Generational Dynamics
Fourth Turning Forum Archive


Popular links:
Generational Dynamics Web Site
Generational Dynamics Forum
Fourth Turning Archive home page
New Fourth Turning Forum

Thread: The Spiral of Violence - Page 51







Post#1251 at 08-29-2010 10:20 PM by TnT [at joined Feb 2005 #posts 2,005]
---
08-29-2010, 10:20 PM #1251
Join Date
Feb 2005
Posts
2,005

Quote Originally Posted by ziggyX65 View Post
Hopefully that means his 15 minutes are almost up...
Whose? Gods?
" ... a man of notoriously vicious and intemperate disposition."







Post#1252 at 08-29-2010 10:35 PM by Odin [at Moorhead, MN, USA joined Sep 2006 #posts 14,442]
---
08-29-2010, 10:35 PM #1252
Join Date
Sep 2006
Location
Moorhead, MN, USA
Posts
14,442

Quote Originally Posted by Debol1990 View Post
I think you guys give way to much credit to Beck and Palin.

They are religious people with a conservative platform. They use there fame to spout off as pundits. That's it!

They are not interested in subjugating you in some sort of fascist (which doesn't make sense, totalitarian governments in modern times suppress religion) state where there going to gas the Gay's and Black's.

I have seen his show a couple times, and I think he is legitimately sincere in what he says.
I suggest you read up on how hate radio incited the Rwandan Genocide.
To recommend thrift to the poor is both grotesque and insulting. It is like advising a man who is starving to eat less.

-Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man under Socialism







Post#1253 at 08-29-2010 10:58 PM by Wes84 [at joined Jun 2009 #posts 856]
---
08-29-2010, 10:58 PM #1253
Join Date
Jun 2009
Posts
856

Quote Originally Posted by Debol1990 View Post
I have seen his show a couple times, and I think he is legitimately sincere in what he says.
That's what actually bothers me about Beck. This guy may really believe in all of the crazy things he says.

However, I still think he's motivated a great deal by the almighty $.







Post#1254 at 08-29-2010 11:23 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-29-2010, 11:23 PM #1254
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

I think Palin is pretty cool. She seems like a nice, motherly seeming woman. I haven't really been following what she believes in, but I read "You Betcha" which has all her "funny" quotations. Actually, compared to George Bush's book of "funnies", she rarely makes huge mistakes. She probably doesn't believe in pacifism and is probably pro-death penalty, since she's a Republican, so I doubt I'd see eye to eye with her.







Post#1255 at 08-29-2010 11:27 PM by TnT [at joined Feb 2005 #posts 2,005]
---
08-29-2010, 11:27 PM #1255
Join Date
Feb 2005
Posts
2,005

Quote Originally Posted by Debol1990 View Post
I have seen his show a couple times, and I think he is legitimately sincere in what he says.
Debol,

I'd be interested in your perspective - you seem to be somewhat conservative, yet rational, as opposed to some on this forum.

What do you think that Beck's message is? Can you sum him up for me in several bullet points? What are the fundamental principles behind his philosophy?
" ... a man of notoriously vicious and intemperate disposition."







Post#1256 at 08-30-2010 08:56 AM by James50 [at Atlanta, GA US joined Feb 2010 #posts 3,605]
---
08-30-2010, 08:56 AM #1256
Join Date
Feb 2010
Location
Atlanta, GA US
Posts
3,605

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
I suggest you read up on how hate radio incited the Rwandan Genocide.
Even for you Odin, this is over the top. Have you heard Glenn Beck call his opponents "roaches"? Is the radio state controlled? Has he incited anyone to violence? The man gets up and asks people to get their own houses in order and that somehow is analogous to Rwanda?

I think you are the one who needs to read up on the Rwandan genocide.

James50
Last edited by James50; 08-30-2010 at 08:59 AM.
The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected. - G.K. Chesterton







Post#1257 at 08-30-2010 09:08 AM by wtrg8 [at NoVA joined Dec 2008 #posts 1,262]
---
08-30-2010, 09:08 AM #1257
Join Date
Dec 2008
Location
NoVA
Posts
1,262

'If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.' - Noam Chomsky

Agree to disagree and then thank your lucky stripes you still have that ability in the USA.
Last edited by wtrg8; 08-30-2010 at 09:11 AM.







Post#1258 at 08-30-2010 10:23 AM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 10:23 AM #1258
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

Quote Originally Posted by wtrg8 View Post
'If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.' - Noam Chomsky

Agree to disagree and then thank your lucky stripes you still have that ability in the USA.
I thought people in the US have (limited) freedom of speech, in free speech zones, but not freedom of expression.







Post#1259 at 08-30-2010 10:24 AM by ziggyX65 [at Texas Hill Country joined Apr 2010 #posts 2,634]
---
08-30-2010, 10:24 AM #1259
Join Date
Apr 2010
Location
Texas Hill Country
Posts
2,634

Quote Originally Posted by Adina View Post
I thought people in the US have (limited) freedom of speech, in free speech zones, but not freedom of expression.
The courts have generally interpreted "expression" to be a form of speech, subject to the same time-and-place restriction as actual speech (i.e. inciting a riot or revolution, "fire" in a crowded theater, et cetera).







Post#1260 at 08-30-2010 10:29 AM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 10:29 AM #1260
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

Anyway, whatever.







Post#1261 at 08-30-2010 11:55 AM by BookishXer [at joined Oct 2009 #posts 656]
---
08-30-2010, 11:55 AM #1261
Join Date
Oct 2009
Posts
656

Quote Originally Posted by wtrg8 View Post
'If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.' - Noam Chomsky

Agree to disagree and then thank your lucky stripes you still have that ability in the USA.

Yes, I agree. Beck, Palin and those on the other side of the political spectrum have the freedom to gather peacefully and speak what they believe.

Years ago, perhaps 15 or 20 years ago, a KKK demonstration was planned for a suburb in Illinois. This wasn’t the Skokie demonstration of the late ‘70s, but it roused controversy nonetheless.

I was in my early twenties at the time and thought the best way to handle the KKK and their rally was to fully ignore them. I thought, “no attention, no momentum.” I was then gently but effectively censured by a number of people, and I’m specifically remembering the words of a Jewish man much older than myself. Sometimes ignoring isn’t strong enough a response. Sometimes verbal or physical defiance is necessary. I was humbled.

Please know I’m not comparing Beck’s rally to a KKK meeting. I don’t believe it was an intentionally fascist-leaning attempt or that it was akin to a KKK or neo-Nazi rally.

However, I do believe we have the responsibility to discern what the message is. In this given situation, I was more concerned with the intent to elicit an emotional response from a large crowd through easily distorted terms such as “honor” and “restoration” than with Beck or Palin’s professional aspirations. We are an increasingly emotionally vulnerable population. Though not yet as desperate as some societies which have tumbled into vile forms of cruelty such a genocide, the more vulnerable we feel, the closer we can become to making emotionally-driven decisions.

Others might disagree with me, and I respect that, I do. But I still feel we have to be careful not to be manipulated. By either side.







Post#1262 at 08-30-2010 12:18 PM by Deb C [at joined Aug 2004 #posts 6,099]
---
08-30-2010, 12:18 PM #1262
Join Date
Aug 2004
Posts
6,099

Quote Originally Posted by BookishXer View Post
[
However, I do believe we have the responsibility to discern what the message is. In this given situation, I was more concerned with the intent to elicit an emotional response from a large crowd through easily distorted terms such as “honor” and “restoration” than with Beck or Palin’s professional aspirations. We are an increasingly emotionally vulnerable population. Though not yet as desperate as some societies which have tumbled into vile forms of cruelty such a genocide, the more vulnerable we feel, the closer we can become to making emotionally-driven decisions.

Others might disagree with me, and I respect that, I do. But I still feel we have to be careful not to be manipulated. By either side.
I fully agree. Looking beneath the surface, can be a sign of maturity. When actions and past attitudes don't match the words, then it is our responsibility to expose the discrepancy. Many a hen has been saved by not listening to the wooing of the fox.
"The only Good America is a Just America." .... pbrower2a







Post#1263 at 08-30-2010 12:32 PM by ziggyX65 [at Texas Hill Country joined Apr 2010 #posts 2,634]
---
08-30-2010, 12:32 PM #1263
Join Date
Apr 2010
Location
Texas Hill Country
Posts
2,634

Quote Originally Posted by TnT View Post
Whose? Gods?
No, Beck's.







Post#1264 at 08-30-2010 02:13 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 02:13 PM #1264
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

Quote Originally Posted by ziggyX65 View Post
The courts have generally interpreted "expression" to be a form of speech, subject to the same time-and-place restriction as actual speech (i.e. inciting a riot or revolution, "fire" in a crowded theater, et cetera).
Inciting a revolution?







Post#1265 at 08-30-2010 02:17 PM by ziggyX65 [at Texas Hill Country joined Apr 2010 #posts 2,634]
---
08-30-2010, 02:17 PM #1265
Join Date
Apr 2010
Location
Texas Hill Country
Posts
2,634

Quote Originally Posted by Adina View Post
Inciting a revolution?
Yes, if you encouraged your countrymen to rise up and bear arms against your government in an attempt to violently overthrow it, that is what you are doing. That is a form of speech or expression which is *not* protected.







Post#1266 at 08-30-2010 02:20 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 02:20 PM #1266
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

Quote Originally Posted by ziggyX65 View Post
Yes, if you encouraged your countrymen to rise up and bear arms against your government in an attempt to violently overthrow it, that is what you are doing. That is a form of speech or expression which is *not* protected.
So, like anarchists and people that "need" guns in case they have to overthrow the gov't if it ever became unjust.







Post#1267 at 08-30-2010 02:33 PM by ziggyX65 [at Texas Hill Country joined Apr 2010 #posts 2,634]
---
08-30-2010, 02:33 PM #1267
Join Date
Apr 2010
Location
Texas Hill Country
Posts
2,634

Quote Originally Posted by Adina View Post
...people that "need" guns in case they have to overthrow the gov't if it ever became unjust.
In reality, this is a significant reason why the Second Amendment was put in place. And many of the writings of the nation's founders specifically referred to an armed citizenry as a last defense against a despotic and tyrannical government.

Frankly as long as we can still change the government at the ballot box in reasonably fair elections, we're nowhere near that point despite what a few rabble-rousing "militia" types say. But the founders (and no, I'm not deifying them) did know enough about the history of governments tending to become more oppressive over time -- until the next revolution.

I assume as a pacifist in the extreme, you would always prefer to surrender the guns to the authorities no matter how oppressive they were?







Post#1268 at 08-30-2010 02:36 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 02:36 PM #1268
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

I think so.







Post#1269 at 08-30-2010 03:20 PM by wtrg8 [at NoVA joined Dec 2008 #posts 1,262]
---
08-30-2010, 03:20 PM #1269
Join Date
Dec 2008
Location
NoVA
Posts
1,262

Quote Originally Posted by BookishXer View Post
Yes, I agree. Beck, Palin and those on the other side of the political spectrum have the freedom to gather peacefully and speak what they believe.

Years ago, perhaps 15 or 20 years ago, a KKK demonstration was planned for a suburb in Illinois. This wasn’t the Skokie demonstration of the late ‘70s, but it roused controversy nonetheless.

I was in my early twenties at the time and thought the best way to handle the KKK and their rally was to fully ignore them. I thought, “no attention, no momentum.” I was then gently but effectively censured by a number of people, and I’m specifically remembering the words of a Jewish man much older than myself. Sometimes ignoring isn’t strong enough a response. Sometimes verbal or physical defiance is necessary. I was humbled.

Please know I’m not comparing Beck’s rally to a KKK meeting. I don’t believe it was an intentionally fascist-leaning attempt or that it was akin to a KKK or neo-Nazi rally.

However, I do believe we have the responsibility to discern what the message is. In this given situation, I was more concerned with the intent to elicit an emotional response from a large crowd through easily distorted terms such as “honor” and “restoration” than with Beck or Palin’s professional aspirations. We are an increasingly emotionally vulnerable population. Though not yet as desperate as some societies which have tumbled into vile forms of cruelty such a genocide, the more vulnerable we feel, the closer we can become to making emotionally-driven decisions.

Others might disagree with me, and I respect that, I do. But I still feel we have to be careful not to be manipulated. By either side.
Bill Hicks said it best, 'Think for yourself, question Authority'.







Post#1270 at 08-30-2010 03:34 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 03:34 PM #1270
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

Quote Originally Posted by wtrg8 View Post
Bill Hicks said it best, 'Think for yourself, question Authority'.
That phrase has become overused.







Post#1271 at 08-30-2010 03:38 PM by ziggyX65 [at Texas Hill Country joined Apr 2010 #posts 2,634]
---
08-30-2010, 03:38 PM #1271
Join Date
Apr 2010
Location
Texas Hill Country
Posts
2,634

Quote Originally Posted by Adina View Post
That phrase has become overused.
Any amount of using it is overuse to someone who prefers blind allegiance to authority.







Post#1272 at 08-30-2010 03:42 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 03:42 PM #1272
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

Quote Originally Posted by ziggyX65 View Post
Any amount of using it is overuse to someone who prefers blind allegiance to authority.
I don't believe in blind allegiance to anything. I just don't like to cause trouble.







Post#1273 at 08-30-2010 03:42 PM by Tone70 [at Omaha joined Apr 2010 #posts 1,473]
---
08-30-2010, 03:42 PM #1273
Join Date
Apr 2010
Location
Omaha
Posts
1,473

Quote Originally Posted by BookishXer View Post
Yes, I agree. Beck, Palin and those on the other side of the political spectrum have the freedom to gather peacefully and speak what they believe.

Years ago, perhaps 15 or 20 years ago, a KKK demonstration was planned for a suburb in Illinois. This wasn’t the Skokie demonstration of the late ‘70s, but it roused controversy nonetheless.

I was in my early twenties at the time and thought the best way to handle the KKK and their rally was to fully ignore them. I thought, “no attention, no momentum.” I was then gently but effectively censured by a number of people, and I’m specifically remembering the words of a Jewish man much older than myself. Sometimes ignoring isn’t strong enough a response. Sometimes verbal or physical defiance is necessary. I was humbled.

Please know I’m not comparing Beck’s rally to a KKK meeting. I don’t believe it was an intentionally fascist-leaning attempt or that it was akin to a KKK or neo-Nazi rally.

However, I do believe we have the responsibility to discern what the message is. In this given situation, I was more concerned with the intent to elicit an emotional response from a large crowd through easily distorted terms such as “honor” and “restoration” than with Beck or Palin’s professional aspirations. We are an increasingly emotionally vulnerable population. Though not yet as desperate as some societies which have tumbled into vile forms of cruelty such a genocide, the more vulnerable we feel, the closer we can become to making emotionally-driven decisions.

Others might disagree with me, and I respect that, I do. But I still feel we have to be careful not to be manipulated. By either side.
Well said!
"Freedom is not something that the rulers "give" the population...people have immense power potential. It is ultimately their attitudes, behavior, cooperation, and obedience that supply the power to all rulers and hierarchical systems..." - Gene Sharp

"The Occupy protesters are acting like citizens, believing they have the power to change things...that humble people can acquire power when they convince themselves they can." - William Greider







Post#1274 at 08-30-2010 03:55 PM by ziggyX65 [at Texas Hill Country joined Apr 2010 #posts 2,634]
---
08-30-2010, 03:55 PM #1274
Join Date
Apr 2010
Location
Texas Hill Country
Posts
2,634

Quote Originally Posted by Adina View Post
I don't believe in blind allegiance to anything. I just don't like to cause trouble.
Refusal to confront abuse of authority is, for all real-world purposes, the same as blind allegiance to it -- or at least, passive acceptance of anything they choose to do.







Post#1275 at 08-30-2010 03:57 PM by BookishXer [at joined Oct 2009 #posts 656]
---
08-30-2010, 03:57 PM #1275
Join Date
Oct 2009
Posts
656

Quote Originally Posted by Tone70 View Post
Well said!
Aww, Tone. You keep paying me compliments on my posts and I'll have to send you flowers. Or a gift card.
-----------------------------------------