Generational Dynamics
Fourth Turning Forum Archive


Popular links:
Generational Dynamics Web Site
Generational Dynamics Forum
Fourth Turning Archive home page
New Fourth Turning Forum

Thread: Evidence We're in a Third--or Fourth--Turning - Page 202







Post#5026 at 12-06-2002 05:34 PM by Opusaug [at Ft. Myers, Florida joined Sep 2001 #posts 7]
---
12-06-2002, 05:34 PM #5026
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Ft. Myers, Florida
Posts
7

Quote Originally Posted by TrollKing
Quote Originally Posted by Chris'68
....the two children I didn't let her abort don't think it's too bad.
didn't let her abort? i don't mean to pry, but did you really mean that? because it implies that that's what would have happened had you not stopped it.
You understood me perfectly the first time I said it, TK. I wasn't implying anything - I'm telling you flat-out.

"Well, since... <insert excuse here> ...I could just get an abortion...."

I heard this routine at least five times during each pregnancy. And just in case there are some out there who think I "misunderstood" or who think "she said 'could', not 'should' or 'will'...", this is the same woman who, a couple of years later and after I'd spent 6 months in exile following her change of the locks, told me to "come get the kids."

"But I'm not ready yet - I still don't have a place of my own and I'm staying in my parents' small house in Florida." (We're originally from NJ.)

"Come get them, or I'll get rid of them."

Susan Smith had killed her two children (in North Carolina?) the month before.

(me, irritated) "What are you going to do, strap them into a Jeep and roll them into a lake?"

"I just might."

I was on a plane and in NJ within 24 hrs.

I'll admit in retrospect that my judge of prospective mates was pitiful, but even if I could have foreseen these circumstances (or worse), I've never been fond of letting other people relieve me of the pleasures, pains and responsibilities of being a parent to those two "clumps of cells".

The great thing about S&H is that it brings into sharp focus that any discussion of history, sociology, economics, etc. isn't just an obscure philosophical conversation. The wheel of time turns, and we are all teeth on the gears.
Christopher O'Conor
13er, '68 cohort







Post#5027 at 12-06-2002 06:06 PM by TrollKing [at Portland, OR -- b. 1968 joined Sep 2001 #posts 1,257]
---
12-06-2002, 06:06 PM #5027
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Portland, OR -- b. 1968
Posts
1,257

Quote Originally Posted by Chris'68
(me, irritated) "What are you going to do, strap them into a Jeep and roll them into a lake?"

"I just might."
damn! that's crazy.

good for you, though, getting on that plane immediately.


TK







Post#5028 at 12-06-2002 06:06 PM by TrollKing [at Portland, OR -- b. 1968 joined Sep 2001 #posts 1,257]
---
12-06-2002, 06:06 PM #5028
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Portland, OR -- b. 1968
Posts
1,257

Quote Originally Posted by Chris'68
(me, irritated) "What are you going to do, strap them into a Jeep and roll them into a lake?"

"I just might."
damn! that's crazy.

good for you, though, getting on that plane immediately.


TK







Post#5029 at 12-06-2002 06:06 PM by TrollKing [at Portland, OR -- b. 1968 joined Sep 2001 #posts 1,257]
---
12-06-2002, 06:06 PM #5029
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Portland, OR -- b. 1968
Posts
1,257

Quote Originally Posted by Chris'68
(me, irritated) "What are you going to do, strap them into a Jeep and roll them into a lake?"

"I just might."
damn! that's crazy.

good for you, though, getting on that plane immediately.


TK







Post#5030 at 12-06-2002 06:12 PM by jds1958xg [at joined Jan 2002 #posts 1,002]
---
12-06-2002, 06:12 PM #5030
Join Date
Jan 2002
Posts
1,002

Quote Originally Posted by TrollKing

good for you, though, getting on that plane immediately.


TK
A-Men to that!!!!!







Post#5031 at 12-06-2002 06:12 PM by jds1958xg [at joined Jan 2002 #posts 1,002]
---
12-06-2002, 06:12 PM #5031
Join Date
Jan 2002
Posts
1,002

Quote Originally Posted by TrollKing

good for you, though, getting on that plane immediately.


TK
A-Men to that!!!!!







Post#5032 at 12-06-2002 06:12 PM by jds1958xg [at joined Jan 2002 #posts 1,002]
---
12-06-2002, 06:12 PM #5032
Join Date
Jan 2002
Posts
1,002

Quote Originally Posted by TrollKing

good for you, though, getting on that plane immediately.


TK
A-Men to that!!!!!







Post#5033 at 12-06-2002 06:22 PM by Brian Rush [at California joined Jul 2001 #posts 12,392]
---
12-06-2002, 06:22 PM #5033
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
California
Posts
12,392

Yeah, that almost makes up for the implications of not having "let" her get abortions (as if it was your decision).

So as a result, we have two entire generations (Boomers and Xers) who came of age having nothing special and intimate to offer their future soulmates that they hadn't already squandered
"Squandered" -- you mean there's a limited supply? We have to conserve and hoard our love, or we'll run out halfway through a relationship?

Balderdash.







Post#5034 at 12-06-2002 06:22 PM by Brian Rush [at California joined Jul 2001 #posts 12,392]
---
12-06-2002, 06:22 PM #5034
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
California
Posts
12,392

Yeah, that almost makes up for the implications of not having "let" her get abortions (as if it was your decision).

So as a result, we have two entire generations (Boomers and Xers) who came of age having nothing special and intimate to offer their future soulmates that they hadn't already squandered
"Squandered" -- you mean there's a limited supply? We have to conserve and hoard our love, or we'll run out halfway through a relationship?

Balderdash.







Post#5035 at 12-06-2002 06:22 PM by Brian Rush [at California joined Jul 2001 #posts 12,392]
---
12-06-2002, 06:22 PM #5035
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
California
Posts
12,392

Yeah, that almost makes up for the implications of not having "let" her get abortions (as if it was your decision).

So as a result, we have two entire generations (Boomers and Xers) who came of age having nothing special and intimate to offer their future soulmates that they hadn't already squandered
"Squandered" -- you mean there's a limited supply? We have to conserve and hoard our love, or we'll run out halfway through a relationship?

Balderdash.







Post#5036 at 12-06-2002 07:20 PM by jds1958xg [at joined Jan 2002 #posts 1,002]
---
12-06-2002, 07:20 PM #5036
Join Date
Jan 2002
Posts
1,002

No, it's a reference to the virginity that both generations were taught to devalue, and throw away at the first opportunity, instead of surrendering it only to that one special someone.







Post#5037 at 12-06-2002 07:20 PM by jds1958xg [at joined Jan 2002 #posts 1,002]
---
12-06-2002, 07:20 PM #5037
Join Date
Jan 2002
Posts
1,002

No, it's a reference to the virginity that both generations were taught to devalue, and throw away at the first opportunity, instead of surrendering it only to that one special someone.







Post#5038 at 12-06-2002 07:20 PM by jds1958xg [at joined Jan 2002 #posts 1,002]
---
12-06-2002, 07:20 PM #5038
Join Date
Jan 2002
Posts
1,002

No, it's a reference to the virginity that both generations were taught to devalue, and throw away at the first opportunity, instead of surrendering it only to that one special someone.







Post#5039 at 12-07-2002 12:28 AM by Opusaug [at Ft. Myers, Florida joined Sep 2001 #posts 7]
---
12-07-2002, 12:28 AM #5039
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Ft. Myers, Florida
Posts
7

Quote Originally Posted by Brian Rush
Yeah, that almost makes up for the implications of not having "let" her get abortions (as if it was your decision).
I find it so heartwarming to hear that you almost approve of my actions. And I'm so glad I finally learned The Truth - that my two little clumps of cells (now 12 and 10 years old) weigh nothing on The Rush Scale of Justice against my ex-wife's Constitutional right to murder. And that I (silly me!) don't even get the privilage of being weighed on that scale at all.

You have no clue what I might have done to make it my decision, sir. But were I to tell you, would you feel inclined to have me arrested for violating her civil rights? And to make amends for my villainy, perhaps we should impose the Exclusionary Rule, and excise the fruit of the poisoned tree?
Christopher O'Conor
13er, '68 cohort







Post#5040 at 12-07-2002 12:28 AM by Opusaug [at Ft. Myers, Florida joined Sep 2001 #posts 7]
---
12-07-2002, 12:28 AM #5040
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Ft. Myers, Florida
Posts
7

Quote Originally Posted by Brian Rush
Yeah, that almost makes up for the implications of not having "let" her get abortions (as if it was your decision).
I find it so heartwarming to hear that you almost approve of my actions. And I'm so glad I finally learned The Truth - that my two little clumps of cells (now 12 and 10 years old) weigh nothing on The Rush Scale of Justice against my ex-wife's Constitutional right to murder. And that I (silly me!) don't even get the privilage of being weighed on that scale at all.

You have no clue what I might have done to make it my decision, sir. But were I to tell you, would you feel inclined to have me arrested for violating her civil rights? And to make amends for my villainy, perhaps we should impose the Exclusionary Rule, and excise the fruit of the poisoned tree?
Christopher O'Conor
13er, '68 cohort







Post#5041 at 12-07-2002 12:28 AM by Opusaug [at Ft. Myers, Florida joined Sep 2001 #posts 7]
---
12-07-2002, 12:28 AM #5041
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Ft. Myers, Florida
Posts
7

Quote Originally Posted by Brian Rush
Yeah, that almost makes up for the implications of not having "let" her get abortions (as if it was your decision).
I find it so heartwarming to hear that you almost approve of my actions. And I'm so glad I finally learned The Truth - that my two little clumps of cells (now 12 and 10 years old) weigh nothing on The Rush Scale of Justice against my ex-wife's Constitutional right to murder. And that I (silly me!) don't even get the privilage of being weighed on that scale at all.

You have no clue what I might have done to make it my decision, sir. But were I to tell you, would you feel inclined to have me arrested for violating her civil rights? And to make amends for my villainy, perhaps we should impose the Exclusionary Rule, and excise the fruit of the poisoned tree?
Christopher O'Conor
13er, '68 cohort







Post#5042 at 12-07-2002 07:31 AM by Rain Man [at Bendigo, Australia joined Jun 2001 #posts 1,303]
---
12-07-2002, 07:31 AM #5042
Join Date
Jun 2001
Location
Bendigo, Australia
Posts
1,303

Quote Originally Posted by jds1958xg
No, it's a reference to the virginity that both generations were taught to devalue, and throw away at the first opportunity, instead of surrendering it only to that one special someone.
What the hell is so special about virginity?







Post#5043 at 12-07-2002 07:31 AM by Rain Man [at Bendigo, Australia joined Jun 2001 #posts 1,303]
---
12-07-2002, 07:31 AM #5043
Join Date
Jun 2001
Location
Bendigo, Australia
Posts
1,303

Quote Originally Posted by jds1958xg
No, it's a reference to the virginity that both generations were taught to devalue, and throw away at the first opportunity, instead of surrendering it only to that one special someone.
What the hell is so special about virginity?







Post#5044 at 12-07-2002 10:54 AM by Opusaug [at Ft. Myers, Florida joined Sep 2001 #posts 7]
---
12-07-2002, 10:54 AM #5044
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Ft. Myers, Florida
Posts
7

Quote Originally Posted by Tristan Jones
What the hell is so special about virginity?
Actually, the concept we're describing is chastity. "Virginity" is simply chastity before the first time.

Chastity is one of those lovely philosophical and theological concepts that separate us from the dogs, Mr. Jones. Some of us think it's a good thing to avoid plugging every female that strikes our fancy.

Quote Originally Posted by TrollKing
geez, kevin, you make it sound like there's nothing special or intimate to share with a lover besides one's body. even if that were true, it's not really something that one can "squander".
These two statements taken together are almost unfathomable.

TK, whatever you think "it" is that Kevin is talking about, if "it" were an endless resource, by definition "it" would not be special. "It" would then be common, and you could get it anywhere.
Christopher O'Conor
13er, '68 cohort







Post#5045 at 12-07-2002 10:54 AM by Opusaug [at Ft. Myers, Florida joined Sep 2001 #posts 7]
---
12-07-2002, 10:54 AM #5045
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Ft. Myers, Florida
Posts
7

Quote Originally Posted by Tristan Jones
What the hell is so special about virginity?
Actually, the concept we're describing is chastity. "Virginity" is simply chastity before the first time.

Chastity is one of those lovely philosophical and theological concepts that separate us from the dogs, Mr. Jones. Some of us think it's a good thing to avoid plugging every female that strikes our fancy.

Quote Originally Posted by TrollKing
geez, kevin, you make it sound like there's nothing special or intimate to share with a lover besides one's body. even if that were true, it's not really something that one can "squander".
These two statements taken together are almost unfathomable.

TK, whatever you think "it" is that Kevin is talking about, if "it" were an endless resource, by definition "it" would not be special. "It" would then be common, and you could get it anywhere.
Christopher O'Conor
13er, '68 cohort







Post#5046 at 12-07-2002 12:14 PM by Brian Rush [at California joined Jul 2001 #posts 12,392]
---
12-07-2002, 12:14 PM #5046
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
California
Posts
12,392

Chris:

You have no clue what I might have done to make it my decision, sir. But were I to tell you, would you feel inclined to have me arrested for violating her civil rights?
Without knowing what you did, how can I answer? But your choice of words earlier was quite interesting and revealing.

No, in my view it was her body, and whether your wishes counted at all was up to her. Saving the children later, once they were actual (not merely potential) human beings was another matter. Of which I do approve, of course.

And to make amends for my villainy, perhaps we should impose the Exclusionary Rule, and excise the fruit of the poisoned tree?
How about you make an effort to excise your silly paranoia, instead?

Needless to say (or it should be), the sins of the fathers should not be visited upon the children.

Regarding chastity, one should make a distinction between honoring a relationship with faithfulness (assuming that's expected, which it usually but not always is), and sex before the relationship even begins, or after it ends. There is indeed something that can be squandered while a relationship is going on, in fact several somethings: time, attention, trust, security.

No woman I've had sex with was a virgin the first time I did. My ex-wife had had so many lovers she lost count somewhere after 60 when I (with amazing folly) asked her that question early in our relationship. Did this hurt our relationship? Not in the least. (Although other things did, obviously.) In fact, I'm sure it, and my own less extensive but still substantial experience prior to our marriage, made our sex life better. (And it was fantastic; our problems all occurred out of bed. Sadly, that's where we spent most of our time together, and those problems outweighed the passion.)

But we were both entirely faithful within the marriage, except towards the end when the relationship was falling apart already for other reasons.

Some of us think it's a good thing to avoid plugging every female that strikes our fancy.
Many of us who agree, nonetheless think there are options between that extreme and its opposite.







Post#5047 at 12-07-2002 12:14 PM by Brian Rush [at California joined Jul 2001 #posts 12,392]
---
12-07-2002, 12:14 PM #5047
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
California
Posts
12,392

Chris:

You have no clue what I might have done to make it my decision, sir. But were I to tell you, would you feel inclined to have me arrested for violating her civil rights?
Without knowing what you did, how can I answer? But your choice of words earlier was quite interesting and revealing.

No, in my view it was her body, and whether your wishes counted at all was up to her. Saving the children later, once they were actual (not merely potential) human beings was another matter. Of which I do approve, of course.

And to make amends for my villainy, perhaps we should impose the Exclusionary Rule, and excise the fruit of the poisoned tree?
How about you make an effort to excise your silly paranoia, instead?

Needless to say (or it should be), the sins of the fathers should not be visited upon the children.

Regarding chastity, one should make a distinction between honoring a relationship with faithfulness (assuming that's expected, which it usually but not always is), and sex before the relationship even begins, or after it ends. There is indeed something that can be squandered while a relationship is going on, in fact several somethings: time, attention, trust, security.

No woman I've had sex with was a virgin the first time I did. My ex-wife had had so many lovers she lost count somewhere after 60 when I (with amazing folly) asked her that question early in our relationship. Did this hurt our relationship? Not in the least. (Although other things did, obviously.) In fact, I'm sure it, and my own less extensive but still substantial experience prior to our marriage, made our sex life better. (And it was fantastic; our problems all occurred out of bed. Sadly, that's where we spent most of our time together, and those problems outweighed the passion.)

But we were both entirely faithful within the marriage, except towards the end when the relationship was falling apart already for other reasons.

Some of us think it's a good thing to avoid plugging every female that strikes our fancy.
Many of us who agree, nonetheless think there are options between that extreme and its opposite.







Post#5048 at 12-07-2002 12:31 PM by Opusaug [at Ft. Myers, Florida joined Sep 2001 #posts 7]
---
12-07-2002, 12:31 PM #5048
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Ft. Myers, Florida
Posts
7

Quote Originally Posted by Brian Rush
How about you make an effort to excise your silly paranoia, instead?
Since I'm now simply silly with paranoia, am I excused from being tyrannical?

:lol:

Quote Originally Posted by Brian Rush
Needless to say (or it should be), the sins of the fathers should not be visited upon the children.
But what you seemingly fail to comprehend sir, is that without those "sins" there would be no children.

Now, then, we are forced to ask - is life in and of itself GOOD? Or is the absence of life sometimes better?
Christopher O'Conor
13er, '68 cohort







Post#5049 at 12-07-2002 12:31 PM by Opusaug [at Ft. Myers, Florida joined Sep 2001 #posts 7]
---
12-07-2002, 12:31 PM #5049
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Ft. Myers, Florida
Posts
7

Quote Originally Posted by Brian Rush
How about you make an effort to excise your silly paranoia, instead?
Since I'm now simply silly with paranoia, am I excused from being tyrannical?

:lol:

Quote Originally Posted by Brian Rush
Needless to say (or it should be), the sins of the fathers should not be visited upon the children.
But what you seemingly fail to comprehend sir, is that without those "sins" there would be no children.

Now, then, we are forced to ask - is life in and of itself GOOD? Or is the absence of life sometimes better?
Christopher O'Conor
13er, '68 cohort







Post#5050 at 12-07-2002 12:57 PM by jds1958xg [at joined Jan 2002 #posts 1,002]
---
12-07-2002, 12:57 PM #5050
Join Date
Jan 2002
Posts
1,002

Quote Originally Posted by Brian Rush
Needless to say (or it should be), the sins of the fathers should not be visited upon the children.

Note how the authoritarian left once more contradicts itself, if doing so suits the purpose. North Korea does it all the time! As did Albania, until their hard-line Stalinist regime fell. And China, during the Cultural Revolution. Not to mention the old Soviet Union (When he first applied for Communist Party membership, Gorbachev as almost turned down flat because his father had been sent to the gulag during one of Stalin's purges.).
-----------------------------------------