Generational Dynamics
Fourth Turning Forum Archive


Popular links:
Generational Dynamics Web Site
Generational Dynamics Forum
Fourth Turning Archive home page
New Fourth Turning Forum

Thread: The Spiral of Violence - Page 172







Post#4276 at 04-30-2013 06:44 PM by Copperfield [at joined Feb 2010 #posts 2,244]
---
04-30-2013, 06:44 PM #4276
Join Date
Feb 2010
Posts
2,244

Quote Originally Posted by JordanGoodspeed View Post
Try selling food out of your kitchen, too. You're be amazed as to the extent to which food safety regulations are tilted towards businesses able to buy expensive, industrial scale equipment. It's not just a matter of keeping things clean, but having specific pieces of equipment or services available, which are much easier to procure as a multinational corporation than it is as a mom and pop shop. Which is too bad, as those small businesses are the ones that employ the most Americans, and keep their money in the community.. It's a bit like income taxes, which purport to be progressive but really impact the middle and upper middle classes the most, as the truly rich don't really live off of income.

Just different ways for the different wings of the elite to screw you over.
I had a front row seat to the state-sponsored destruction of family farming in the early 80's. There is no opportunity for amazement. I lived it.







Post#4277 at 04-30-2013 07:06 PM by Eric the Green [at San Jose CA joined Jul 2001 #posts 22,504]
---
04-30-2013, 07:06 PM #4277
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
San Jose CA
Posts
22,504

Quote Originally Posted by Copperfield View Post
Not some, Eric. Government establishes the parameters and charters by which modern corporations exist. The term itself if a legal term, which is to say, something defined and enforced entirely by government.
Most of what a corporation does is written by the corporation itself in its own bylaws and internal regulations. The most powerful bosses in society are corporate bosses, and they are also the bosses that rule our politics, because of whom we vote for.

As for the rest, you elect from among the small pile of those already selected for you. It’s an important distinction to make for a slave and sadly not one that is often made, let alone understood. In short, you are allowed the illusion of choice.
People pretty much decide for themselves to get involved in politics, like my own Rep. Anna Eshoo did. she worked in a factory. No-one tapped her on the shoulder and chose her to be a politician. People rise through the ranks and run for office, and people elect them. There's no-one selecting our candidates for us, except for the fact that we the people have decided that the wealthy should have a distinct advantage. we could UN-decide that, by throwing Republicans out of office. They gave us Citizens United, and no-one else. But even then, more money does not guarantee victory if the voters are smart. Witness Meg Whitman vs. Jerry Brown. Whitman lost; the better candidate won.
Of course one could also point out the cowardice implied by taking part in a process that has the ultimate goal of meekly requesting another speak to the powerful in your stead, alongside the stupidity of assuming that particular other has and will continue to have any interests in mind other than his or her own. The simple act of taking part in said process validates and legitimizes every single crime they commit in your name. It is indeed your fault, but not because you vote for the wrong people. It’s your fault because you allow them to exist at all.
It is simple practicality. One person speaking does not a society make. We must appoint people to run government for us. It is amazingly naive for you to trot out that statement again. Didn't you take any civics classes? Young man, you need to go back to school.
Last edited by Eric the Green; 04-30-2013 at 08:18 PM.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive,

Eric A. Meece







Post#4278 at 04-30-2013 08:11 PM by Deb C [at joined Aug 2004 #posts 6,099]
---
04-30-2013, 08:11 PM #4278
Join Date
Aug 2004
Posts
6,099

Quote Originally Posted by Copperfield View Post
Seriously? The Rani quite recently posted a great example on this very thread.

I myself have mentioned on more than one occasion the advent and more recent distortion of Intellectual Property law.

Perhaps a more recent law is more to your liking? We could also delve into state-granted monopoly (try building an electrical generator in your back yard with the intent to sell power and see what happens), tariffs, taxes, zoning, and protection from tort. There are probably thousands of other examples.

I mean you don’t actually think that it’s an accident that McDonald’s (among others) spends millions of dollars lobbying for increased regulation do you?
I understand quite well about what deregulation has accomplished; a government for the corporation. I also understand the growing fascism in this country. But having said this, I also think there are some laws that benefit the citizens. Yes, there are fewer everyday, but *some* still do a decent job. I kinda like the idea that doctors, nurses, daycare centers, and drivers have to be licensed. Not to mention those inconvenient stop lights.
"The only Good America is a Just America." .... pbrower2a







Post#4279 at 04-30-2013 08:12 PM by JordanGoodspeed [at joined Mar 2013 #posts 3,587]
---
04-30-2013, 08:12 PM #4279
Join Date
Mar 2013
Posts
3,587

Quote Originally Posted by Copperfield View Post
I had a front row seat to the state-sponsored destruction of family farming in the early 80's. There is no opportunity for amazement. I lived it.
Ooh, farming, there is a much better example. There, the government not only set up standards that supported the wealthy and powerful (corporations), they actively subsidize them. People who want to talk about how "efficient" factory farming is should ask to see it in action without state support for capital expenditures and the like.







Post#4280 at 04-30-2013 08:17 PM by Deb C [at joined Aug 2004 #posts 6,099]
---
04-30-2013, 08:17 PM #4280
Join Date
Aug 2004
Posts
6,099

Quote Originally Posted by JordanGoodspeed View Post
Ooh, farming, there is a much better example. There, the government not only set up standards that supported the wealthy and powerful (corporations), they actively subsidize them. People who want to talk about how "efficient" factory farming is should ask to see it in action without state support for capital expenditures and the like.
Factory farming, in most cases, has been the major reason that our food is less safe.
"The only Good America is a Just America." .... pbrower2a







Post#4281 at 04-30-2013 08:18 PM by Copperfield [at joined Feb 2010 #posts 2,244]
---
04-30-2013, 08:18 PM #4281
Join Date
Feb 2010
Posts
2,244

Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Green View Post
Most of what a corporation does is written by the corporation itself in its own bylaws and internal regulations. The most powerful bosses in society are corporate bosses, and they are also the bosses the rule our politics, because of whom we vote for.
Completely irrelevant insofar as their power (that is the actual power over others) comes only from government mandate through law, regulation and services rendered (see: previous post). The internal day-to-day decisions are generally irrelevant to society as if you don’t like them, you can simply opt out (as in don’t support financially through purchase or labor).


Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Green View Post
People pretty much decide for themselves to get involved in politics, like my own Rep. Anna Eshoo did. she worked in a factory. No-one tapped her on the shoulder and chose her to be a politician. People rise through the ranks and run for office, and people elect them. There's no-one selecting our candidates for us, except for the fact that we the people have decided that the wealthy should have a distinct advantage. we could UN-decide that, by throwing Republicans out of office. They gave us Citizens United, and no-one else. But even then, more money does not guarantee victory if the voters are smart. Witness Meg Whitman vs. Jerry Brown. Whitman lost; the better candidate won.
And yet all of those candidates were vetted and supported to varying degrees by the local, regional and national political machinery. One cannot simply walk down to the local democrat headquarters and run for president as a democrat. The people who rise through the ranks are those whom the political royalty class deem worthy. Even the alleged “mavericks” of either party serve as useful error correction by giving any disgruntled peasants (who might be running the risk of a full-blown realization of the game in progress at their expense) a “dark horse” to root for who is allowed to stray marginally off-message.

Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Green View Post
It is simple practicality. One person speaking does not a society make. We must appoint people to run government for us. It is amazingly naive for you to trot out that statement again. Didn't you take any civics classes? Young man, you need to go back to school.
Of course not. One person speaking is one person speaking. That’s all it is supposed to be and frankly represents all of the voice that anyone actually deserves. You represent and speak for yourself. I represent and speak for myself. In the ways that we find we can cooperate, we can choose to do so. In the ways we can’t, we won’t.

As for civics class, I already received my in that class a long time ago.







Post#4282 at 04-30-2013 08:20 PM by Eric the Green [at San Jose CA joined Jul 2001 #posts 22,504]
---
04-30-2013, 08:20 PM #4282
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
San Jose CA
Posts
22,504

Quote Originally Posted by Deb C View Post
Factory farming, in most cases, has been the major reason that our food is less safe.
I second that one, Deb and Jordan.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive,

Eric A. Meece







Post#4283 at 04-30-2013 08:30 PM by Copperfield [at joined Feb 2010 #posts 2,244]
---
04-30-2013, 08:30 PM #4283
Join Date
Feb 2010
Posts
2,244

Quote Originally Posted by Deb C View Post
I understand quite well about what deregulation has accomplished; a government for the corporation. I also understand the growing fascism in this country. But having said this, I also think there are some laws that benefit the citizens. Yes, there are fewer everyday, but *some* still do a decent job. I kinda like the idea that doctors, nurses, daycare centers, and drivers have to be licensed. Not to mention those inconvenient stop lights.
No, no Deb. Here is where you start to head off the tracks. Not less regulation. Real, tangible, actual more regulation (as in bigger, better, faster). It's important that you realize this if you want to understand the wrong-parts of how things really operate in the world, and in all honesty I encourage you to delve into corporate law. I cannot stress this enough: The modern corporation exists because of government, law and regulation, not in spite of it. This is perhaps one of the most important realizations a person living in the world today can have.







Post#4284 at 04-30-2013 08:36 PM by Eric the Green [at San Jose CA joined Jul 2001 #posts 22,504]
---
04-30-2013, 08:36 PM #4284
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
San Jose CA
Posts
22,504

Quote Originally Posted by Copperfield View Post
Completely irrelevant insofar as their power (that is the actual power over others) comes only from government mandate through law, regulation and services rendered (see: previous post). The internal day-to-day decisions are generally irrelevant to society as if you don’t like them, you can simply opt out (as in don’t support financially through purchase or labor).
Saying corporattions need some government laws and services to function, just as all of us do, is not the same as saying government controls corporations. Their power comes through government in so far as we have a money system that is enforced by law. You can't opt out; corporations not only provide the jobs and products that many people use, thus controlling our economy, but they control the environment that is not safe because of their behavior. That extends to global warming, GMOs, factory farming, destruction of communities; well, it's a long, long list. They also control our government (not vice-versa) because of their lobbying and campaign financing. We can change that, but that requires citizen action and voting, which you don't agree with. I know you will go to any length to deny the obvious, so keep going.


And yet all of those candidates were vetted and supported to varying degrees by the local, regional and national political machinery. One cannot simply walk down to the local democrat headquarters and run for president as a democrat. The people who rise through the ranks are those whom the political royalty class deem worthy. Even the alleged “mavericks” of either party serve as useful error correction by giving any disgruntled peasants (who might be running the risk of a full-blown realization of the game in progress at their expense) a “dark horse” to root for who is allowed to stray marginally off-message.
All of that doesn't matter. Anyone can run for office. If you are only concerned about who can be elected president, that's a very narrow concern. But even that depends on people being willing to run. Those who run are those who choose to do so. If they have established themselves as viable candidates, that's because they did the work to do that. Romney made a fortune as an entrepreneur and capitalist pig, and then got himself elected governor. Obama wrote a couple of good books, and then gave a great speech and got himself elected Senator. They paid their dues to run. Powerful people don't make these candidates; they make themselves. If only a certain range of views are acceptable to the voters, that is entirely and only the peoples' fault. The duopoly party system is not good, but the system can be changed.

Of course not. One person speaking is one person speaking. That’s all it is supposed to be and frankly represents all of the voice that anyone actually deserves. You represent and speak for yourself. I represent and speak for myself. In the ways that we find we can cooperate, we can choose to do so. In the ways we can’t, we won’t.
Life on earth requires that cooperation. That's why we have governments. Our ancestors chose our system, and it has been modified ever since according to the wishes of the people. We are not individuals; that is just an erroneous worldview. But then I already know how limited and false your worldview is. That's another can of worms.
As for civics class, I already received my in that class a long time ago.
You flunk! You need to go back again.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive,

Eric A. Meece







Post#4285 at 04-30-2013 08:37 PM by Copperfield [at joined Feb 2010 #posts 2,244]
---
04-30-2013, 08:37 PM #4285
Join Date
Feb 2010
Posts
2,244

Quote Originally Posted by Deb C View Post
I kinda like the idea that doctors, nurses, daycare centers, and drivers have to be licensed. Not to mention those inconvenient stop lights.
Oh and it's a bit of a bummer you prefer these folks to be licensed. I myself prefer them to be exceptional at what they do. Big difference.

Put another way, what's the difference between the licenses of a doctor who got a C average in school and one who got an A average?







Post#4286 at 04-30-2013 08:42 PM by Eric the Green [at San Jose CA joined Jul 2001 #posts 22,504]
---
04-30-2013, 08:42 PM #4286
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
San Jose CA
Posts
22,504

Quote Originally Posted by Copperfield View Post
No, no Deb. Here is where you start to head off the tracks. Not less regulation. Real, tangible, actual more regulation (as in bigger, better, faster). It's important that you realize this if you want to understand the wrong-parts of how things really operate in the world, and in all honesty I encourage you to delve into corporate law. I cannot stress this enough: The modern corporation exists because of government, law and regulation, not in spite of it. This is perhaps one of the most important realizations a person living in the world today can have.
I can't speak for Deb, but I find that one of the craziest ideas I have ever heard. So Rockefeller, Ford, Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, went to their local government office and said, oh sir, will you set up and run a company for me? I know you'll do it all for me, because copperfield told me that "corporations exist because of government." So when can I start, your honor? I'll be waiting for your call, sir.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive,

Eric A. Meece







Post#4287 at 04-30-2013 08:43 PM by Copperfield [at joined Feb 2010 #posts 2,244]
---
04-30-2013, 08:43 PM #4287
Join Date
Feb 2010
Posts
2,244

Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Green View Post
You flunk! You need to go back again.
No thanks, my tolerance for state propaganda is pretty low these days.







Post#4288 at 04-30-2013 08:46 PM by princeofcats67 [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 1,995]
---
04-30-2013, 08:46 PM #4288
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
1,995

Quote Originally Posted by Copperfield View Post
No, no Deb. Here is where you start to head off the tracks. Not less regulation. Real, tangible, actual more regulation (as in bigger, better, faster). It's important that you realize this if you want to understand the wrong-parts of how things really operate in the world, and in all honesty I encourage you to delve into corporate law. I cannot stress this enough: The modern corporation exists because of government, law and regulation, not in spite of it. This is perhaps one of the most important realizations a person living in the world today can have.
You know Copper, sometimes it's just a fucking brick wall.


Prince
I Am A Child of God/Nature/The Universe
I Think Globally and Act Individually(and possibly, voluntarily join-together with Others)
I Pray for World Peace & I Choose Less-Just Say: "NO!, Thank You."







Post#4289 at 04-30-2013 08:47 PM by Copperfield [at joined Feb 2010 #posts 2,244]
---
04-30-2013, 08:47 PM #4289
Join Date
Feb 2010
Posts
2,244

Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Green View Post
I can't speak for Deb, but I find that one of the craziest ideas I have ever heard. So Rockefeller, Ford, Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, went to their local government office and said, oh sir, will you set up and run a company for me? I know you'll do it all for me, because copperfield told me that "corporations exist because of government." So when can I start, your honor? I'll be waiting for your call, sir.
Actually that's sort of how it works, except for the whole asking the government to "run it for them" part.







Post#4290 at 04-30-2013 08:51 PM by Copperfield [at joined Feb 2010 #posts 2,244]
---
04-30-2013, 08:51 PM #4290
Join Date
Feb 2010
Posts
2,244

Quote Originally Posted by princeofcats67 View Post
You know Copper, sometimes it's just a fucking brick wall.


Prince
Heh, it is indeed. To Deb's credit though, she is closer than most to clearing enough bricks to squeeze through.







Post#4291 at 04-30-2013 08:55 PM by Deb C [at joined Aug 2004 #posts 6,099]
---
04-30-2013, 08:55 PM #4291
Join Date
Aug 2004
Posts
6,099

Quote Originally Posted by Copperfield View Post

Put another way, what's the difference between the licenses of a doctor who got a C average in school and one who got an A average?
I would prefer either of those, compared to a med student who flunked out and still decided to market him/her self as a doctor. Although I think I've met some of those.
"The only Good America is a Just America." .... pbrower2a







Post#4292 at 04-30-2013 09:17 PM by Copperfield [at joined Feb 2010 #posts 2,244]
---
04-30-2013, 09:17 PM #4292
Join Date
Feb 2010
Posts
2,244

Quote Originally Posted by JordanGoodspeed View Post
Ooh, farming, there is a much better example. There, the government not only set up standards that supported the wealthy and powerful (corporations), they actively subsidize them. People who want to talk about how "efficient" factory farming is should ask to see it in action without state support for capital expenditures and the like.
There are precious few family farms left in the country at this point and those that are hanging on have a monumentally hard time making a go of it. Dreadfully few Americans have any concept of where food even comes from.







Post#4293 at 04-30-2013 09:20 PM by princeofcats67 [at joined Jan 2010 #posts 1,995]
---
04-30-2013, 09:20 PM #4293
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
1,995

Quote Originally Posted by Copperfield View Post
Heh, it is indeed. To Deb's credit though, she is closer than most to clearing enough bricks to squeeze through.
I agree. Deb's pretty cool in my book(for the most part ).


Prince

PS:
To Deb:
I seriously meant no slam on you personally, Deb.
(IMO, we've got a pretty cool history, you and I!)
Last edited by princeofcats67; 04-30-2013 at 09:43 PM. Reason: Grammar. Aghhh!
I Am A Child of God/Nature/The Universe
I Think Globally and Act Individually(and possibly, voluntarily join-together with Others)
I Pray for World Peace & I Choose Less-Just Say: "NO!, Thank You."







Post#4294 at 04-30-2013 09:46 PM by Deb C [at joined Aug 2004 #posts 6,099]
---
04-30-2013, 09:46 PM #4294
Join Date
Aug 2004
Posts
6,099

Quote Originally Posted by princeofcats67 View Post
PS:
To Deb:
I seriously meant no slam on you personally, Deb.
(IMO, we've got a pretty cool history, me and you!)
Careful there, Prince, we don't want to start any rumors.
"The only Good America is a Just America." .... pbrower2a







Post#4295 at 04-30-2013 09:52 PM by Marx & Lennon [at '47 cohort still lost in Falwelland joined Sep 2001 #posts 16,709]
---
04-30-2013, 09:52 PM #4295
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
'47 cohort still lost in Falwelland
Posts
16,709

Quote Originally Posted by Deb C View Post
This is a case in point where corporations have more clout than citizens. Factory farming is known for it's abuses, not only of animals, but also the environment and communities where they reside. When oversight and regulations on corporations get watered down in favor of the mega corporation, as they are now, things will only continue to get worse.
But arrogance always leads to overreach, and this preemptive gagging of the press is right up there with gagging the NY Times and Washington Post on the Pentagon Papers. With any luck, this will generate more blowback than protection for the Tyson's of the world.
Marx: Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.
Lennon: You either get tired fighting for peace, or you die.







Post#4296 at 04-30-2013 09:59 PM by Deb C [at joined Aug 2004 #posts 6,099]
---
04-30-2013, 09:59 PM #4296
Join Date
Aug 2004
Posts
6,099

Quote Originally Posted by Marx & Lennon View Post
But arrogance always leads to overreach, and this preemptive gagging of the press is right up there with gagging the NY Times and Washington Post on the Pentagon Papers. With any luck, this will generate more blowback than protection for the Tyson's of the world.
At least the ACLU is making an attempt to address the problem. If it gets any substantial traction, is a whole other question.

Last edited by Deb C; 04-30-2013 at 10:39 PM.
"The only Good America is a Just America." .... pbrower2a







Post#4297 at 05-01-2013 05:40 AM by Marx & Lennon [at '47 cohort still lost in Falwelland joined Sep 2001 #posts 16,709]
---
05-01-2013, 05:40 AM #4297
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
'47 cohort still lost in Falwelland
Posts
16,709

Quote Originally Posted by Deb C View Post
At least the ACLU is making an attempt to address the problem. If it gets any substantial traction, is a whole other question.
To get this resolved in the courts, you need a test case. Apparently, there is one now. Let's see how that's handled.
Marx: Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.
Lennon: You either get tired fighting for peace, or you die.







Post#4298 at 05-01-2013 09:56 AM by Justin '77 [at Meh. joined Sep 2001 #posts 12,182]
---
05-01-2013, 09:56 AM #4298
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Meh.
Posts
12,182

Quote Originally Posted by Deb C View Post
Would you give some examples of how laws and regulations maintain the wealth of corporations?
The nature of chartering already does that. I'm sure you've heard of "limited liability"? What more fundamental maintenance of wealth and power could there be than a legal regime that lets the wealthy act with protection from the negative consequences of their actions? Everything else beyond that is just details.
"Qu'est-ce que c'est que cela, la loi ? On peut donc être dehors. Je ne comprends pas. Quant à moi, suis-je dans la loi ? suis-je hors la loi ? Je n'en sais rien. Mourir de faim, est-ce être dans la loi ?" -- Tellmarch

"Человек не может снять с себя ответственности за свои поступки." - L. Tolstoy

"[it]
is no doubt obvious, the cult of the experts is both self-serving, for those who propound it, and fraudulent." - Noam Chomsky







Post#4299 at 05-01-2013 11:17 AM by pbrower2a [at "Michigrim" joined May 2005 #posts 15,014]
---
05-01-2013, 11:17 AM #4299
Join Date
May 2005
Location
"Michigrim"
Posts
15,014

Quote Originally Posted by Justin '77 View Post
The nature of chartering already does that. I'm sure you've heard of "limited liability"? What more fundamental maintenance of wealth and power could there be than a legal regime that lets the wealthy act with protection from the negative consequences of their actions? Everything else beyond that is just details.
Limited liability allows people to invest without risking more than their investment due to the decisions of management because shareholders have no involvement in the day-to-day operations of a business. Without limited liability, investment would be far riskier than it now is. If you want to work for a giant business you need giant corporations.

The problem is that corporate charters almost never come to an end except through bankruptcy and liquidation or through acquisition of the corporation by another corporation. Repeal of a corporate proxy almost never occurs for corporate misconduct.
The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid "dens of crime" (or) even in concentration camps and labour camps. In those we see its final result. But it is conceived and ordered... in clean, carpeted, warmed and well-lighted offices, by (those) who do not need to raise their voices. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern."


― C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters







Post#4300 at 05-01-2013 01:54 PM by Justin '77 [at Meh. joined Sep 2001 #posts 12,182]
---
05-01-2013, 01:54 PM #4300
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Meh.
Posts
12,182

Quote Originally Posted by pbrower2a View Post
Limited liability allows people to invest without risking more than their investment due to the decisions of management because shareholders have no involvement in the day-to-day operations of a business. Without limited liability, investment would be far riskier than it now is.
This is true. Of course, what you are saying is that, without legal protection from the consequences of the actions of the people they give money to, people would have to be a lot more careful who they gave their money to. Which is not only true, but very much exactly the point I was making. Limited liability is a necessary precondition for systemic irresponsible business practices. That is, in fact, the sole point of its existence -- to allow people to be insulated from the consequences of their irresponsible, reckless, negligent, and/or grossly-harmful behavior.

The entire argument for limited liability, stripped of the for-the-serfs'-own-good verbiage, is quite simply, "We [the owners] are much less likely to engage in risky actions unless someone else besides us is forced to assume the risk. But we keep the reward (natch)".
"Qu'est-ce que c'est que cela, la loi ? On peut donc être dehors. Je ne comprends pas. Quant à moi, suis-je dans la loi ? suis-je hors la loi ? Je n'en sais rien. Mourir de faim, est-ce être dans la loi ?" -- Tellmarch

"Человек не может снять с себя ответственности за свои поступки." - L. Tolstoy

"[it]
is no doubt obvious, the cult of the experts is both self-serving, for those who propound it, and fraudulent." - Noam Chomsky
-----------------------------------------