On 2002-03-06 19:39, Susan Brombacher wrote:
Suffering is another unbeautiful thing that paradoxically has its own inherent beauty. This does not mean I wish people to suffer or be in pain of any kind; I do not.
However, suffering contains a certain nobility and humility that connects all humanity and reminds us that we are not far removed from our mammalian origins. A person in great pain or defeat is a difficult sight to behold, for sure, but it's a reminder that we are less than God, and have a long way to go toward any semblance of perfection. There's a tragic sort of beauty at work here. Traditional Christianity (especially Catholicism), for all its shortcomings, recognizes the beauty in suffering--Jesus suffered horribly on the cross and throughout his life, and yet brought salvation and joy through his suffering. Sinners are cleansed through the blood of Christ. Mary's endless tears bring comfort and relief to those who seek her guidance and compassion.
This, of course, does not mean we should go around being martyrs, seeking punishment--or become devout Catholics! It does mean that we can look deeper into human suffering--whether physical, spiritual, or emotional--and listen to what it is telling us about ourselves.
Suffering in animals or small children and infants, however, I find no beauty in. Watching an animal or child in pain is just plain upsetting. They can learn nothing from it; they are completely at the mercy of a force they cannot understand or gain insight from. There is only beauty in suffering where there can be potential knowledge gleaned from it.
Do I make any sense?