THE UNDERSTATED 192,000 GAIN in nonfarm payroll employment probably reflects the vagaries of seasonal adjustment.
The actual tally of job change from one month to the next is usually quite different from the headline figures reported. As with virtually all economic data, in order to adjust for "normal seasonal variation" in the monthly figures—and to try to get at the underlying trend—the numbers are seasonally adjusted. This is done according to extremely sophisticated statistical methods. But since there is always drift in seasonal patterns, it's ultimately an art as much as a science.
This time, the art might have gotten too artsy. The BLS reported that, before seasonal adjustment, February's nonfarm payroll gain ran not at 192,000, but
816,000, a figure that rivals not-seasonally-adjusted gains in February 2005 and February 2006—years when increases after seasonal adjustment were much higher than 192,000. In fact, according to the calculations of Wrightson ICAP's chief economist, Louis Crandall, the seasonally adjusted gain last month would have exceeded 300,000 had last year's seasonal factors been used.