So when does David Bonior go on trial?To summarize, those who dissent seek to voice an opinion, while those who commit treason knowingly inflict damage on their own society.
So when does David Bonior go on trial?To summarize, those who dissent seek to voice an opinion, while those who commit treason knowingly inflict damage on their own society.
So when does David Bonior go on trial?To summarize, those who dissent seek to voice an opinion, while those who commit treason knowingly inflict damage on their own society.
who's that, and why should he?Originally Posted by Chris '68
TK
who's that, and why should he?Originally Posted by Chris '68
TK
who's that, and why should he?Originally Posted by Chris '68
TK
Does this mean I win the game?Originally Posted by TrollKing
Does this mean I win the game?Originally Posted by TrollKing
Does this mean I win the game?Originally Posted by TrollKing
sure. if it makes you feel better, it can mean that.Originally Posted by Chris '68
but seriously, who is that and why try him for treason? i honestly do not know.
TK
sure. if it makes you feel better, it can mean that.Originally Posted by Chris '68
but seriously, who is that and why try him for treason? i honestly do not know.
TK
sure. if it makes you feel better, it can mean that.Originally Posted by Chris '68
but seriously, who is that and why try him for treason? i honestly do not know.
TK
And your little dog, McDermett, too!
And your little dog, McDermett, too!
And your little dog, McDermett, too!
Click and find wisdom, my fellow Nomad:Originally Posted by TrollKing
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,64657,00.html
Click and find wisdom, my fellow Nomad:Originally Posted by TrollKing
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,64657,00.html
Click and find wisdom, my fellow Nomad:Originally Posted by TrollKing
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,64657,00.html
oh, brother.Originally Posted by Chris '68
according the definition of treason we're working with here, a traitor is one who "knowingly inflict[s] damage on their own society". let's see.... they apparently (according to the article you posted the link to):
went to iraq....
"said the Bush administration should give weapons inspections a chance to work before taking any military action"....
"suggested that the sanctions..... led to the starvation and malnutrition of Iraqi children, and the death of 50,000 annually"....
"said that U.S. and British airplanes have been bombing illegitimate targets"....
"said that he thought 'the president would mislead the American people' in order to justify action on Iraq"....
which part of that is known to inflict damage to our society? it may inflict "damage" (in the metaphorical sense) to the administration's policy, but that's part and parcel of politics. no, i'm talking about real damage, on par with espionage or sabotage, to our society. i think it's a bit overzealous to claim that is what happened here.
TK
oh, brother.Originally Posted by Chris '68
according the definition of treason we're working with here, a traitor is one who "knowingly inflict[s] damage on their own society". let's see.... they apparently (according to the article you posted the link to):
went to iraq....
"said the Bush administration should give weapons inspections a chance to work before taking any military action"....
"suggested that the sanctions..... led to the starvation and malnutrition of Iraqi children, and the death of 50,000 annually"....
"said that U.S. and British airplanes have been bombing illegitimate targets"....
"said that he thought 'the president would mislead the American people' in order to justify action on Iraq"....
which part of that is known to inflict damage to our society? it may inflict "damage" (in the metaphorical sense) to the administration's policy, but that's part and parcel of politics. no, i'm talking about real damage, on par with espionage or sabotage, to our society. i think it's a bit overzealous to claim that is what happened here.
TK
oh, brother.Originally Posted by Chris '68
according the definition of treason we're working with here, a traitor is one who "knowingly inflict[s] damage on their own society". let's see.... they apparently (according to the article you posted the link to):
went to iraq....
"said the Bush administration should give weapons inspections a chance to work before taking any military action"....
"suggested that the sanctions..... led to the starvation and malnutrition of Iraqi children, and the death of 50,000 annually"....
"said that U.S. and British airplanes have been bombing illegitimate targets"....
"said that he thought 'the president would mislead the American people' in order to justify action on Iraq"....
which part of that is known to inflict damage to our society? it may inflict "damage" (in the metaphorical sense) to the administration's policy, but that's part and parcel of politics. no, i'm talking about real damage, on par with espionage or sabotage, to our society. i think it's a bit overzealous to claim that is what happened here.
TK
Wisdom at Faux News? I think not.Originally Posted by Chris '68
One man's patriot is another man's traitor.
By the way, never trust anyone who uses the word "Democrat" as an adjective; i.e, "Democrat wars." The proper term is "Democratic." TG
Wisdom at Faux News? I think not.Originally Posted by Chris '68
One man's patriot is another man's traitor.
By the way, never trust anyone who uses the word "Democrat" as an adjective; i.e, "Democrat wars." The proper term is "Democratic." TG
Wisdom at Faux News? I think not.Originally Posted by Chris '68
One man's patriot is another man's traitor.
By the way, never trust anyone who uses the word "Democrat" as an adjective; i.e, "Democrat wars." The proper term is "Democratic." TG
Originally Posted by justmom
Bibi makes 3: A Jewish media conspiracy (with real Jews):
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pa...ubContrassID=0
Netanyahu and his supporters went on to complain about his treatment in the media. "I am honestly very worried by the poll results," said Likud MK Yuval Steinitz. He quickly went on the offensive, however, blaming the Israeli media and pollsters for "conspiring" to bury Netanyahu, a former prime minister who led Sharon in polls only a few months ago. Shai Bazak and Ofir Akonis, who are vying for places on the Likud?s Knesset list, said in interviews Wednesday that the media was discriminating against Netanyahu, and was widely reporting every failed step of Netanyahu?s campaign.
23 Kislev 5763 number of Ha'aretz
Netanyahu and supporters slam media, say will beat polls
By Yossi Verter, Ha'aretz Correspondent, and Ha'aretz Service
Originally Posted by justmom
Bibi makes 3: A Jewish media conspiracy (with real Jews):
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pa...ubContrassID=0
Netanyahu and his supporters went on to complain about his treatment in the media. "I am honestly very worried by the poll results," said Likud MK Yuval Steinitz. He quickly went on the offensive, however, blaming the Israeli media and pollsters for "conspiring" to bury Netanyahu, a former prime minister who led Sharon in polls only a few months ago. Shai Bazak and Ofir Akonis, who are vying for places on the Likud?s Knesset list, said in interviews Wednesday that the media was discriminating against Netanyahu, and was widely reporting every failed step of Netanyahu?s campaign.
23 Kislev 5763 number of Ha'aretz
Netanyahu and supporters slam media, say will beat polls
By Yossi Verter, Ha'aretz Correspondent, and Ha'aretz Service