Generational Dynamics
Fourth Turning Forum Archive


Popular links:
Generational Dynamics Web Site
Generational Dynamics Forum
Fourth Turning Archive home page
New Fourth Turning Forum

Thread: Evidence We're in a Third--or Fourth--Turning - Page 152







Post#3776 at 08-15-2002 04:39 PM by The Wonkette [at Arlington, VA 1956 joined Jul 2002 #posts 9,209]
---
08-15-2002, 04:39 PM #3776
Join Date
Jul 2002
Location
Arlington, VA 1956
Posts
9,209

Ease of Immigrating Illegally

Justmom, as the terrorists showed, it is fairly easy to immigrate here illegally from Europe, Africa, the Middle East, or Asia. All you have to do is get a tourist or student visa and then just don't leave. Of course, you have to be able to afford air fare, but the fees coyotes are charging these days is about as steep.
I want people to know that peace is possible even in this stupid day and age. Prem Rawat, June 8, 2008







Post#3777 at 08-15-2002 04:50 PM by Leo Schulte [at Toledo, Ohio joined Oct 2001 #posts 151]
---
08-15-2002, 04:50 PM #3777
Join Date
Oct 2001
Location
Toledo, Ohio
Posts
151

Quote Originally Posted by Sanford
"What happens to our national soul, if the borders are closed or nearly closed? The hope that America has signified to the huddled masses, indeed reified, throughout the centuries, will be gone."

Actually, immigration into America has from time to time increased to a lot and decreased to nearly nothing. America has survived both the "low immigration" times and the "high immigration" times.

It is supposed to be part of the turnings cycle, you know.
Right, but the supposition from "justmom" above was "closed borders", and that would be something new, rather than restricting immigration within certain criteria.

I should mention that the ease of obtaining student visas again goes back to the willingness of foreign students to enter the math and science areas, and the number of positions needed in those fields. I suspect few Indians or Asians come here to major in things like sociology or popular culture or other fuzzy subject areas. (No offense to those out there who have majored in these areas, but I do believe a Ph.D. in Physics takes a rarer ability than a Ph.D. in "American Studies".)







Post#3778 at 08-15-2002 05:03 PM by The Wonkette [at Arlington, VA 1956 joined Jul 2002 #posts 9,209]
---
08-15-2002, 05:03 PM #3778
Join Date
Jul 2002
Location
Arlington, VA 1956
Posts
9,209

Justmom, Ease of Immigration, and Closed Borders

Quote Originally Posted by Leo Schulte
Right, but the supposition from "justmom" above was "closed borders", and that would be something new, rather than restricting immigration within certain criteria.

I should mention that the ease of obtaining student visas again goes back to the willingness of foreign students to enter the math and science areas, and the number of positions needed in those fields. I suspect few Indians or Asians come here to major in things like sociology or popular culture or other fuzzy subject areas. (No offense to those out there who have majored in these areas, but I do believe a Ph.D. in Physics takes a rarer ability than a Ph.D. in "American Studies".)
I read Justmom differently. She seemed to be comparing the difficulty with immigrating legally from Europe with the ease of crossing the border illegally from Mexico. I was pointing out that it is fairly simple today to immigrate illegally from Europe. I should point out that a substantial number of Mexicans do immigrate legally each year, getting sponsors, waiting in line, and all that. Its just as hard for them as it is for Europeans, except that they may be more likely to have close family relatives who can sponsor them.







Post#3779 at 08-15-2002 05:35 PM by Stonewall Patton [at joined Sep 2001 #posts 3,857]
---
08-15-2002, 05:35 PM #3779
Join Date
Sep 2001
Posts
3,857

Here is an interesting one. It is a Reuters story from 11 August which I cannot locate from any source location. The ABC News link is no longer active and I can find nothing by searching the Reuters wire. As far as I can tell, it must be yet another one the White house successfully coerced a news outlet into pulling.

According to the article, not only does the Bush administration reserve the right to arbitrarily label you, an American citizen, an "enemy combatant," but it also reserves the right to execute you summarily, bypassing all pretense of due process. Not in America, huh?


Copied at www.bartcop.com/0866.htm:


http://www.abcnews.go.com/wire/World...00811_493.html


Bush OK's Summary Executions Of Some Designated As Terrorists
8-12-2002

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In a surprise move sure to raise outcries from foreign governments, civil liberties
groups and others, The White House today announced with little fanfare that effective immediately, certain
individuals whom President Bush or other high-level Administration members have designated as terrorists
are subject to summary execution by either Homeland Security operatives, U.S. intelligence operatives,
and in some cases by U.S. military personnel.

The presidential directive applies to both U.S. and foreign citizens,
both within and outside the United States territory.

The White House gave notice of the new policy in as quiet a way as possible, making the announcement
late Sunday evening from Crawford, Texas. The unprecedented move is thought certain to generate a
firestorm of protest from numerous quarters.







Post#3780 at 08-15-2002 05:42 PM by Stonewall Patton [at joined Sep 2001 #posts 3,857]
---
08-15-2002, 05:42 PM #3780
Join Date
Sep 2001
Posts
3,857








Post#3781 at 08-15-2002 08:55 PM by Metanoos [at Mountain View, CA joined Oct 2001 #posts 13]
---
08-15-2002, 08:55 PM #3781
Join Date
Oct 2001
Location
Mountain View, CA
Posts
13

I agree with Sanford. Immigration ebbs and flows in what seems like a natural process that roughly follows S&H's saecular cycle. I've seen the argument made that one thing that helped make the Great Immigration of 1890-1920 so successful was that IT STOPPED for several decades. This gave our society time for immigrants and their children to assimilate and at the same time change America forever.

From the data I've seen, immigration usually crashes at the outset of a 4T and remains relatively low through the next 1T before returning to a higher relative level in an early-to-mid 2T. But the Great Power Cycle seems to be a little different in that the immigration dearth seems to have come about 10 years early. Perhaps the reaction to the Red terrorist attacks of 1919 left a little 4T deposit, if you will, even though the country clearly had an overall 3T reaction. Any comments on this would interest me greatly.

In regards to now, August 2002, I see a premature 4T struggling to survive. In regards to the immigration cycle specifically, I see that some steps have been taken to curb immigration, though relatively minor steps. I also see some indications that America may become percieved as a less attractive place for foreigners to migrate to (between media-hyped terrorist threats and financial meltdowns, plus Ashcroft's actions, etc . . ).

That last part is important. During both the Revolution and the Civil War, my understanding is that immigration dropped not so much because immigrants weren't legally welcome, but rather because who wanted to come here during so much turmoil? Likewise, even if the 1920-24 reaction to immigration had not occurred, I think immigration would have plummeted by itself from 1929-1933 and stayed low for some time.

S&H's theory leads me to believe that there will be a relative drop in immigration (be it from internal restrictions and/or externally-percieved loss of desirability) sometime in this decade. If 9/11-WorldCom was the initial trigger, then soon, if not, then by 2009. Immigration will then stay relatively low until the 2040's. Who knows.

And Stonewall Patton, I was not aware of that new policy regarding summary executions of government-declared, "non-combantant" citizens. Wow. Any other links for that you can think of?!?!?!? I would like to read more.

My guess is that either last October's "Nuke in Manhattan" scare frightened the daylights out of some members of the government or they know something similarly horrendous that still threatens us that WE do not know about. Blatant power grabs by a power-mad A.G. could be another explanation of course.







Post#3782 at 08-15-2002 09:05 PM by Metanoos [at Mountain View, CA joined Oct 2001 #posts 13]
---
08-15-2002, 09:05 PM #3782
Join Date
Oct 2001
Location
Mountain View, CA
Posts
13

Immigration and 3T/4T

** I am going to post this again to make room for Mr. Ashcroft's picture above**

I agree with Sanford. Immigration ebbs and flows in what seems like a natural process that roughly follows S&H's saecular cycle. I've seen the argument made that one thing that helped make the Great Immigration of 1890-1920 so successful was that IT STOPPED for several decades. This gave our society time for immigrants and their children to assimilate and at the same time change America forever.

From the data I've seen, immigration usually crashes at the outset of a 4T and remains relatively low through the next 1T before returning to a higher relative level in an early-to-mid 2T. But the Great Power Cycle seems to be a little different in that the immigration dearth seems to have come about 10 years early. Perhaps the reaction to the Red terrorist attacks of 1919 left a little 4T deposit, if you will, even though the country clearly had an overall 3T reaction. Any comments on this would interest me greatly.

In regards to now, August 2002, I see a premature 4T struggling to survive. In regards to the immigration cycle specifically, I see that some steps have been taken to curb immigration, though relatively minor steps. I also see some indications that America may become percieved as a less attractive place for foreigners to migrate to (between media-hyped terrorist threats and financial meltdowns, plus Ashcroft's actions, etc . . ).

That last part is important. During both the Revolution and the Civil War, my understanding is that immigration dropped not so much because immigrants weren't legally welcome, but rather because who wanted to come here during so much turmoil? Likewise, even if the 1920-24 reaction to immigration had not occurred, I think immigration would have plummeted by itself from 1929-1933 and stayed low for some time.

S&H's theory leads me to believe that there will be a relative drop in immigration (be it from internal restrictions and/or externally-percieved loss of desirability) sometime in this decade. If 9/11-WorldCom was the initial trigger, then soon, if not, then by 2009. Immigration will then stay relatively low until the 2040's. Who knows.

And Stonewall Patton, I was not aware of that new policy regarding summary executions of government-declared, "non-combantant" citizens. Wow. Any other links for that you can think of?!?!?!? I would like to read more.

My guess is that either last October's "Nuke in Manhattan" scare frightened the daylights out of some members of the government or they know something similarly horrendous that still threatens us that WE do not know about. Blatant power grabs by a power-mad A.G. could be another explanation of course.







Post#3783 at 08-15-2002 09:48 PM by HopefulCynic68 [at joined Sep 2001 #posts 9,412]
---
08-15-2002, 09:48 PM #3783
Join Date
Sep 2001
Posts
9,412

Quote Originally Posted by Kiff '61
It does look like the US is doing its best to piss off just about everyone. Even our good buddy Vicente Fox isn't too happy with us right now.
Kiff, there's really nothing we can do to not piss them off. They aren't really upset at us for what we're doing or planning to do, they're angry at us for what we are. The actions they keep talking about are just excuses.







Post#3784 at 08-15-2002 09:52 PM by HopefulCynic68 [at joined Sep 2001 #posts 9,412]
---
08-15-2002, 09:52 PM #3784
Join Date
Sep 2001
Posts
9,412

Re: Illegal Immigration and Borders

Quote Originally Posted by Leo Schulte
As has been discussed on the "Invasions from Latin America/China" topic in the "Future" section, the issue is extremely complicated and hits the nature of Anerica.

What happens to our national soul, if the borders are closed or nearly closed? The hope that America has signified to the huddled masses, indeed reified, throughout the centuries, will be gone.
Let's not kid ourselves. Along with "I lift my lamp beside the Golden Door", which truly is a basic part of American psychology, there is an equally strong strain of "those damned foreigners". America alternates between welcoming immigrants and wanting to slam the door, with the later sentiment usually gaining strength during late 3T and 4T.

Also, it's a nasty reality that it's much, much easier to assimilate Western Europeans than it is people from other cultures. Many people want that not to be true, but it is true.







Post#3785 at 08-15-2002 09:53 PM by AlexMnWi [at Minneapolis joined Jun 2002 #posts 1,622]
---
08-15-2002, 09:53 PM #3785
Join Date
Jun 2002
Location
Minneapolis
Posts
1,622

:roll:

Quote Originally Posted by Stonewall Patton
1. Isn't that supposed to happen in a 4T anyway? That way we get new Silents.

2. It's fake anyway, which makes it...

3. It's stupid, which makes it...

4. It's Pointless.

1987 INTP







Post#3786 at 08-15-2002 10:11 PM by Stonewall Patton [at joined Sep 2001 #posts 3,857]
---
08-15-2002, 10:11 PM #3786
Join Date
Sep 2001
Posts
3,857

Quote Originally Posted by HopefulCynic68
Quote Originally Posted by Kiff '61
It does look like the US is doing its best to piss off just about everyone. Even our good buddy Vicente Fox isn't too happy with us right now.
Kiff, there's really nothing we can do to not piss them off. They aren't really upset at us for what we're doing or planning to do, they're angry at us for what we are. The actions they keep talking about are just excuses.

BS. The US sets up puppet regimes to rule over them and, being human, they quite naturally object. Americans would object as well if the shoes were reversed. There is nothing the least bit difficult to understand about this situation but the defenders of empire continue to rationalize any excuse to stay the imperial course. Remove the US troops from their soil and quit setting up puppet regimes to rule over them and, being human, they will no longer have any need or desire to bother with Americans. Despite all the propaganda, there is nothing the least bit difficult to understand about this.







Post#3787 at 08-15-2002 10:25 PM by Stonewall Patton [at joined Sep 2001 #posts 3,857]
---
08-15-2002, 10:25 PM #3787
Join Date
Sep 2001
Posts
3,857

Re: :roll:

Quote Originally Posted by AlexMnWi
Quote Originally Posted by Stonewall Patton
1. Isn't that supposed to happen in a 4T anyway?
Obviously, our worst fears about our educational system have been realized.







Post#3788 at 08-15-2002 11:24 PM by HopefulCynic68 [at joined Sep 2001 #posts 9,412]
---
08-15-2002, 11:24 PM #3788
Join Date
Sep 2001
Posts
9,412

Quote Originally Posted by Stonewall Patton
Quote Originally Posted by HopefulCynic68
Quote Originally Posted by Kiff '61
It does look like the US is doing its best to piss off just about everyone. Even our good buddy Vicente Fox isn't too happy with us right now.
Kiff, there's really nothing we can do to not piss them off. They aren't really upset at us for what we're doing or planning to do, they're angry at us for what we are. The actions they keep talking about are just excuses.

BS. The US sets up puppet regimes to rule over them and, being human, they quite naturally object. Americans would object as well if the shoes were reversed. There is nothing the least bit difficult to understand about this situation but the defenders of empire continue to rationalize any excuse to stay the imperial course. Remove the US troops from their soil and quit setting up puppet regimes to rule over them and, being human, they will no longer have any need or desire to bother with Americans. Despite all the propaganda, there is nothing the least bit difficult to understand about this.
The strongest is always hated. It's true we've done a lot of idiot things, but if we ceased and desisted entirely, our mere existence would still infuriate huge swaths of the world. We haven't set up puppet regimes over Europe, but that doesn't make them like us any better.







Post#3789 at 08-15-2002 11:37 PM by cbailey [at B. 1950 joined Sep 2001 #posts 1,559]
---
08-15-2002, 11:37 PM #3789
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
B. 1950
Posts
1,559

[quote="Stonewall Patton"]
Quote Originally Posted by Kiff '61
Stonewall, how credible is this Al Martin? His columns keep getting creepier and creepier. Is he telling it like it is, or does he have a personal axe to grind with the Bushies or something?

This is really scary stuff if it's true.

Kiff, I have the same questions you do. I can tell you that he does indeed have an axe to grind in that the Bushes owe him $200,000 or something like that from something having to do with Iran-Contra, and he openly stated this in a column a few months back. Furthermore, I think we have seen evidence in his past columns of that axe influencing him. If you recall his comparing of a new US postage stamp to Nazi symbology, that was definitely a little over the top. Without a doubt, he has an axe to grind, he has freely admitted it and explained the nature of it, and I think it is fair to say that it has affected his objectivity in the past."





So does this 57 cent stamp exist??
If it does, it certainly looks nazi-like. What's the story?

And DID Ed McMahon make those ads for Neighborhod Watch?
And were they as creepy as they are described?

The National Neighborhood Watch Web Site used to be run by the Sheriffs.
Now it has George Bush's face and Eagles plastered all over.

Yes, very creepy.







Post#3790 at 08-16-2002 12:31 AM by Stonewall Patton [at joined Sep 2001 #posts 3,857]
---
08-16-2002, 12:31 AM #3790
Join Date
Sep 2001
Posts
3,857

Quote Originally Posted by HopefulCynic68
We haven't set up puppet regimes over Europe, but that doesn't make them like us any better.
And you will note that Europeans are not committing "acts of terror" against Americans either. You reap what you sow. The bitch of it is that only a small cadre of elitists sowed this. Yet the rest of us must reap what these base types have sown.







Post#3791 at 08-16-2002 01:08 AM by Stonewall Patton [at joined Sep 2001 #posts 3,857]
---
08-16-2002, 01:08 AM #3791
Join Date
Sep 2001
Posts
3,857

Quote Originally Posted by cbailey

Re: Al Martin's claims:

So does this 57 cent stamp exist??
If it does, it certainly looks nazi-like. What's the story?
Are you saying that you believe that the Bush administration specifically intended to promote Nazi symbology as their private little joke? I really do have a hard time believing that. I don't doubt for a minute that they crave the absolute power of the Third Reich. In fact, their actions make it obvious that they do. But even if some of them are sick enough to privately sing praises to the glory of the Third Reich, I cannot believe that they would overtly "honor" the Third Reich in this way. That would be about the sickest joke imaginable and I cannot see where they would be that open about their depravity if it indeed runs that deep.

BTW, there were very elementary factual errors in Martin's account of that stamp which I posted here at the time. I cannot remember precisely what those errors were but I believe in one case Martin passed off a term from a mineral hardness scale as one from a coloring scale. Did someone hoodwink him with this information or was this his idea of a joke? There is a distinct possiblity that Martin is propagating disinformation. Yes, Martin does also pass off some good information, but he still needs to be read with caution.







Post#3792 at 08-16-2002 04:33 AM by Rain Man [at Bendigo, Australia joined Jun 2001 #posts 1,303]
---
08-16-2002, 04:33 AM #3792
Join Date
Jun 2001
Location
Bendigo, Australia
Posts
1,303

I do not know it is funny or not, however I will post it.


State finally puts end to WWII

16Aug02

SOUTH Australia has declared an official end to World War II - 57 years after the halt to hostilities in Europe and the Pacific.

The declaration was necessary to revoke extraordinary powers that were bestowed on the state government during the war years.
Premier Mike Rann said the government had just discovered that the Emergency Powers Act of 1941 had never been repealed.

"It is a quirk of history that World War II was never proclaimed at an end in this state," Mr Rann said.

"The Act was supposed to expire at the time that peace treaties were signed, as they were at the end of World War I.

"However, peace treaties were never signed because the Axis powers surrendered.

"In 1952 the Act was amended to enable the state government to issue a proclamation declaring World War II had ended.

"But there is no evidence that the proclamation was ever made."

Mr Rann said the powers given to the state government included the right to remove any civil population from any portion of the state and to authorise any person to enter or search any premises.

It could also regulate and ration the production and supply of food, water, fuel, gas and electricity.

The premier said it became necessary to officially revoke the Emergency Power Act because it was now considered in breach of national competition laws.







Post#3793 at 08-16-2002 06:10 AM by Stonewall Patton [at joined Sep 2001 #posts 3,857]
---
08-16-2002, 06:10 AM #3793
Join Date
Sep 2001
Posts
3,857

Re: :roll:

Quote Originally Posted by AlexMnWi

2. It's fake anyway, which makes it...

3. It's stupid, which makes it...

4. It's Pointless.









Post#3794 at 08-16-2002 09:38 AM by Child of Socrates [at Cybrarian from America's Dairyland, 1961 cohort joined Sep 2001 #posts 14,092]
---
08-16-2002, 09:38 AM #3794
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Cybrarian from America's Dairyland, 1961 cohort
Posts
14,092

Quote Originally Posted by HopefulCynic68
Quote Originally Posted by Kiff '61
It does look like the US is doing its best to piss off just about everyone. Even our good buddy Vicente Fox isn't too happy with us right now.
Kiff, there's really nothing we can do to not piss them off. They aren't really upset at us for what we're doing or planning to do, they're angry at us for what we are. The actions they keep talking about are just excuses.
If we stopped executing people, it might help.

IIRC, you and I are both opposed to the death penalty, though perhaps not for the same reasons.

Sure, there are people in the world who will always hate us for "what we are." They envy our freedom and our wealth. They despise (with some justification, IMHO) our trashy pop culture.

But Stonewall is right; when we support regimes that are favorable to our economic interests but that oppress their own people, then we are wrong, morally as well as politically. And I think this country needs to find a way to disengage from this kind of game-playing.







Post#3795 at 08-16-2002 10:10 AM by Rain Man [at Bendigo, Australia joined Jun 2001 #posts 1,303]
---
08-16-2002, 10:10 AM #3795
Join Date
Jun 2001
Location
Bendigo, Australia
Posts
1,303

I do have a feeling that people on this group are making assumptions about the Americian economy and political developments which I think are frankly untrue.

Despite the fall in Wall Street the US Economy has remained strong with unemployment lower than just about every other western nation. America?s levels of crime are far lower than that of Britain, France or Australia. The Political momention in the United States still remains firmly on the right and GW Bush is a quite underrated president, I do think he could show quite insightful political intelligence in the next few years.

Maybe we might be headed into a politically conservative 4T; there is a prescient for it. Britain in the Revolutionary war Crisis (which climaxed with the fall of the Bastille).


The Reluctant President
Frank Bruni's insight into Bush

By Andrew Sullivan

Despite the mounds of ink expended on the current president of the United States, he's still in many ways a mystery. Before September 11, he was widely ridiculed in the press - especially abroad - as a know-nothing, word-mangling, privileged hick who barely won the election. After September 11, his measured and calm response to the attack, his handling of the international crisis, his oratorical skills, and his deft management of the military have given an altogether different impression. In a matter of months, the conventional image of Bush has been effectively whip-lashed. And now that we have a little distance from the alleged turning point of last September, the result is unnervingly incoherent. Who, after all, is the real Bush? The jokester or the statesman? The bumbler or the war leader? The cipher or the captain?

A terrific, if modest, little book, "Ambling Into History," has just attempted an answer to that question and it has Washington chatting. It's by the New York Times' political reporter, Frank Bruni, who covered Bush during the election campaign. Bruni's no conservative; in fact, he's a moderately liberal man working for a left-liberal paper. But he's a good reporter and, because he wrote fair columns on Bush throughout the campaign, became a favorite of the president-to-be. Dubya called him "Panchito" - a diminutive, Spanish version of Frank. He'd pinch Panchito's cheeks, hug him from time to time, and tease him about his bosses. "At least twice, on the campaign plane," Bruni writes, "I felt someone's hands closing tight on my throat and turned around to see the outstretched arms of the future president of the United States, a devilish and delighted gleam in his eyes. He once even put his index fingers in my ears to illustrate that a comment he was about to make would be off the record. On another occasion, he grabbed the sides of my head with his hands, pressed his forehead against mine and made a sound not unlike that of a moderately exasperated pooch."

This is the goofy Bush, the man who allegedly started waving at Stevie Wonder at a recent Washington concert, only to realize his stupidity and crack up at the whole interaction. This is the Bush who started a "stickball" team at college and christened it "the Nads," so as to ensure that the chants from the stands would be "Go Nads! Go Nads!" This is the Bush who does a mean Dr. Evil impression from Austin Powers (one of his favorite movies), who "when he ate French fries, dipped them into puddles of ketchup deeper and broader than anyone over the age of twelve typically amasses," and who, when asked what he had in common with Tony Blair ventured Colgate toothpaste. One of his favorite gags was going up to bald friends and colleagues, laying his bare palms on their heads and intoning like Billy Graham, "Heal!" Like most jokes, these are all a matter of taste. But if, like me, your most treasured videos are Animal House, Monty Python and the Holy Grail and Airplane!, you might get along with the current occupant of the White House quite well.

But does this make Bush unserious or somehow dumb? On the latter question, few but hardcore Democratic partisans in Washington still dispute the man's sharp intelligence. He has mangled words, but he has hardly mangled his politics. From beating a popular incumbent governor of Texas to winning a landslide second term as governor, he kept turning his opponents into political puree. Against an incumbent vice-president who should have won in a landslide, Bush eked out a victory and, with shrewd tactics, played the post-election recount game better than Gore. Before September 11, he barely dipped below 57 percent approval ratings, and since he has barely hovered below 80 percent. This record is not that of a stupid person. And, of course, on a simple level, there was never any evidence that he was the moron he was made out to be. Bush got better marks in college than Gore or John McCain. He's a graduate of Yale and Harvard. As Bruni points out, the current president is also "a pretty steady consumer of books." Bruni admits his early dismissal of Bush's book-smarts was more prejudice than reality.

The truth is that Bush is both serious and unserious. He larks about but he also concentrates. He started prepping for his campaign debates with Gore months before they happened, and beat Gore handily in all three. His sometimes hilarious locutions are not a function of stupidity or dyslexia. They are a kind of genetic defect. His father was far worse. But no-one accused the father of stupidity. Dubya's occasional recitation of stock phrases is also not because he can't think of anything else, or doesn't know anything else. They're part of his famous ability to maintain message discipline, even at the expense of making himself look stupid. To understand his hesitancy to go off the cuff, you have to put yourself in the shoes of someone whose every word is recorded and every mistake read back to him. What's amazing in retrospect is not that he hasn't screwed up verbally plenty of times - but how few occasions there have been in which it really mattered. And then there are the simple urban legends. He is renowned for having said, for example, "is our children learning?" One Democratic party hack even published an anti-Bush book with that as the title. What Bush actually said was, "Is ... are children learning?" He started to say one thing and then said another. By making 'are' 'our,' his opponents thought they had located his obvious weakness.

They didn't. As Bruni realized, Bush's simplicity, his gaffes, his colloquialisms, his goofing around, actually turned into a political advantage. 'I always got the sense," Bruni writes, "that his antics were in part an acknowledgement or assertion that a well-adjusted person could not approach all of the obligatory appearances, grandiose pageantry and forced gallantry toward the news media with a totally straight face. It made him likable. It made him real." Compared to the straight-laced, humorless, pious Gore, Bush was a godsend to the country's culture - a bit like electing Rory Bremner to succeed Tony Blair.

But the other side to Bruni's portrait is an underlying gravity that keeps the lightness anchored. Like many deeply religious men, Bush engages the world with a certain detachment, and that detachment can sometimes be expressed in frivolity, irony, fun, or self-mockery. There is a very bearable lightness about being Bush. But he can only be so playful because he is so anchored. He is connected to faith but he is also connected to a profound love of his country and its destiny. This connection is, like all patriotism, rooted not in the head but the heart. At one point in a summer lull in the campaign, Bush spoke with Bruni on the campaign plane and inexplicably got teary-eyed. Looking back on his campaign, he was asked about his feelings if Gore were to win. "Seriously, I would respect that. I'm not going to like it. But this is democracy," he said. He went on: "I love the system and I love the country. I love what America stands for. I don't want to sound Pollyanna-ish about it, but I do... I am so honored to be one of two coming down the stretch. I am." He meant it. And tears welled up.

One of his most memorable moments in the days after September 11 was when tears came again. He was in the Oval Office and he was asked how these events had affected him. "Well," Bush said, "I don't think about myself right now. I think about the families, the children. I am a loving guy." And his voice cracked. That's when the country bonded. And only from the depths of such sorrow can come the iron determination to see the crisis through, to ensure to the best of his ability that it would never happen again. His emotional core is connected to his lightness of spirit. He is secure in what he loves. And the very simplicity and depth of his patriotism is more in tune with most Americans than with some other members of the media or political elite. That's why the bond is so strong. And that's why it will last.

But perhaps the most striking thing about Bruni's account is its picture of an essentially reluctant president. It took Bush a long time to be reconciled to the huge sacrifices - of privacy, leisure, routine, family - that becoming president would entail. In the campaign, he'd long to get back home; he missed his children; he brought his own pillow at all times to remind him of the familiar. Even now, he loves being on his Texas ranch, he carves out immovable personal time, he is religious about his workouts, he leaves work early. This isn't merely good management style. It's a statement of what's important. It's about not losing yourself, or your familiar landmarks and habits, while you enter truly unknown and terrifying territory. At an almost ridiculous level, you can see this entirely in one simple incident. One on particularly grueling campaign flight, Bush "glanced in horror at the slivers of sushi that we had been served during the flight and held his peanut butter and jelly sandwich high like a chalice. 'This is heaven, right here,' he proclaimed."

You can and probably should make fun of this. But at a deeper level, it's also revealing. Bush knows what he knows. He knows who he is. He likes who he is. And this small piece of wisdom is doubtless what keeps him sane. He has an instinctive understanding of limits, of what can and cannot be done, of the human scale by which all political achievements must be measured. It's redolent of a natural, temperamental conservatism that prefers, in Michael Oakeshott's words, "the familiar to the unknown, the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss." That doesn't mean that such an instinctively conservative person like Bush cannot be energetic, or wage war. In fact, I think Bush's rage at the disruption to the meaning of America on September 11 is the fuel for his ruthless determination to fight back and win. So lightness begets seriousness, detachment begets engagement, and a natural conservatism begets a determined and adventurous war. These are just some of the more interesting paradoxes of its man once dismissed as a bumbling moron. And he's only a little over a year into his first term.







Post#3796 at 08-16-2002 10:59 AM by The Wonkette [at Arlington, VA 1956 joined Jul 2002 #posts 9,209]
---
08-16-2002, 10:59 AM #3796
Join Date
Jul 2002
Location
Arlington, VA 1956
Posts
9,209

Re: Illegal Immigration and Borders

Quote Originally Posted by HopefulCynic68

Let's not kid ourselves. Along with "I lift my lamp beside the Golden Door", which truly is a basic part of American psychology, there is an equally strong strain of "those damned foreigners". America alternates between welcoming immigrants and wanting to slam the door, with the later sentiment usually gaining strength during late 3T and 4T.

Also, it's a nasty reality that it's much, much easier to assimilate Western Europeans than it is people from other cultures. Many people want that not to be true, but it is true.
Hopeful, the assimilation of the Irish and then the Eastern Europeans was not an easy thing. If you look at 19th century definitions of "racial groups", you will find Italians, Poles, and Eastern European Jews considered to be inferior races; indeed, even the Irish were so tarred. And of course, the Eastern and Southern Europeans did not speak English.

Back in WWI, large numbers of recent immigrants and their first-generation sons were rejected for military service because of "low intelligence". Back in the twenties, we all know about Italian gangstas, but there were lots of Jewish thugs too. And of course, there was a strong Yiddish culture and lots of foreign-language presses.
I want people to know that peace is possible even in this stupid day and age. Prem Rawat, June 8, 2008







Post#3797 at 08-16-2002 02:22 PM by Stonewall Patton [at joined Sep 2001 #posts 3,857]
---
08-16-2002, 02:22 PM #3797
Join Date
Sep 2001
Posts
3,857

Quote Originally Posted by Tristan Jones
I do have a feeling that people on this group are making assumptions about the Americian economy and political developments which I think are frankly untrue.
So that 50% of value which people have lost in their IRAs and 401(k)s is scheduled to be magically restored on some day next week or next month? The real estate bubble in fact is in no danger of bursting? The banks in fact will not have to write off their massive loans to these now bankrupt corporations? Pro-Bush Republican analyst Larry Kudlow was only kidding when he stated that the US narrowly averted a bank run a week or two ago?

Despite the fall in Wall Street the US Economy has remained strong with unemployment lower than just about every other western nation.
Investor confidence is way down...and for good reason. And if you want to compare unemployment rates, you have to determine what methodology the US government is using this week in order to doctor the numbers. What are they calling full employment this week? All but 8% of the population working?

The Political momention in the United States still remains firmly on the right
Is this why the Bush administration has been implementing the Democrats' agenda?

and GW Bush is a quite underrated president, I do think he could show quite insightful political intelligence in the next few years.
Pinnochio was fiction. It was not a true story.







Post#3798 at 08-16-2002 02:34 PM by AlexMnWi [at Minneapolis joined Jun 2002 #posts 1,622]
---
08-16-2002, 02:34 PM #3798
Join Date
Jun 2002
Location
Minneapolis
Posts
1,622

Quote Originally Posted by Stonewall Patton
Quote Originally Posted by Tristan Jones
I do have a feeling that people on this group are making assumptions about the Americian economy and political developments which I think are frankly untrue.
So that 50% of value which people have lost in their IRAs and 401(k)s is scheduled to be magically restored on some day next week or next month? The real estate bubble in fact is in no danger of bursting? The banks in fact will not have to write off their massive loans to these now bankrupt corporations? Pro-Bush Republican analyst Larry Kudlow was only kidding when he stated that the US narrowly averted a bank run a week or two ago?

Despite the fall in Wall Street the US Economy has remained strong with unemployment lower than just about every other western nation.
Investor confidence is way down...and for good reason. And if you want to compare unemployment rates, you have to determine what methodology the US government is using this week in order to doctor the numbers. What are they calling full employment this week? All but 8% of the population working?

The Political momention in the United States still remains firmly on the right
Is this why the Bush administration has been implementing the Democrats' agenda?

and GW Bush is a quite underrated president, I do think he could show quite insightful political intelligence in the next few years.
Pinnochio was fiction. It was not a true story.
Then how do you plan on blaming Bush for the stock market slide which began an entire 372 days before he took office?
1987 INTP







Post#3799 at 08-16-2002 02:39 PM by Croakmore [at The hazardous reefs of Silentium joined Nov 2001 #posts 2,426]
---
08-16-2002, 02:39 PM #3799
Join Date
Nov 2001
Location
The hazardous reefs of Silentium
Posts
2,426

Quote Originally Posted by Sanford
The point is, a person's "signature" is a personal expression, and is outside the context of the body of the post. It's not like a sign at a baseball game; it's more like a sign on a the front door of a person's home.

Yes, that analogy is flawed, but it's sort of like that.

What Croaker seems to be saying is that religious sentiment in a person's signature is verboten. That seems rude and intrusive. What else is verboten? Philosophy? Movie quotes? Jokes?

What Croker said is "un-American" if you ask me, trying to shout down someone's free speech rights. Tristan's signature doesn't get in the way of this forum at all, so what's the problem?
I've come around to agreeing with you, Sanford. I was wrong. I overreacted in my own desiccated ignorance.







Post#3800 at 08-16-2002 02:46 PM by Mikebert [at Kalamazoo MI joined Jul 2001 #posts 4,502]
---
08-16-2002, 02:46 PM #3800
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
Kalamazoo MI
Posts
4,502

The stock slide occurred because of the bubble. The bubble was made possible by the Stock Market Bubble Act of 1997 (It actually had a different name that I can't recall--but that was its objective). So if you have to blame someone blame Congress in 1997.
-----------------------------------------