Generational Dynamics
Fourth Turning Forum Archive


Popular links:
Generational Dynamics Web Site
Generational Dynamics Forum
Fourth Turning Archive home page
New Fourth Turning Forum

Thread: The Spiral of Violence - Page 52







Post#1276 at 08-30-2010 04:08 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 04:08 PM #1276
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

Quote Originally Posted by ziggyX65 View Post
Refusal to confront abuse of authority is, for all real-world purposes, the same as blind allegiance to it -- or at least, passive acceptance of anything they choose to do.
I don't know about that.







Post#1277 at 08-30-2010 04:23 PM by James50 [at Atlanta, GA US joined Feb 2010 #posts 3,605]
---
08-30-2010, 04:23 PM #1277
Join Date
Feb 2010
Location
Atlanta, GA US
Posts
3,605

Quote Originally Posted by BookishXer View Post
In this given situation, I was more concerned with the intent to elicit an emotional response from a large crowd through easily distorted terms such as “honor” and “restoration” than with Beck or Palin’s professional aspirations. We are an increasingly emotionally vulnerable population.
I can't help but remark that Obama used the same technique during the 2008 campaign with words like "hope" and "change". I certainly was moved by his use of them. Many people are now making fun of these words.

As you say, we are very vulnerable, but I think we will be pragmatic in the end. "Do I feel good?" feels like a hangover when "Is it working?" fails.

James50
The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected. - G.K. Chesterton







Post#1278 at 08-30-2010 04:34 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 04:34 PM #1278
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

I remember watching a speech made by Obama, and he did use those words. I can't even remember what the speech was about, and I only watched it for like 20 seconds because it was boring, but I do remember those words. Although I knew he would probably change what should stay the same, and keep the things that should be changed the same. So I never got sucked in by his rhetoric. Of course it seemed like most of his ideas were the opposite of mine.







Post#1279 at 08-30-2010 05:04 PM by Tone70 [at Omaha joined Apr 2010 #posts 1,473]
---
08-30-2010, 05:04 PM #1279
Join Date
Apr 2010
Location
Omaha
Posts
1,473

Quote Originally Posted by BookishXer View Post
Aww, Tone. You keep paying me compliments on my posts and I'll have to send you flowers. Or a gift card.
Smart people are cool.
"Freedom is not something that the rulers "give" the population...people have immense power potential. It is ultimately their attitudes, behavior, cooperation, and obedience that supply the power to all rulers and hierarchical systems..." - Gene Sharp

"The Occupy protesters are acting like citizens, believing they have the power to change things...that humble people can acquire power when they convince themselves they can." - William Greider







Post#1280 at 08-30-2010 05:25 PM by BookishXer [at joined Oct 2009 #posts 656]
---
08-30-2010, 05:25 PM #1280
Join Date
Oct 2009
Posts
656

Quote Originally Posted by James50 View Post
I can't help but remark that Obama used the same technique during the 2008 campaign with words like "hope" and "change". I certainly was moved by his use of them. Many people are now making fun of these words.

As you say, we are very vulnerable, but I think we will be pragmatic in the end. "Do I feel good?" feels like a hangover when "Is it working?" fails.

James50
I didn’t intend to sound partisan. You’re right, politicians and personalities of both sides have long used emotional appeal. Any sales pitch, it seems, requires an element of such.

Speaking momentarily only of the Beck rally, what struck me was the connotation. Participants were dressed in elaborate displays of red, white and blue. Beck, a divisive personality who has made a successful living being divisive, organized the rally. Sarah Palin, also a divisive personality who has increasingly promote her own divisive communication style, was one of the speakers. When people of this nature speak of things such as “restoring America” and “bringing honor back to America,” amidst a crowd of people dressed in grand displays of our national colors, it does give me pause. And when the crowd is equally ambiguous about what it is celebrating, deeper concerns are roused.

Are we to deduce that subscribing to what Beck and Palin believe is equal to true patriotism? James, I admit, I’m bothered by that.

To toss this to the other side, I feel similarly when someone such as Jesse Jackson speaks in hyperbole about an incident that might or might not be racially motivated. If I disagree, am I a racist?







Post#1281 at 08-30-2010 05:39 PM by James50 [at Atlanta, GA US joined Feb 2010 #posts 3,605]
---
08-30-2010, 05:39 PM #1281
Join Date
Feb 2010
Location
Atlanta, GA US
Posts
3,605

Quote Originally Posted by BookishXer View Post
I didn’t intend to sound partisan. You’re right, politicians and personalities of both sides have long used emotional appeal. Any sales pitch, it seems, requires an element of such.

Speaking momentarily only of the Beck rally, what struck me was the connotation. Participants were dressed in elaborate displays of red, white and blue. Beck, a divisive personality who has made a successful living being divisive, organized the rally. Sarah Palin, also a divisive personality who has increasingly promote her own divisive communication style, was one of the speakers. When people of this nature speak of things such as “restoring America” and “bringing honor back to America,” amidst a crowd of people dressed in grand displays of our national colors, it does give me pause. And when the crowd is equally ambiguous about what it is celebrating, deeper concerns are roused.

Are we to deduce that subscribing to what Beck and Palin believe is equal to true patriotism? James, I admit, I’m bothered by that.

To toss this to the other side, I feel similarly when someone such as Jesse Jackson speaks in hyperbole about an incident that might or might not be racially motivated. If I disagree, am I a racist?
Both Beck and Palin are divisive, and I agree that no one should be able to define one's own sense of patriotism. My takeaway from the event was not that Beck and Palin are about to take over. Rather, that the forces of hatred for the ruling class (however defined) in the US are gathering strength. The further down the national mood, the stronger this hatred gets. Our political class seems clueless and has created a vacuum for people like Palin and Beck. Whichever party can graft itself to the anger will win.

Sadly, I think it may be too late for Obama to ride that wave.

James50
Last edited by James50; 08-30-2010 at 07:46 PM.
The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected. - G.K. Chesterton







Post#1282 at 08-30-2010 05:42 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 05:42 PM #1282
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

If only Palin believed in the consistent life ethic, she would be a really good leader for this country.







Post#1283 at 08-30-2010 05:53 PM by Tone70 [at Omaha joined Apr 2010 #posts 1,473]
---
08-30-2010, 05:53 PM #1283
Join Date
Apr 2010
Location
Omaha
Posts
1,473

Quote Originally Posted by James50 View Post
Both Beck and Palin are divisive, and I agree that no one should be able to define one's own sense of patriotism. My takeaway from the event was not that Back and Palin are about to take over. Rather, that the forces of hatred for the ruling class (however defined) in the US are gathering strength. The further down the national mood, the stronger this hatred gets. Our political class seems clueless and have created a vacuum for people like Palin and Beck. Whichever party can graft itself to the anger will win.

Sadly, I think it may be too late for Obama to ride that wave.

James50
I'm starting to think he's going to get swamped by it in 2012.
"Freedom is not something that the rulers "give" the population...people have immense power potential. It is ultimately their attitudes, behavior, cooperation, and obedience that supply the power to all rulers and hierarchical systems..." - Gene Sharp

"The Occupy protesters are acting like citizens, believing they have the power to change things...that humble people can acquire power when they convince themselves they can." - William Greider







Post#1284 at 08-30-2010 08:03 PM by TnT [at joined Feb 2005 #posts 2,005]
---
08-30-2010, 08:03 PM #1284
Join Date
Feb 2005
Posts
2,005

Quote Originally Posted by Adina View Post
If only Palin believed in the consistent life ethic, she would be a really good leader for this country.
Adina, what in god's name are you talking about?
" ... a man of notoriously vicious and intemperate disposition."







Post#1285 at 08-30-2010 08:27 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 08:27 PM #1285
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

Quote Originally Posted by TnT View Post
Adina, what in god's name are you talking about?
I mean that if she was against the death penalty and stuff, then I think that she would be a great president, because she has some good ideas, and it would be cool if she symbolized the United States.







Post#1286 at 08-30-2010 10:14 PM by Wes84 [at joined Jun 2009 #posts 856]
---
08-30-2010, 10:14 PM #1286
Join Date
Jun 2009
Posts
856

Quote Originally Posted by Adina View Post
I mean that if she was against the death penalty and stuff, then I think that she would be a great president, because she has some good ideas, and it would be cool if she symbolized the United States.
Adina, what do you think are her good ideas?







Post#1287 at 08-30-2010 10:30 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 10:30 PM #1287
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

Quote Originally Posted by Wes84 View Post
Adina, what do you think are her good ideas?
Like being opposed to abortion and stuff. So she has good values. And she's a down to earth, real person. She's also nice, and rarely makes huge gaffs, like GWB.
Last edited by Adina; 08-30-2010 at 10:37 PM.







Post#1288 at 08-30-2010 10:47 PM by Tone70 [at Omaha joined Apr 2010 #posts 1,473]
---
08-30-2010, 10:47 PM #1288
Join Date
Apr 2010
Location
Omaha
Posts
1,473

Quote Originally Posted by Adina View Post
Like being opposed to abortion and stuff. So she has good values. And she's a down to earth, real person. She's also nice, and rarely makes huge gaffs, like GWB.
I'm afraid, dear, that she is not being truthful about her beliefs. She is an extremely calculating individual. Like most of this type she ends up believing her own lies. It can be hard to spot until you've seen it a few times.
"Freedom is not something that the rulers "give" the population...people have immense power potential. It is ultimately their attitudes, behavior, cooperation, and obedience that supply the power to all rulers and hierarchical systems..." - Gene Sharp

"The Occupy protesters are acting like citizens, believing they have the power to change things...that humble people can acquire power when they convince themselves they can." - William Greider







Post#1289 at 08-30-2010 11:01 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 11:01 PM #1289
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

Quote Originally Posted by Tone70 View Post
I'm afraid, dear, that she is not being truthful about her beliefs. She is an extremely calculating individual. Like most of this type she ends up believing her own lies. It can be hard to spot until you've seen it a few times.
What is she lying about? What does she really believe?







Post#1290 at 08-30-2010 11:44 PM by Tone70 [at Omaha joined Apr 2010 #posts 1,473]
---
08-30-2010, 11:44 PM #1290
Join Date
Apr 2010
Location
Omaha
Posts
1,473

Quote Originally Posted by Adina View Post
What is she lying about? What does she really believe?
The one thing I can say that she believes with surety is that money is good and more money is better. Other then that I have discerned no consistent themes other then the general you should listen to and vote for me because I'm just like you. Whoever you are.

Someone who is more interested in her might be able to detail a position for her. But I really don't think she has any permanent ones. Merely reactive statements designed to make an impact. In a way it's brilliant. If you have no consistent positions you can be everything to any person you're talking to. Particularly if those persons are not particularly looking to prove you wrong. After all why would they? They know you're one of them and darn folksy likable too. You betcha!
Last edited by Tone70; 08-31-2010 at 12:53 AM.
"Freedom is not something that the rulers "give" the population...people have immense power potential. It is ultimately their attitudes, behavior, cooperation, and obedience that supply the power to all rulers and hierarchical systems..." - Gene Sharp

"The Occupy protesters are acting like citizens, believing they have the power to change things...that humble people can acquire power when they convince themselves they can." - William Greider







Post#1291 at 08-30-2010 11:49 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-30-2010, 11:49 PM #1291
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

Well, she did say that she wanted to protect the middle class from being hurt by the government, which is good. And she is a Christian, so at least you know she has good morals for the most part. I just have a good feeling about her. And it's always important to listen to ones feelings.







Post#1292 at 08-31-2010 03:01 AM by Copperfield [at joined Feb 2010 #posts 2,244]
---
08-31-2010, 03:01 AM #1292
Join Date
Feb 2010
Posts
2,244

Quote Originally Posted by James50 View Post
Both Beck and Palin are divisive, and I agree that no one should be able to define one's own sense of patriotism. My takeaway from the event was not that Beck and Palin are about to take over. Rather, that the forces of hatred for the ruling class (however defined) in the US are gathering strength. The further down the national mood, the stronger this hatred gets. Our political class seems clueless and has created a vacuum for people like Palin and Beck. Whichever party can graft itself to the anger will win.

Sadly, I think it may be too late for Obama to ride that wave.

James50
Beck and Palin are not divisive. Rather they serve the opposite purpose. Beck and Palin seek to keep upset and rebellious conservatives in the Republican fold. The media and political system have no room for uncontrolled off-shoot groups or parties in the narrative. Beck and Palin simply serve as cowboys to corral the wandering herd and keep them voting for one of the two officially sanctioned teams. Democrats have had these sorts of figureheads for years (though they manifest as different sorts of characters). Republicans have only recently needed them.

Beck and Palin are idiots but idiots are often useful. As the Japanese proverb says: The nail that sticks up must be pounded down.
Last edited by Copperfield; 08-31-2010 at 03:04 AM.







Post#1293 at 08-31-2010 04:02 AM by Debol1990 [at joined Jul 2010 #posts 734]
---
08-31-2010, 04:02 AM #1293
Join Date
Jul 2010
Posts
734

Quote Originally Posted by TnT View Post
Debol,

I'd be interested in your perspective - you seem to be somewhat conservative, yet rational, as opposed to some on this forum.

What do you think that Beck's message is? Can you sum him up for me in several bullet points? What are the fundamental principles behind his philosophy?

I guess you could consider me pretty conservative, but not in the current "definition".

I don't fit into current party politics at all, and I find more and more Millies like me the older I get.

* End the Wars, and Oversea bases, focus on "defense"
*Abortion: Should be legal, at a point it gets iffy for me, once the child is viable outside the womb you run into problems.
*Gay Marriage, end Govt. sponsored benefits to Marriage, why is there even benefits to it? it is a private matter!
*I think the NEO-con world approach is wrong, And the way they have turned local police forces into law enforcement agencies (important difference) is disgusting
*with the above point : Patriot act, Military Commissions act and Gitmo need to go...now!
* All welfare programs need some serious work, I don't think they are necessarily bad but they don't appear to work well at all, housing projects, food stamps etc. They seem to feed the cycle of poverty more then lift people out of it.
*Government Agencies need to be cut if they are useless or infective. (why is there the NSA, DHS, FBI, and CIA cant the redundancy be fixed?)
*Overall I would prefer a strict adherence to the constitution on the Federal level, with more state power.
* I am not a fan of globalization and it has not helped our economy for the long haul. Who was that guy who warned of that sucking sound? He was surprisingly right!
*Race relations I find to be a zombie issue, something that should be dead and buried but wont die! This is something I'm going to have to wait out, until boomers and early Xer's are moving out of power.
* I am not religious, but I think the rabid attacks on crosses marking roadside memorials, and nativity scenes at schools is ridiculous. It is actually authoritarian, and if someone has a big problem with it, Im sure the school/courthouse would allow anyone to support their holidays with a display.
*Legalize Pot, it is not dangerous, I dont even smoke it! 80% of prisoners are for non-violent drug crimes, and more people are imprisoned here then in china...something is wrong!
*Stop wars on intangible ideas War on Crime, War on Drugs, War on Poverty, War on Terror. Every one of these has failed miserably. (not really important but...just stop!)

My stance on a lot of welfare programs is hard to place, mostly I find myself cynical. In the words of George Carlin "they dont give a f**k about you". He is right, they (meaning the gov-ment) does not care about you. If that is true welfare programs are not meant to help, but to coerce, and considering the track record of the War on Poverty, and the War on Drugs, they don't help. If you want to help people elevate to the middle class, I think it is better to support a charity (or volunteer like i do!) rather than force others to pay up because you feel like they should do something. I find that notion wrong, selfish, and immature.

Glen Beck is libertarian (economically) but with socially conservative views because he is religious. As you can see with my points above, I can sometimes agree with him....but a lot of times I can't! I think some on the left don't like him mostly cause he is religious and they find it threatening (I couldn't tell you why). He is also Mormon, and a lot of people do not like Mormon's. In Arizona their are many, and they are very very nice people, yet I have had to correct people because they believe falsehoods about the Mormon faith.

Many people get uncomfortable when he shows the founding fathers in a religious light. Which is stupid, because they are placing modern values on 1770's British citizens.

The founding fathers were religious it is not a problem (Jefferson was Deist probably because he was Jewish and couldn't practice it and maintain his place in the aristocracy), they used there belief in a higher power to assert inalienable rights. The point of all the god talk is to say "no mortal can ever take these away" because they are given to you by something more then any human could be. We forget that people perceived the king as a step below God, so the rights had to come from above the King. If you remove the idea of a higher power you then open the idea that rights are given by man, and thus, can be taken away by man.

Now, I don't believe in god...I dont think, Im still young and deciding, but im certainly not a religious person, and at most I think of religious texts as stories to have people lead good lives. (and guidelines on how not to die from pork!)

Glen Beck and Sarah Palin let the religion play too much into their platform for the mainstream. It really doesn't matter though because neither will run for office, the are more effective as punching bags, and rainmakers for republican candidates. The democratic party would be wise to stop focusing on these two, because they are only meant to draw the fire!







Post#1294 at 08-31-2010 06:02 AM by JustPassingThrough [at joined Dec 2006 #posts 5,196]
---
08-31-2010, 06:02 AM #1294
Join Date
Dec 2006
Posts
5,196

Quote Originally Posted by Debol1990 View Post
I guess you could consider me pretty conservative, but not in the current "definition".
Pretty much everything you said falls within the realm of libertarianism. I would say that describes your views pretty well.







Post#1295 at 08-31-2010 06:43 AM by Chas'88 [at In between Pennsylvania & Pennsyltucky joined Nov 2008 #posts 9,432]
---
08-31-2010, 06:43 AM #1295
Join Date
Nov 2008
Location
In between Pennsylvania & Pennsyltucky
Posts
9,432

Quote Originally Posted by Debol1990 View Post
I guess you could consider me pretty conservative, but not in the current "definition".

I don't fit into current party politics at all, and I find more and more Millies like me the older I get.

* End the Wars, and Oversea bases, focus on "defense"
*Abortion: Should be legal, at a point it gets iffy for me, once the child is viable outside the womb you run into problems.
*Gay Marriage, end Govt. sponsored benefits to Marriage, why is there even benefits to it? it is a private matter!
*I think the NEO-con world approach is wrong, And the way they have turned local police forces into law enforcement agencies (important difference) is disgusting
*with the above point : Patriot act, Military Commissions act and Gitmo need to go...now!
* All welfare programs need some serious work, I don't think they are necessarily bad but they don't appear to work well at all, housing projects, food stamps etc. They seem to feed the cycle of poverty more then lift people out of it.
*Government Agencies need to be cut if they are useless or infective. (why is there the NSA, DHS, FBI, and CIA cant the redundancy be fixed?)
*Overall I would prefer a strict adherence to the constitution on the Federal level, with more state power.
* I am not a fan of globalization and it has not helped our economy for the long haul. Who was that guy who warned of that sucking sound? He was surprisingly right!
*Race relations I find to be a zombie issue, something that should be dead and buried but wont die! This is something I'm going to have to wait out, until boomers and early Xer's are moving out of power.
* I am not religious, but I think the rabid attacks on crosses marking roadside memorials, and nativity scenes at schools is ridiculous. It is actually authoritarian, and if someone has a big problem with it, Im sure the school/courthouse would allow anyone to support their holidays with a display.
*Legalize Pot, it is not dangerous, I dont even smoke it! 80% of prisoners are for non-violent drug crimes, and more people are imprisoned here then in china...something is wrong!
*Stop wars on intangible ideas War on Crime, War on Drugs, War on Poverty, War on Terror. Every one of these has failed miserably. (not really important but...just stop!)

My stance on a lot of welfare programs is hard to place, mostly I find myself cynical. In the words of George Carlin "they dont give a f**k about you". He is right, they (meaning the gov-ment) does not care about you. If that is true welfare programs are not meant to help, but to coerce, and considering the track record of the War on Poverty, and the War on Drugs, they don't help. If you want to help people elevate to the middle class, I think it is better to support a charity (or volunteer like i do!) rather than force others to pay up because you feel like they should do something. I find that notion wrong, selfish, and immature.

Glen Beck is libertarian (economically) but with socially conservative views because he is religious. As you can see with my points above, I can sometimes agree with him....but a lot of times I can't! I think some on the left don't like him mostly cause he is religious and they find it threatening (I couldn't tell you why). He is also Mormon, and a lot of people do not like Mormon's. In Arizona their are many, and they are very very nice people, yet I have had to correct people because they believe falsehoods about the Mormon faith.

Many people get uncomfortable when he shows the founding fathers in a religious light. Which is stupid, because they are placing modern values on 1770's British citizens.

The founding fathers were religious it is not a problem (Jefferson was Deist probably because he was Jewish and couldn't practice it and maintain his place in the aristocracy), they used there belief in a higher power to assert inalienable rights. The point of all the god talk is to say "no mortal can ever take these away" because they are given to you by something more then any human could be. We forget that people perceived the king as a step below God, so the rights had to come from above the King. If you remove the idea of a higher power you then open the idea that rights are given by man, and thus, can be taken away by man.

Now, I don't believe in god...I dont think, Im still young and deciding, but im certainly not a religious person, and at most I think of religious texts as stories to have people lead good lives. (and guidelines on how not to die from pork!)

Glen Beck and Sarah Palin let the religion play too much into their platform for the mainstream. It really doesn't matter though because neither will run for office, the are more effective as punching bags, and rainmakers for republican candidates. The democratic party would be wise to stop focusing on these two, because they are only meant to draw the fire!
Your flippant remark of Jefferson made me do some individual research:

http://articles.sfgate.com/2007-02-2...-sally-hemings

&

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/475/w...-jewish-genes/

And for the record, I agree with the majority of the points you make in your post.

~Chas'88
Last edited by Chas'88; 08-31-2010 at 06:48 AM. Reason: added a link
"There have always been people who say: "The war will be over someday." I say there's no guarantee the war will ever be over. Naturally a brief intermission is conceivable. Maybe the war needs a breather, a war can even break its neck, so to speak. But the kings and emperors, not to mention the pope, will always come to its help in adversity. ON the whole, I'd say this war has very little to worry about, it'll live to a ripe old age."







Post#1296 at 08-31-2010 09:24 AM by The Grey Badger [at Albuquerque, NM joined Sep 2001 #posts 8,876]
---
08-31-2010, 09:24 AM #1296
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Posts
8,876

Quote Originally Posted by BookishXer View Post
If so, it's not surprising. "Honor" is a very positive word that carries very positive connotations. Generally, people want to posess honor (and receive honor.) It's a term that can be used to manipulate a group of people who are otherwise feeling vulnerable, disenfranchised and undervalued.
Many people define "honor" as "face" and "face" as something lost if anyone is allowed to show you disrespect.

"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor and let your reputation fall where it will." Aral Vorkosigan.







Post#1297 at 08-31-2010 01:45 PM by Bob Butler 54 [at Cove Hold, Carver, MA joined Jul 2001 #posts 6,431]
---
08-31-2010, 01:45 PM #1297
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
Cove Hold, Carver, MA
Posts
6,431

Left Arrow Values...

Quote Originally Posted by The Grey Badger View Post
Many people define "honor" as "face" and "face" as something lost if anyone is allowed to show you disrespect.

"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor and let your reputation fall where it will." Aral Vorkosigan.
Oh, what do those neo-barbarians know?







Post#1298 at 08-31-2010 01:48 PM by Adina [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 3,613]
---
08-31-2010, 01:48 PM #1298
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
3,613

Quote Originally Posted by Bob Butler 54 View Post
Oh, what do those neo-barbarians know?
How do you define them?







Post#1299 at 08-31-2010 02:33 PM by Debol1990 [at joined Jul 2010 #posts 734]
---
08-31-2010, 02:33 PM #1299
Join Date
Jul 2010
Posts
734

Quote Originally Posted by JustPassingThrough View Post
Pretty much everything you said falls within the realm of libertarianism. I would say that describes your views pretty well.

Yes, I do rely on libertarian thought a lot because the other two political parties have a tyrannical approach to everything!

My bias mostly stems from the mid 2000's

I guess as a Kid and watching disaster movies of the mid 90's I assumed no matter what crazy event happened, there would be someone their to help you.

Katrina basically ruined that for me, which is why I hold it as the catalyst. When we can get water too Pakistani's in a matter of hours, but can't get it to the Super-dome in 5 days, their is a fundamental problem in our system.

Combined with Katrina, was the obvious reality that the government had sent us to war with no reason and no plan. THey bungled the entire process and let Bin Laden slip away. Rumsfeld telling the troops they just have to deal with no body Armour? disgusting! I could understand if it were WWII and they couldn't make it fast enough, but Rumsfeld wanted to prove a point.

The only time they appeared to be competent was hiding their own bullshit, like the WMD debacle. Or secret prisons across the globe.

I live in AZ so Tillman was a big deal here, but after all of the shit during that time, the one thing the government did well, was drum up a fake story about a man who died in vain, so they could get fake support for a bullshit war! And the Tillman story went straight to the top! The worst part was, nobody cared that he died of friendly fire in the end, It was war, shit happens, it was the cover-up. They used the legacy of a good man to reach their own terrible goal; that about did me in.

And nothing that has happened in the last 5 years makes me believe things are better, I actually think they are worse, and a Katrina sized disaster would have us even less prepared. I don't ask for the government to improve anymore, because I don't think they can, unless the system falls a part and we can get some new people in DC.







Post#1300 at 08-31-2010 04:26 PM by TnT [at joined Feb 2005 #posts 2,005]
---
08-31-2010, 04:26 PM #1300
Join Date
Feb 2005
Posts
2,005

Quote Originally Posted by Debol1990 View Post
I guess you could consider me pretty conservative, but not in the current "definition".

I don't fit into current party politics at all, and I find more and more Millies like me the older I get.

* End the Wars, and Oversea bases, focus on "defense"
*Abortion: Should be legal, at a point it gets iffy for me, once the child is viable outside the womb you run into problems.
*Gay Marriage, end Govt. sponsored benefits to Marriage, why is there even benefits to it? it is a private matter!
*I think the NEO-con world approach is wrong, And the way they have turned local police forces into law enforcement agencies (important difference) is disgusting
*with the above point : Patriot act, Military Commissions act and Gitmo need to go...now!
* All welfare programs need some serious work, I don't think they are necessarily bad but they don't appear to work well at all, housing projects, food stamps etc. They seem to feed the cycle of poverty more then lift people out of it.
*Government Agencies need to be cut if they are useless or infective. (why is there the NSA, DHS, FBI, and CIA cant the redundancy be fixed?)
*Overall I would prefer a strict adherence to the constitution on the Federal level, with more state power.
* I am not a fan of globalization and it has not helped our economy for the long haul. Who was that guy who warned of that sucking sound? He was surprisingly right!
*Race relations I find to be a zombie issue, something that should be dead and buried but wont die! This is something I'm going to have to wait out, until boomers and early Xer's are moving out of power.
* I am not religious, but I think the rabid attacks on crosses marking roadside memorials, and nativity scenes at schools is ridiculous. It is actually authoritarian, and if someone has a big problem with it, Im sure the school/courthouse would allow anyone to support their holidays with a display.
*Legalize Pot, it is not dangerous, I dont even smoke it! 80% of prisoners are for non-violent drug crimes, and more people are imprisoned here then in china...something is wrong!
*Stop wars on intangible ideas War on Crime, War on Drugs, War on Poverty, War on Terror. Every one of these has failed miserably. (not really important but...just stop!)

My stance on a lot of welfare programs is hard to place, mostly I find myself cynical. In the words of George Carlin "they dont give a f**k about you". He is right, they (meaning the gov-ment) does not care about you. If that is true welfare programs are not meant to help, but to coerce, and considering the track record of the War on Poverty, and the War on Drugs, they don't help. If you want to help people elevate to the middle class, I think it is better to support a charity (or volunteer like i do!) rather than force others to pay up because you feel like they should do something. I find that notion wrong, selfish, and immature.

Glen Beck is libertarian (economically) but with socially conservative views because he is religious. As you can see with my points above, I can sometimes agree with him....but a lot of times I can't! I think some on the left don't like him mostly cause he is religious and they find it threatening (I couldn't tell you why). He is also Mormon, and a lot of people do not like Mormon's. In Arizona their are many, and they are very very nice people, yet I have had to correct people because they believe falsehoods about the Mormon faith.

Many people get uncomfortable when he shows the founding fathers in a religious light. Which is stupid, because they are placing modern values on 1770's British citizens.

The founding fathers were religious it is not a problem (Jefferson was Deist probably because he was Jewish and couldn't practice it and maintain his place in the aristocracy), they used there belief in a higher power to assert inalienable rights. The point of all the god talk is to say "no mortal can ever take these away" because they are given to you by something more then any human could be. We forget that people perceived the king as a step below God, so the rights had to come from above the King. If you remove the idea of a higher power you then open the idea that rights are given by man, and thus, can be taken away by man.

Now, I don't believe in god...I dont think, Im still young and deciding, but im certainly not a religious person, and at most I think of religious texts as stories to have people lead good lives. (and guidelines on how not to die from pork!)

Glen Beck and Sarah Palin let the religion play too much into their platform for the mainstream. It really doesn't matter though because neither will run for office, the are more effective as punching bags, and rainmakers for republican candidates. The democratic party would be wise to stop focusing on these two, because they are only meant to draw the fire!
Thanks! I enjoyed reading your analysis of your own philosophy. Interestingly, though I think of myself as a "flaming liberal with a room-full of guns," I find congenial many of your views. As a native Rocky Mountain westerner, my form of "liberalism" may lean to the individual liberty sort. I'm definitely one who wants to be simply left alone if I'm not bothering anyone else.

For myself, I can't listen to Beck for more than a few minutes, and I find Palin to be willfully ignorant. The anti-intellectual aspect that I see from many of the self-styled conservatives bothers me. That's one reason I like this site - "our" conservatives can hold up a train of thought and make one examine more closely one's own beliefs.
" ... a man of notoriously vicious and intemperate disposition."
-----------------------------------------