Millie, trying to live in both Red and Blue America... "Catfish 'n Cod"







Post#453 at 11-09-2007 05:50 PM by Steven McTowelie [at Cary, NC joined Jun 2002 #posts 535]
---
11-09-2007, 05:50 PM #453
Join Date
Jun 2002
Location
Cary, NC
Posts
535

Al Qaeda's generational split

RECENT CONFUSION over the status of Jamal al-Badawi, one the masterminds of the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen in 2000, illustrates the difficulties of containing an increasingly fractured jihadist movement. Badawi, who escaped from prison early last year, had surrendered to the Yemeni government in early October, only to be released as part of a plea deal. These events have sparked confusion and anger in the United States.

In Yemen, meanwhile, authorities have continued to make misleading and ambiguous statements about his whereabouts. It would be easy to assume, as many have done, that the country's reaction was that of a reluctant ally eager to shirk its responsibility in the war against Al Qaeda. This reading, as Rudy Giuliani suggested, demands that the United States threaten Yemen with a reduction in aid.

But what to the United States is a cohesive organization bound together by a common hatred is to Yemen a fragmented movement that is rife with infighting and dissension.

Over the past several months, a generational schism has emerged within Al Qaeda's ranks in Yemen, pitting younger, more radicalized members against the more experienced old guard. Since 2003, the Yemeni government and Al Qaeda in Yemen have reached what could best be described as a tacit nonaggression pact. Through a combination of military action and negotiation, Yemen has attempted to convince the militants not that their beliefs are incorrect, but rather that they would hurt their own cause and base of operations by acting violently within the borders of the state.







Post#454 at 01-28-2008 11:45 AM by KaiserD2 [at David Kaiser '47 joined Jul 2001 #posts 5,220]
---
01-28-2008, 11:45 AM #454
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
David Kaiser '47
Posts
5,220

Is Iraq in crisis?

I was rather surprised to find there is no Iraq thread on this forum, so this will have to do.

Some time ago I was in an extended argument with a certain poster over whether there was, or would be, a civil war in Iraq. He argued repeatedly that the answer was no, because Iraq had had its Fourth Turning in the 1980s during the war with Iran, a "genocidal war", he said, of the sort characteristic of 4Ts.

I have just heard a lecture (unclass) by a historian who has been studying original Iraqi documents on that Iran-Iraq war, and he reports that it cost the Iraqis about 300,000 lives. I submit that many estimates show that to be much less than what the Iraqis have lost since 2002. In addition, there are between 1.5 million and 2 million Iraqi refugees outside Iraq and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been internally displaced; and there is no central government to speak of in Iraq. In other words, by any measure what Iraq has been through since 2002 is much, much worse than what it went through in the 1980s, when the social order survived intact.

When the 4T should have happened in Iraq is a tricky question. If we go back to the founding of Iraq then 2002 was right on schedule; but the Ba'ath-Communist civil war of the 1960s looks like a 4T too. . .I would suggest the following. The saeculum is based on an average long life, but many diseased (or simply unlucky) people do not live that long. In the same way, a social or political order can die unexpectedly early for all sorts of reasons, including foreign invasion. In any case, anyone who could deny that Iraq is now in a 4T is depriving the concept of any possible meaning.
Last edited by KaiserD2; 01-28-2008 at 02:35 PM. Reason: mistake







Post#455 at 01-29-2008 11:57 PM by Tristan [at Melbourne, Australia joined Oct 2003 #posts 1,249]
---
01-29-2008, 11:57 PM #455
Join Date
Oct 2003
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Posts
1,249

Quote Originally Posted by Steven McTowelie View Post
Al Qaeda's generational split

RECENT CONFUSION over the status of Jamal al-Badawi, one the masterminds of the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen in 2000, illustrates the difficulties of containing an increasingly fractured jihadist movement. Badawi, who escaped from prison early last year, had surrendered to the Yemeni government in early October, only to be released as part of a plea deal. These events have sparked confusion and anger in the United States.

In Yemen, meanwhile, authorities have continued to make misleading and ambiguous statements about his whereabouts. It would be easy to assume, as many have done, that the country's reaction was that of a reluctant ally eager to shirk its responsibility in the war against Al Qaeda. This reading, as Rudy Giuliani suggested, demands that the United States threaten Yemen with a reduction in aid.

But what to the United States is a cohesive organization bound together by a common hatred is to Yemen a fragmented movement that is rife with infighting and dissension.

Over the past several months, a generational schism has emerged within Al Qaeda's ranks in Yemen, pitting younger, more radicalized members against the more experienced old guard. Since 2003, the Yemeni government and Al Qaeda in Yemen have reached what could best be described as a tacit nonaggression pact. Through a combination of military action and negotiation, Yemen has attempted to convince the militants not that their beliefs are incorrect, but rather that they would hurt their own cause and base of operations by acting violently within the borders of the state.
I would say that the Idealist and/or Adaptive leadership of Al Qaeda (Bin Ladin is a early wave Idealist according to my view of Middle Eastern Generations). Is facing problems with their now overwhelming Reactive rank and file. The 911 attackers were either later wave Idealists or early wave reactive.
"The f****** place should be wiped off the face of the earth".

David Bowie on Los Angeles







Post#456 at 02-01-2008 08:39 AM by KaiserD2 [at David Kaiser '47 joined Jul 2001 #posts 5,220]
---
02-01-2008, 08:39 AM #456
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
David Kaiser '47
Posts
5,220

A different view

Quote Originally Posted by Tristan View Post
I would say that the Idealist and/or Adaptive leadership of Al Qaeda (Bin Ladin is a early wave Idealist according to my view of Middle Eastern Generations). Is facing problems with their now overwhelming Reactive rank and file. The 911 attackers were either later wave Idealists or early wave reactive.
I would like to propose something different. The turnings theory is about the rise and decline of civic virtue. One could argue that highly traditional societies (such as Saudi Arabia) don't have any such concept--and that therefore, we can't identify turnings within them clearly. And Saudi Arabia, of course, is the home of Al Queda.

The situation is somewhat different in Iraq which was ruled by a western-style totalitarian party for about forty years--but which has now lapsed into tribal/sectarian anarchy with no sign of any real unifying force.

The Palestinians strike me as much more modern.

Just a thought. Now off to work. .







Post#457 at 02-01-2008 07:31 PM by Tristan [at Melbourne, Australia joined Oct 2003 #posts 1,249]
---
02-01-2008, 07:31 PM #457
Join Date
Oct 2003
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Posts
1,249

Quote Originally Posted by KaiserD2 View Post
I would like to propose something different. The turnings theory is about the rise and decline of civic virtue. One could argue that highly traditional societies (such as Saudi Arabia) don't have any such concept--and that therefore, we can't identify turnings within them clearly. And Saudi Arabia, of course, is the home of Al Queda.

The situation is somewhat different in Iraq which was ruled by a western-style totalitarian party for about forty years--but which has now lapsed into tribal/sectarian anarchy with no sign of any real unifying force.

The Palestinians strike me as much more modern.

Just a thought. Now off to work. .
Saudi Arabia is less 'traditional' inspite of it's political system, it was experiencing much the same upheavals as the rest of the middle east in the 80's. In 1979 the Grand Mosque in Mecca came under attack by religiously motivated critics of the monarchy.

Despite being the country with the most strict enforcement of Islamic law or the Sharia in the world. Islamists still hate the Saudi Monarchy because of it's alliance with the USA and allowing non-Muslims to live in Arabia (A saying attributed to Muhammad said all Christians and Jews be forbidden to live in Arabia).
"The f****** place should be wiped off the face of the earth".

David Bowie on Los Angeles







Post#458 at 02-11-2009 08:45 AM by KaiserD2 [at David Kaiser '47 joined Jul 2001 #posts 5,220]
---
02-11-2009, 08:45 AM #458
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
David Kaiser '47
Posts
5,220

The Israeli election

Israel seems still to be in 3T mode, and, basically, in a mess, the day after yesterday's election.

Politically the left wing in Israel, which founded the state, is pretty much dead--the once-heroic Labor Party won 13 out of 120 seats yesterday. The centrist Kadima, founded b Ariel Sharon, barely won the most seats, beating the Likud 28-27. Tzipi Livni, their leader, who seems to be cut from the Hillary Clinton Prophet mold (she is 50) claims the right to form a new government. However, combining her votes with those of Labor gives just 41 out of the 61 she would need for a majority. Also on the Right are Avigdor Lieberman's violently anti-Arab Yisrael Beitenu with 15 and the ultra-Orthodox Shas with 11. Adding those to Likud gives 53 which is in sight of a majority. So Livni is courting Lieberman, which to my untrained American eye casts a huge doubt on her dovish credentials. Another aspect of the results suggest something really funny is going on within Israeli democracy. 19% of the Israeli population (we aren't talking about the Palestinians) is Arab--but the Arab parties won just 4 seats. I don't see how anything but a hawkish government can emerge from all this.







Post#459 at 02-11-2009 10:57 AM by Odin [at Moorhead, MN, USA joined Sep 2006 #posts 14,442]
---
02-11-2009, 10:57 AM #459
Join Date
Sep 2006
Location
Moorhead, MN, USA
Posts
14,442

Quote Originally Posted by KaiserD2 View Post
Israel seems still to be in 3T mode, and, basically, in a mess, the day after yesterday's election.

Politically the left wing in Israel, which founded the state, is pretty much dead--the once-heroic Labor Party won 13 out of 120 seats yesterday. The centrist Kadima, founded b Ariel Sharon, barely won the most seats, beating the Likud 28-27. Tzipi Livni, their leader, who seems to be cut from the Hillary Clinton Prophet mold (she is 50) claims the right to form a new government. However, combining her votes with those of Labor gives just 41 out of the 61 she would need for a majority. Also on the Right are Avigdor Lieberman's violently anti-Arab Yisrael Beitenu with 15 and the ultra-Orthodox Shas with 11. Adding those to Likud gives 53 which is in sight of a majority. So Livni is courting Lieberman, which to my untrained American eye casts a huge doubt on her dovish credentials. Another aspect of the results suggest something really funny is going on within Israeli democracy. 19% of the Israeli population (we aren't talking about the Palestinians) is Arab--but the Arab parties won just 4 seats. I don't see how anything but a hawkish government can emerge from all this.
Listening to stuff on the Israeli election on the BBC I was struck by how much pessimism and cynicism there is. Looks like your "Israel is 4T" pronouncement was wrong.
To recommend thrift to the poor is both grotesque and insulting. It is like advising a man who is starving to eat less.

-Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man under Socialism







Post#460 at 02-11-2009 11:12 AM by herbal tee [at joined Dec 2005 #posts 7,116]
---
02-11-2009, 11:12 AM #460
Join Date
Dec 2005
Posts
7,116

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
Listening to stuff on the Israeli election on the BBC I was struck by how much pessimism and cynicism there is. Looks like your "Israel is 4T" pronouncement was wrong.
But the general trend away from the western tradition within Israel is undeniable. From 1948-73 the Labor party, which was founded by the same european Jews who founded Israel itself, promoted what was basically a social democracy. Each succeeding generation of Israelis has been more non-european and conservative. I personally believe that an Israeli government that will be 4Tish in war policy and non-inclusive in regards to non-Jewish elements with the state is coming. The storm has been delayed but not diverted.







Post#461 at 02-11-2009 11:39 AM by Skabungus [at West Michigan joined Jun 2007 #posts 1,027]
---
02-11-2009, 11:39 AM #461
Join Date
Jun 2007
Location
West Michigan
Posts
1,027

Quote Originally Posted by herbal tee View Post
But the general trend away from the western tradition within Israel is undeniable. From 1948-73 the Labor party, which was founded by the same european Jews who founded Israel itself, promoted what was basically a social democracy. Each succeeding generation of Israelis has been more non-european and conservative. I personally believe that an Israeli government that will be 4Tish in war policy and non-inclusive in regards to non-Jewish elements with the state is coming. The storm has been delayed but not diverted.
I would have to agree completely and believe it does not bode well for the region in general, and Israel specifically.

A Post-Zionist posture would move Israel in a more positive direction. I dont see that as likely though







Post#462 at 02-11-2009 11:55 AM by SVE-KRD [at joined Apr 2007 #posts 1,097]
---
02-11-2009, 11:55 AM #462
Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
1,097

Quote Originally Posted by Skabungus View Post
I would have to agree completely and believe it does not bode well for the region in general, and Israel specifically.

A Post-Zionist posture would move Israel in a more positive direction. I dont see that as likely though
No, an increasingly intolerant society set in the midst of another, equally intolerant (and ferociously hostile to itself) society,...







Post#463 at 02-11-2009 12:52 PM by Matt1989 [at joined Sep 2005 #posts 3,018]
---
02-11-2009, 12:52 PM #463
Join Date
Sep 2005
Posts
3,018

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
Listening to stuff on the Israeli election on the BBC I was struck by how much pessimism and cynicism there is. Looks like your "Israel is 4T" pronouncement was wrong.
Characteristic of an early 4T...







Post#464 at 02-11-2009 01:54 PM by Skabungus [at West Michigan joined Jun 2007 #posts 1,027]
---
02-11-2009, 01:54 PM #464
Join Date
Jun 2007
Location
West Michigan
Posts
1,027

Quote Originally Posted by SVE-KRD View Post
No, an increasingly intolerant society set in the midst of another, equally intolerant (and ferociously hostile to itself) society,...
????? Please elaborate.







Post#465 at 02-11-2009 02:27 PM by The Wonkette [at Arlington, VA 1956 joined Jul 2002 #posts 9,209]
---
02-11-2009, 02:27 PM #465
Join Date
Jul 2002
Location
Arlington, VA 1956
Posts
9,209

Quote Originally Posted by Skabungus View Post
I would have to agree completely and believe it does not bode well for the region in general, and Israel specifically.

A Post-Zionist posture would move Israel in a more positive direction. I dont see that as likely though
How would you define as "post-Zionist" posture for Israel?
I want people to know that peace is possible even in this stupid day and age. Prem Rawat, June 8, 2008







Post#466 at 02-11-2009 03:45 PM by Skabungus [at West Michigan joined Jun 2007 #posts 1,027]
---
02-11-2009, 03:45 PM #466
Join Date
Jun 2007
Location
West Michigan
Posts
1,027

Quote Originally Posted by The Wonkette View Post
How would you define as "post-Zionist" posture for Israel?
I’d say a Post Zionist state would be one where:

-The state of Israel becomes a democracy as opposed to a Jewish democratic state. Doing so would give all citizens an equal stake in the future of the nation – like say, most other democracies where jews, muslims, Christians, atheists and pagans are granted the same rights to participate in the secular state affairs.

-Israel accepts it’s role in the ME as a ME state, and not insist on a future trajectory that is somehow separate and special.

Up until now, we’ve accepted the Zionist narrative that set up Israel as a special homeland for the Jewish people. To that end the territory was carved out with artificial boundaries to accommodate Jews from all over the world: a separate sacred homeland and refuge. To that end the existing inhabitants were in large part driven out to make room. In other instances where this has happened it is looked upon with abhorrence.

Were Israel to look upon the Palestinians and surrounding ME states as partners, and look to confederation on a common future, this would be post-Zionist. Granted, the Palestinians, Jordanians, Lebanese, Egyptians and Syrians and Israelis don’t come to mind as ideal bedfellows, but that is not the fault of the idea, but of the participants.

Many examples exist around the world of “warring tribes” dropping their myriad differences to unite and become strong and prosperous forces in history. Is the post-Zionist future pie in the sky? If so, then so is the EEC, USA, etc. It was not long ago that the EEC was a battle ground. America had it’s trial by fire.

The weakness in the dream of a post Zionist state lies not in the idea but in the mean-spirited selfishness of the Jews and Arabs that insist on “all or nothing solutions”.









Post#467 at 02-12-2009 01:42 PM by SVE-KRD [at joined Apr 2007 #posts 1,097]
---
02-12-2009, 01:42 PM #467
Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
1,097

Quote Originally Posted by Skabungus View Post
????? Please elaborate.
When two societies, each completely intolerant of the other, collide, something's got to give. It's kind of like the Cascadia School of Plate Tectonics - when said something does give, the results are cataclysmic. (Think of what's building between Arabs and Israelis as the political version of an impending 9.2+ on the Richter Scale Megathrust Earthquake - and associated tsunami.)
Last edited by SVE-KRD; 02-12-2009 at 02:30 PM.







Post#468 at 02-12-2009 01:47 PM by Skabungus [at West Michigan joined Jun 2007 #posts 1,027]
---
02-12-2009, 01:47 PM #468
Join Date
Jun 2007
Location
West Michigan
Posts
1,027

Quote Originally Posted by SVE-KRD View Post
When two societies, each completely intolerant of the other, collide, something's got to give. It's kind of like the Cascadia School of Plate Tectonics - when said something does give, the results are cataclysmic. (Think of what's building between Arabs and Israelis as the political version of an impending 9.2+ on the Richter Scale Megathrust Earthquake.)
Agreed. It seems pathetic that it should be that way but.......... neither side chooses to rise above the blame game, tit for tat.







Post#469 at 02-12-2009 02:30 PM by SVE-KRD [at joined Apr 2007 #posts 1,097]
---
02-12-2009, 02:30 PM #469
Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
1,097

Also, speaking of the global repercussions of said event, I was about to add on to my last post the phrase 'and associated tsunami'.

(I decided to go ahead and add it on anyway.)







Post#470 at 02-12-2009 02:33 PM by SVE-KRD [at joined Apr 2007 #posts 1,097]
---
02-12-2009, 02:33 PM #470
Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
1,097

Quote Originally Posted by Skabungus View Post
Agreed. It seems pathetic that it should be that way but.......... neither side chooses to rise above the blame game, tit for tat.

With both sides equally intolerant of each other's existence, each has reason to believe that 'to rise above' = 'to commit suicide'.

Basically, you're asking a piranha to make nice with a crocodile - and vice versa.
Last edited by SVE-KRD; 02-12-2009 at 02:38 PM.







Post#471 at 02-16-2009 10:08 AM by KaiserD2 [at David Kaiser '47 joined Jul 2001 #posts 5,220]
---
02-16-2009, 10:08 AM #471
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
David Kaiser '47
Posts
5,220

My critics have a point. Israel's politics at the moment look like an institutionalized 3T. For a blog post on Saturday I surveyed all the parties on Wikipedia--Byzantium had nothing half so complex to offer. . .the system promotes this, by encouraging people to form new parties, and thus perpetuates itself. And this has been reflected in Israeli politics over the last 8 years where no one has been able to make a firm decision on what direction in which to go--even invasions of Lebanon and Gaza do not reflect an actual long-term policy--they are a substitute for one. Perhaps the $5 billion annual American aid is helping this situation to continue.
The Labor Party has shrunk drastically. Part of the reason is undoubtedly emigration. Something like 10% of registered Israeli voters now live overseas, and I suspect they are mostly the more liberal and westernized ones.
A possible attack on Iran, it occurs to me, may be emerging as a substitute for making the critical 4T decisions that Israel faces.







Post#472 at 04-09-2009 11:42 AM by Linus [at joined Oct 2005 #posts 1,731]
---
04-09-2009, 11:42 AM #472
Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
1,731

"Saudi government cracks down on Shiite dissidents"

Quote Originally Posted by Donna Abu-Nasr

AWWAMIYA, Saudi Arabia (AP) — A cleric's threat of secession has brought a swift government crackdown in this poor, radical Shiite town in Saudi Arabia's increasingly restive religious minority heartland atop the Sunni kingdom's main oil reserves.

Cleric Sheik Nimr al-Nimr threatened to break away if Saudi authorities don't treat Shiites better. Followers of the sect make up 10 percent of the kingdom's population of 22.6 million and they have long complained of discrimination, saying they are barred from key positions in the military and government and are not given an equal share of the country's wealth.

"Our dignity has been pawned away, and if it is not ... restored, we will call for secession," al-Nimr said during Friday prayers last month. "Our dignity is more precious than the unity of this land."

Since that incendiary sermon, more than 35 people have been arrested in a government crackdown and al-Nimr has gone into hiding. Police have set up checkpoints on the roads leading into Awwamiya, one of the Shiite area's poorest towns.
"Jan, cut the crap."

"It's just a donut."







Post#473 at 09-10-2011 02:54 PM by KaiserD2 [at David Kaiser '47 joined Jul 2001 #posts 5,220]
---
09-10-2011, 02:54 PM #473
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
David Kaiser '47
Posts
5,220

A serious 4T is hitting the Middle East. Turkey is challenging the legality of Israel's Gaza blockade in the World Court and has downgraded diplomatic relations with Israel. Egyptian rioters took over the Israeli embassy in Cairo. And the Palestinian independence declaration is looming and will be endorsed by the General Assembly. And I haven't even mentioned Iran! Ironically, Iran, Turkey and eventually Egypt were de facto allies of Israel for much of its modern existence--but no more. I don't know where this is going but it's big.







Post#474 at 09-11-2011 01:39 PM by wtrg8 [at NoVA joined Dec 2008 #posts 1,262]
---
09-11-2011, 01:39 PM #474
Join Date
Dec 2008
Location
NoVA
Posts
1,262

Quote Originally Posted by KaiserD2 View Post
A serious 4T is hitting the Middle East. Turkey is challenging the legality of Israel's Gaza blockade in the World Court and has downgraded diplomatic relations with Israel. Egyptian rioters took over the Israeli embassy in Cairo. And the Palestinian independence declaration is looming and will be endorsed by the General Assembly. And I haven't even mentioned Iran! Ironically, Iran, Turkey and eventually Egypt were de facto allies of Israel for much of its modern existence--but no more. I don't know where this is going but it's big.
Let's all watch, 'Battle of Algiers'. I hear hear it's a Kissinger favorite and plans for Northern Africa. I didn't like the fact that the Obama Administration silently encouraged it.







Post#475 at 09-12-2011 01:28 AM by Chas'88 [at In between Pennsylvania & Pennsyltucky joined Nov 2008 #posts 9,432]
---
09-12-2011, 01:28 AM #475
Join Date
Nov 2008
Location
In between Pennsylvania & Pennsyltucky
Posts
9,432

Quote Originally Posted by KaiserD2 View Post
A serious 4T is hitting the Middle East. Turkey is challenging the legality of Israel's Gaza blockade in the World Court and has downgraded diplomatic relations with Israel. Egyptian rioters took over the Israeli embassy in Cairo. And the Palestinian independence declaration is looming and will be endorsed by the General Assembly. And I haven't even mentioned Iran! Ironically, Iran, Turkey and eventually Egypt were de facto allies of Israel for much of its modern existence--but no more. I don't know where this is going but it's big.
No offense to those who are Jewish, but Israel has been overly aggressive for a while IMO. Call it "neccessary for survival" or whatever else you wish, but the fact remains that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. It's reaping what its sewn.

Cliche-filled, but to the point.

~Chas'88
"There have always been people who say: "The war will be over someday." I say there's no guarantee the war will ever be over. Naturally a brief intermission is conceivable. Maybe the war needs a breather, a war can even break its neck, so to speak. But the kings and emperors, not to mention the pope, will always come to its help in adversity. ON the whole, I'd say this war has very little to worry about, it'll live to a ripe old age."
-----------------------------------------