Generational Dynamics
Fourth Turning Forum Archive


Popular links:
Generational Dynamics Web Site
Generational Dynamics Forum
Fourth Turning Archive home page
New Fourth Turning Forum

Thread: The Spiral of Violence - Page 129







Post#3201 at 12-24-2012 08:04 AM by Kepi [at Northern, VA joined Nov 2012 #posts 3,664]
---
12-24-2012, 08:04 AM #3201
Join Date
Nov 2012
Location
Northern, VA
Posts
3,664

The Daily Mail and... Funtrivia.com... That's who you're going to cling to for your confirmation bias? Really? I can't say I'm surprised, but really? You know we have people whose job it is to study these things, right? That they have other tools than just the uniformed report? They have self report studies and victim report studies, and they even have ways of analyzing them to wind up with a fairly reasonable estimation on what the true crime rate is. And that goes for everywhere. And we have people who study the differences between laws and they can interpret and coorelate the statistics appropriately and yeild a fairly solid analysis. There's an entire field of people who study crime and study it cross culturally and they don't write for the daily mail or funtrivia.

These aren't "military weapons". Our military would never use a rifle that didn't have selective fire. Because, you know, it's 2012. But beyond that, a lot of sniper rifles are bolt actions. Are bolt actions now "military weapons"? Create a definition of "military weapons" that doesn't include taking a weapon out of the hands of a hunter. Good luck on that.

And also, nobody is promoting mass murder. Screaming angry, baseless, self-righteous rhetoric may have gotten you somewhere in the 2T, but here in the 4T the only people who do that are infants and crazy people. Mass murder is mass murder. Gun ownership is gun ownership. Trying to say they are one and the same is childish.

It's not "libertarian nonsense" it's knowing when what you're trying to do is unrealistic and counterproductive. See grown-ups understand when something is unrealistic, and that while nothing is impossible per se, that many things are just not practical. Trying to regulate trade in a global economy on previously legal and widely popular items owned by greater than 1/4 of your population is childish and unrealistic.

Most people who own firearms own semi-automatics. Magazine capacity varies, but it doesn't take much to switchout magazines. It really doesn't matter if you've got 6 10 round magazines, 3 20s 2 30's or 1 60 (except the 60'll look stupid and get you laughed at). It really doesn't matter if it's semi-auto or bolt action, because it doesn't take that much to learn to fire a bolt really fast. Again, doing so will make you look stupid, but it is what it is.

You know how many times I've seen a person open carry in my life? 1 time. 31 years I've lived in this state, from one end to the other, and I've been to just about every county therein and I've seen 1 person open carry once. He gained some weight and his gun chaffed, so he open carried one time. It was pretty funny. But open carry isn't a normal thing to see around here, regardless of legality.

Making things harder to buy is infringement. It wouldn't fly under the 2nd ammendment, and it doesn't matter much if you like it or not, it is the law. And, if a nutjob has it in his head he's going to get a gun, he'll get one. He'll score a job with private security or the police or the military and he'll get one and spree shoot just as easily. Or he'll turn around and buy several hundred pounds of common household cleaner unregulated and make explosives in his bathtub and go around bombing stuff. You wanna ban Bleach? Either way, it won't stop nutjobs.







Post#3202 at 12-24-2012 10:32 AM by Galen [at joined Aug 2010 #posts 1,017]
---
12-24-2012, 10:32 AM #3202
Join Date
Aug 2010
Posts
1,017

Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Green View Post
As usual, Galen is to be ignored, and Deb to be congratulated. The facts about Columbine, Ft. Hood and Virginia Tech are duly noted.
Eric the Obtuse still doesn't understand that not everyone shares his world view and will not comply with his edicts, or the government's for that matter.
If one rejects laissez faire on account of mans fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action.
- Ludwig von Mises

Beware of altruism. It is based on self-deception, the root of all evil.
- Lazarus Long







Post#3203 at 12-24-2012 01:39 PM by JDG 66 [at joined Aug 2010 #posts 2,106]
---
12-24-2012, 01:39 PM #3203
Join Date
Aug 2010
Posts
2,106

Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Green View Post
In the statistics I reported earlier here, England had 0.06 firearm homicides per 100,000 people, and 6.2 firearms owned per 100 people. The USA had 2.97 homicides per 100,000, and a rate of ownership of 88.8 per 100 people...
-A common flaw in gun controllers' reasoning when they compare society x today with the USA today. Britain had a lower murder rate before they instituted gun control in the 1920s and 1930s.
Quote Originally Posted by Deb C View Post
1) None of those places had armed guards inspecting each perosn with a metal detector.

2) The three places you named were perfect examples of gun control in action, where teh only guy in the building was the killer.







Post#3204 at 12-24-2012 01:59 PM by The Wonkette [at Arlington, VA 1956 joined Jul 2002 #posts 9,209]
---
12-24-2012, 01:59 PM #3204
Join Date
Jul 2002
Location
Arlington, VA 1956
Posts
9,209

Quote Originally Posted by JDG 66 View Post
-A common flaw in gun controllers' reasoning when they compare society x today with the USA today. Britain had a lower murder rate before they instituted gun control in the 1920s and 1930s.


1) None of those places had armed guards inspecting each perosn with a metal detector.

2) The three places you named were perfect examples of gun control in action, where teh only guy in the building was the killer.
Are you seriously suggestion that every school have metal detectors and armed guards? How do you propose funding such a measure?
I want people to know that peace is possible even in this stupid day and age. Prem Rawat, June 8, 2008







Post#3205 at 12-24-2012 02:02 PM by XYMOX_4AD_84 [at joined Nov 2012 #posts 3,073]
---
12-24-2012, 02:02 PM #3205
Join Date
Nov 2012
Posts
3,073

Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
There is one other factor that people like Eric the Obtuse is overlooking is that as 3D printing and CNC machine tools get cheaper the barriers to manufacturing firearms by individuals will be eliminated.
^ This.

On another thread I noted my expectation that by 2300 there would be personal WMD. That was not meant to be a far fetched forecast. I really believe it. Probably much sooner - by 2050.







Post#3206 at 12-24-2012 03:43 PM by Kepi [at Northern, VA joined Nov 2012 #posts 3,664]
---
12-24-2012, 03:43 PM #3206
Join Date
Nov 2012
Location
Northern, VA
Posts
3,664

You are a condescending, ignorant manchild. There's no way to have an intelligent conversation with you, is there? You can't even be dragged kicking and screaming into a reasonable or logical discussion.







Post#3207 at 12-24-2012 04:29 PM by herbal tee [at joined Dec 2005 #posts 7,116]
---
12-24-2012, 04:29 PM #3207
Join Date
Dec 2005
Posts
7,116

Forefighters gunned down in western New York

Presented without comment.
Quote Originally Posted by yahoonews
man with a criminal history shot and killed two West Webster, N.Y. firefighters and seriously injured two others as they responded to a fire at his home., police say.

William Spengler, 62, apparently started a 5:35 a.m. fire at his home on Lake Road and then waited with an armament of weapons for first responders to arrive, Webster N.Y. Police Chief Gerald Pickering said at an afternoon news conference.

“He was shooting from high ground or a berm," Pickering said. "He was barricaded with weapons to shoot first responders."

After a brief exchange of gunfire with police, Spengler then shot and killed himself at the scene, Pickering said.
Last edited by herbal tee; 12-24-2012 at 04:44 PM.







Post#3208 at 12-24-2012 07:45 PM by Eric the Green [at San Jose CA joined Jul 2001 #posts 22,504]
---
12-24-2012, 07:45 PM #3208
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
San Jose CA
Posts
22,504

Quote Originally Posted by Kepi View Post
You are a condescending, ignorant manchild. There's no way to have an intelligent conversation with you, is there? You can't even be dragged kicking and screaming into a reasonable or logical discussion.
My over-the-top rhetoric was unfortunate, but it does appear that discussions between us are futile, and you have crossed the line.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive,

Eric A. Meece







Post#3209 at 12-24-2012 07:57 PM by Galen [at joined Aug 2010 #posts 1,017]
---
12-24-2012, 07:57 PM #3209
Join Date
Aug 2010
Posts
1,017

Quote Originally Posted by Kepi View Post
You are a condescending, ignorant manchild. There's no way to have an intelligent conversation with you, is there? You can't even be dragged kicking and screaming into a reasonable or logical discussion.
You are absolutely correct about Eric the Obtuse in this regard. His signature reflects the way he goes through life, with his eyes closed and believing that his imagination reflects the real world.
If one rejects laissez faire on account of mans fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action.
- Ludwig von Mises

Beware of altruism. It is based on self-deception, the root of all evil.
- Lazarus Long







Post#3210 at 12-24-2012 07:58 PM by Eric the Green [at San Jose CA joined Jul 2001 #posts 22,504]
---
12-24-2012, 07:58 PM #3210
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
San Jose CA
Posts
22,504

I am very proud of my signature line.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive,

Eric A. Meece







Post#3211 at 12-24-2012 08:00 PM by Kepi [at Northern, VA joined Nov 2012 #posts 3,664]
---
12-24-2012, 08:00 PM #3211
Join Date
Nov 2012
Location
Northern, VA
Posts
3,664

Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Green View Post
My over-the-top rhetoric was unfortunate, but it does appear that discussions between us are futile, and you have crossed the line.
Yes, your condescending attitude and ignorant rhetoric had nothing to do with it... It's totally me that crossed the line. Look, please ignore me. It'd be a blessing.







Post#3212 at 12-24-2012 08:03 PM by Galen [at joined Aug 2010 #posts 1,017]
---
12-24-2012, 08:03 PM #3212
Join Date
Aug 2010
Posts
1,017

Quote Originally Posted by Kepi View Post
Yes, your condescending attitude and ignorant rhetoric had nothing to do with it... It's totally me that crossed the line. Look, please ignore me. It'd be a blessing.
That is how I felt when he started ignoring me. Sadly, he stopped for some reason.
If one rejects laissez faire on account of mans fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action.
- Ludwig von Mises

Beware of altruism. It is based on self-deception, the root of all evil.
- Lazarus Long







Post#3213 at 12-25-2012 11:05 AM by Deb C [at joined Aug 2004 #posts 6,099]
---
12-25-2012, 11:05 AM #3213
Join Date
Aug 2004
Posts
6,099

I love this idea!

"The only Good America is a Just America." .... pbrower2a







Post#3214 at 12-25-2012 11:24 AM by B Butler [at joined Nov 2011 #posts 2,329]
---
12-25-2012, 11:24 AM #3214
Join Date
Nov 2011
Posts
2,329

Left Arrow Reality

Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Green View Post
I am very proud of my signature line.
You would be. It totally reflects your values. If one ignores reality, reality is good.







Post#3215 at 12-25-2012 12:26 PM by Chas'88 [at In between Pennsylvania & Pennsyltucky joined Nov 2008 #posts 9,432]
---
12-25-2012, 12:26 PM #3215
Join Date
Nov 2008
Location
In between Pennsylvania & Pennsyltucky
Posts
9,432

Quote Originally Posted by The Rani View Post
Or not:

How would your pooch react to an intruder?


Unless you're talking about having trained protection dogs in schools, accompanied by handlers who know how to manage them (i.e. keep them from attacking the kids.)
Another point from Greek Myth. Cerberus, the nasty three-headed dog that's supposed to guard the underworld? Yeah, you can easily sneak past him, as long as you've got food.

~Chas'88
"There have always been people who say: "The war will be over someday." I say there's no guarantee the war will ever be over. Naturally a brief intermission is conceivable. Maybe the war needs a breather, a war can even break its neck, so to speak. But the kings and emperors, not to mention the pope, will always come to its help in adversity. ON the whole, I'd say this war has very little to worry about, it'll live to a ripe old age."







Post#3216 at 12-25-2012 02:21 PM by Eric the Green [at San Jose CA joined Jul 2001 #posts 22,504]
---
12-25-2012, 02:21 PM #3216
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
San Jose CA
Posts
22,504

Quote Originally Posted by B Butler View Post
You would be. It totally reflects your values. If one ignores reality, reality is good.
Not at all. The bozos and unforgiving creeps like Galen don't have a clue. As Einstein said, imagination is more important than knowledge. The situation is more complicated than the creeps like Galen and stubborn fools like Kepi think. Ignorance is not good. But just because some people here are totally clueless and insulting, as you were here, or ignorant about some things, does not mean that my signature line is wrong. Debate here seems fruitless, especially with those who knock my siggie. Most people here do not budge from their opinions, no matter what anyone says. Your values are as "locked" as anyone else's, which this comment shows clearly. It's too bad, but this is not a good site anymore, and most people here live within a very narrow spectrum of "reality." No one wants to learn.

Reality is spirit, not matter, in my estimation. So there's no need to ignore "reality." Subjective and objective, real and ideal, are interdependent. A lot of what reality is now, is what has been created from vision in the past; or "created" by "God" (the intelligent universe doing its thing). Those who get my siggie, get it; those who don't, knock it. The real "liberals" are those who can see a better day, and work toward it as well as pray for it. JB does. "Some people look at things as they are and say why, others see things that never were and say why not," said RFK. I am an N type; so I agree with Robert Kennedy, and not with you and Galen and Kepi, et al.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive,

Eric A. Meece







Post#3217 at 12-25-2012 02:22 PM by Eric the Green [at San Jose CA joined Jul 2001 #posts 22,504]
---
12-25-2012, 02:22 PM #3217
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
San Jose CA
Posts
22,504

I agree with you Deb. There are better ways of protection.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive,

Eric A. Meece







Post#3218 at 12-25-2012 02:42 PM by pbrower2a [at "Michigrim" joined May 2005 #posts 15,014]
---
12-25-2012, 02:42 PM #3218
Join Date
May 2005
Location
"Michigrim"
Posts
15,014

Gun possession, gun violence, gun deaths. Guns may not kill people (it's the ammo), but they certainly make killing easy:



...Does anyone notice a political pattern?



No, Mr. Wang is not counting bears shot in Alaska, alligators shot in Louisiana, or pumas shot in Wyoming as "gun deaths".

Nevada and New Mexico are the only "blue" states that had extraordinarily-high rates of firearm death.

http://www.investingchannel.com/arti...e#.UNnv6nfheSo
The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid "dens of crime" (or) even in concentration camps and labour camps. In those we see its final result. But it is conceived and ordered... in clean, carpeted, warmed and well-lighted offices, by (those) who do not need to raise their voices. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern."


― C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters







Post#3219 at 12-25-2012 03:42 PM by Justin '77 [at Meh. joined Sep 2001 #posts 12,182]
---
12-25-2012, 03:42 PM #3219
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Meh.
Posts
12,182

Quote Originally Posted by pbrower2a View Post
Nevada and New Mexico are the only "blue" states that had extraordinarily-high rates of firearm death.

http://www.investingchannel.com/arti...e#.UNnv6nfheSo
Interesting. So the states where gun ownership is more common -- where the average person has a relatively higher familiarity with firearms -- also tend to have populaces less afraid of guns and more opposed to the idea that restricting them from private possession is a solution to anything.

The more knowledgeable a people are about guns, it seems, the less inclined they are to ban or restrict them. And the posters here most stridently opposed to private firearms are the ones most abjectly ignorant of them. Funny, that...
"Qu'est-ce que c'est que cela, la loi ? On peut donc être dehors. Je ne comprends pas. Quant à moi, suis-je dans la loi ? suis-je hors la loi ? Je n'en sais rien. Mourir de faim, est-ce être dans la loi ?" -- Tellmarch

"Человек не может снять с себя ответственности за свои поступки." - L. Tolstoy

"[it]
is no doubt obvious, the cult of the experts is both self-serving, for those who propound it, and fraudulent." - Noam Chomsky







Post#3220 at 12-25-2012 04:41 PM by Odin [at Moorhead, MN, USA joined Sep 2006 #posts 14,442]
---
12-25-2012, 04:41 PM #3220
Join Date
Sep 2006
Location
Moorhead, MN, USA
Posts
14,442

I'm surprised all the gun-nuts even dare show themselves here after Wayne LaPierre's showing of their tone-deafness twice live on national news.

All these "millitary-style" weapons should be banned, as should magazines holding more than 6 rounds. And I don't care about all the gun-nut rationalizations and prpaganda based on RW Libertarian fantasies of fighting off UN black helicopters, I am just going to ignore that shit. If it is not a gun designed for hunting, or a pistol designed for personal self-defense, you do not need it and should not be allowed to get it. Those things' only purpose is KILLING PEOPLE. If you are keeping a gun for self defense, get a Glock pistol, a Bushmaster assault rifle with 30-round magazines is overkill.
To recommend thrift to the poor is both grotesque and insulting. It is like advising a man who is starving to eat less.

-Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man under Socialism







Post#3221 at 12-25-2012 04:55 PM by pbrower2a [at "Michigrim" joined May 2005 #posts 15,014]
---
12-25-2012, 04:55 PM #3221
Join Date
May 2005
Location
"Michigrim"
Posts
15,014

Quote Originally Posted by Justin '77 View Post
Interesting. So the states where gun ownership is more common -- where the average person has a relatively higher familiarity with firearms -- also tend to have populaces less afraid of guns and more opposed to the idea that restricting them from private possession is a solution to anything.

The more knowledgeable a people are about guns, it seems, the less inclined they are to ban or restrict them. And the posters here most stridently opposed to private firearms are the ones most abjectly ignorant of them. Funny, that...
I have never owned or fired a gun. I am not and have never been a police officer or soldier. I have no desire to do sport hunting. Above all, I have never committed any violent crimes or dealt drugs. I have shot an arrow from a bow, but I was shooting at a target. I don't see target shooting in any way objectionable -- it is in the league with golf, not a violent activity. I don't have a problem with target shooting, sport hunting, or collection of antique weapons. But target shooters, sport hunters, and legitimate collectors have much sophistication about firearms. They select their guns with great care. The military and the police? They are heavily regulated. People amassing arsenals in the prospect that they might have to resist an American Gestapo or KGB? People would be wiser to watch the political trends that allow an extremist regime to flourish and oppose politicians who show contempt for the niceties of democratic process.

I don't provoke the police, and I have no business getting into a war zone. Someone collecting flintlock rifles knows his hobby as does a stamp collector. So one who has legitimate involvement with firearms usually has knowledge far above the average with weapons -- and had better, in view of their costs and dangers. If one has no involvement with firearms one usually knows little about them. I could say the same about stamp collecting -- one knows much about postage stamps if one is involved in it (or gets it quickly if one is a curious and active novice). Of course one can do little harm with a postage stamp as a collector. A firearm is a different matter; it is inherently dangerous. Then there are the gangsters.

Street criminals who use guns aren't so knowledgeable about firearms. They have specific purposes -- to kill or maim someone, or to scare someone into surrendering property or submitting to rape. The garden-variety armed robber is a dope addict or a near-moron who doesn't know the subtle distinctions between guns. Any dimwit can use a gun for the wrong reasons. I see the stats and recognize that a firearm is a tool that any dimwit can use to kill someone with ease. Maybe there are gun-using subcultures that use their arms wisely and aren't particularly dangerous. Such subcultures as a rule know how lethal a firearm is and distinguish themselves readily from armed robbers and gangland enforcers.

I know little about guns, but I understand statistics very well. Because I have no reason to know much about firearms I don't accumulate the knowledge. The statistics show a strong positive correlation between a widespread ownership of firearms and deaths from firearms. Hawaii, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, and New Jersey have the lowest rates of gun ownership and very low rates of firearm deaths. South Dakota isn't much worse in deaths from firearms despite being toward the top in firearm possession per person, but its gun-death rate is still higher than that of the low-gun cluster.



Maybe South Dakota has a large gun subculture that acts responsibly. But what about neighboring Montana and Wyoming? What is wrong with Arizona, which has a near-average rate of gun ownership but a high rate of firearm-based deaths? Urban gangs, perhaps?
The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid "dens of crime" (or) even in concentration camps and labour camps. In those we see its final result. But it is conceived and ordered... in clean, carpeted, warmed and well-lighted offices, by (those) who do not need to raise their voices. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern."


― C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters







Post#3222 at 12-25-2012 05:26 PM by Copperfield [at joined Feb 2010 #posts 2,244]
---
12-25-2012, 05:26 PM #3222
Join Date
Feb 2010
Posts
2,244

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
I'm surprised all the gun-nuts even dare show themselves here after Wayne LaPierre's showing of their tone-deafness twice live on national news.

All these "millitary-style" weapons should be banned, as should magazines holding more than 6 rounds. And I don't care about all the gun-nut rationalizations and prpaganda based on RW Libertarian fantasies of fighting off UN black helicopters, I am just going to ignore that shit. If it is not a gun designed for hunting, or a pistol designed for personal self-defense, you do not need it and should not be allowed to get it. Those things' only purpose is KILLING PEOPLE. If you are keeping a gun for self defense, get a Glock pistol, a Bushmaster assault rifle with 30-round magazines is overkill.
I'll bet real money that Glock pistols killed more people than Bushmaster rifles last year Odin.







Post#3223 at 12-25-2012 05:34 PM by Copperfield [at joined Feb 2010 #posts 2,244]
---
12-25-2012, 05:34 PM #3223
Join Date
Feb 2010
Posts
2,244

Quote Originally Posted by The Rani View Post
Or not:

How would your pooch react to an intruder?


Unless you're talking about having trained protection dogs in schools, accompanied by handlers who know how to manage them (i.e. keep them from attacking the kids.)
Ah yes, the always comical dog argument. We had some new neighbors move in upstairs, including a big, burly, and quite loud pit bull. When I first met him he attempted to intimidate me with all of his bluster and might. That lasted... Oh all of about 10 seconds. Now he's my new buddy.

Not surprisingly, dog intimidation only works on people who are afraid of dogs.







Post#3224 at 12-25-2012 06:08 PM by Justin '77 [at Meh. joined Sep 2001 #posts 12,182]
---
12-25-2012, 06:08 PM #3224
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Meh.
Posts
12,182

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
I'm surprised all the gun-nuts even dare show themselves here after Wayne LaPierre's showing of their tone-deafness twice live on national news.
Of course, thinking people (of which I'm sure there are more than a few on all sides) recognize that Wayne LaPierre shows only the tone-deafness of Wayne LaPierre. Oh, and if he is permitted to remain in his position given that tone-deafness, additionally you might argue, of the voting majority of the members of a very small political lobbying organization.

I presume he doesn't speak for gun owners in your neck of the woods, eh Odin? The ones you know almost certainly aren't such delusional asses as Mr. LaPierre? Funny thing is, the one's you know are the norm, not the exceptions.
"Qu'est-ce que c'est que cela, la loi ? On peut donc être dehors. Je ne comprends pas. Quant à moi, suis-je dans la loi ? suis-je hors la loi ? Je n'en sais rien. Mourir de faim, est-ce être dans la loi ?" -- Tellmarch

"Человек не может снять с себя ответственности за свои поступки." - L. Tolstoy

"[it]
is no doubt obvious, the cult of the experts is both self-serving, for those who propound it, and fraudulent." - Noam Chomsky







Post#3225 at 12-25-2012 07:37 PM by Eric the Green [at San Jose CA joined Jul 2001 #posts 22,504]
---
12-25-2012, 07:37 PM #3225
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
San Jose CA
Posts
22,504

Quote Originally Posted by Justin '77 View Post
Interesting. So the states where gun ownership is more common -- where the average person has a relatively higher familiarity with firearms -- also tend to have populaces less afraid of guns and more opposed to the idea that restricting them from private possession is a solution to anything.

The more knowledgeable a people are about guns, it seems, the less inclined they are to ban or restrict them. And the posters here most stridently opposed to private firearms are the ones most abjectly ignorant of them. Funny, that...
Not really. Why should we be experts about guns? People who know a lot about guns, are people who are interested in guns and thus know more about them, or at least claim to know. I know enough, and have learned enough more, to know what the facts are. Why should people be interested in guns? Guns have one purpose: to kill, primarily to kill other people. Those of us who are not interested in that, are not especially interested in guns. And I know that semi-automatics are not hunting rifles, but that doesn't stop some here from just going right on and denying that fact, and then insulting people who disagree with them by calling them ignorant children who don't engage in honest discussion.

It's too bad, but I didn't want to get involved in this pointless gun debate. It was my mistake to get drawn into it. It is a stupid debate, and people all have their minds made up. It is something to learn more about; but debate? Forget it.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive,

Eric A. Meece
-----------------------------------------