Generational Dynamics
Fourth Turning Forum Archive


Popular links:
Generational Dynamics Web Site
Generational Dynamics Forum
Fourth Turning Archive home page
New Fourth Turning Forum

Thread: 2012 Elections - Page 316







Post#7876 at 03-21-2012 08:12 AM by ASB65 [at Texas joined Mar 2010 #posts 5,892]
---
03-21-2012, 08:12 AM #7876
Join Date
Mar 2010
Location
Texas
Posts
5,892

Quote Originally Posted by KaiserD2 View Post
Exit polls show 98% of voters in the Republican Illinois primary were white and 17% (sic) were under 40. The Republicans are in big trouble come November.
Illinois is a blue state because of Chicago. And that is where most of the population of the state is located. Chicago is overwhelming Democratic. Down state and rural Illinois tend to lean towards the Republicans. The breakdown you described pretty much fits make up of the rest of the state where the Republican voters are. They are older and white. The young people and the minorities are mainly in Chicago or the suburbs. So this poll doesn't surprise me at all.







Post#7877 at 03-21-2012 09:45 AM by Justin '77 [at Meh. joined Sep 2001 #posts 12,182]
---
03-21-2012, 09:45 AM #7877
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Meh.
Posts
12,182

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.
Orwell put it much more succinctly:

War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength


(then again, Orwell also bemoaned the logorrhea that in his time was coming to overwhelm written discourse.. succinct was kind of a big thing with him)
"Qu'est-ce que c'est que cela, la loi ? On peut donc être dehors. Je ne comprends pas. Quant à moi, suis-je dans la loi ? suis-je hors la loi ? Je n'en sais rien. Mourir de faim, est-ce être dans la loi ?" -- Tellmarch

"Человек не может снять с себя ответственности за свои поступки." - L. Tolstoy

"[it]
is no doubt obvious, the cult of the experts is both self-serving, for those who propound it, and fraudulent." - Noam Chomsky







Post#7878 at 03-21-2012 10:13 AM by The Grey Badger [at Albuquerque, NM joined Sep 2001 #posts 8,876]
---
03-21-2012, 10:13 AM #7878
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Posts
8,876

Quote Originally Posted by Exile 67' View Post
Are you on the Left or are you part of The Left or are you The Left?
On the Left politically, inactive enough not to claim to be part of it.
How to spot a shill, by John Michael Greer: "What you watch for is (a) a brand new commenter who (b) has nothing to say about the topic under discussion but (c) trots out a smoothly written opinion piece that (d) hits all the standard talking points currently being used by a specific political or corporate interest, while (e) avoiding any other points anyone else has made on that subject."

"If the shoe fits..." The Grey Badger.







Post#7879 at 03-21-2012 12:22 PM by Wallace 88 [at joined Dec 2010 #posts 1,232]
---
03-21-2012, 12:22 PM #7879
Join Date
Dec 2010
Posts
1,232

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
The ***hole yelling the "stop raping people" lies dropped dead a couple weeks ago. Karma's a b*tch.
What lies? The rapes and murders at occupy rallies is documented.







Post#7880 at 03-21-2012 12:23 PM by Wallace 88 [at joined Dec 2010 #posts 1,232]
---
03-21-2012, 12:23 PM #7880
Join Date
Dec 2010
Posts
1,232

Quote Originally Posted by antichrist View Post
Odin, you might be one of the most bigoted people on this forum.
I think he is the most bigoted and hateful person on this forum.

He has no self awareness at all.







Post#7881 at 03-21-2012 01:11 PM by playwrite [at NYC joined Jul 2005 #posts 10,443]
---
03-21-2012, 01:11 PM #7881
Join Date
Jul 2005
Location
NYC
Posts
10,443

Quote Originally Posted by KaiserD2 View Post
Exit polls show 98% of voters in the Republican Illinois primary were white and 17% (sic) were under 40. The Republicans are in big trouble come November.
... and imagine after 2012.

Was 2010 their last big hooray? They're going to try to make it 2012 but it’s based on the falsehood of blame and a constrained Obama. I don't think it likely but it is possible. The thing is, with what is to come, their winning the Presidency might actually accelerate their more general withering in the down-the-ballot elections. I see 2016 as where the pivot will become clear to most.

With all the gerrymandering since Reagan, it will take some time, to move down below the national Presidential level. Then comes their regionalization that will eventually make them a permanent minority in the House. But they will remain a force in the archaic Senate for far into the future; same with the SCOTUS. That may keep the Dems unified enough not to split with a more conservative element taking up some of the less crazed remaining in the GOP and making what is left there mostly irrelevant (except, again, in the Senate until the Dems can get over 60 or change the rules).

The change is inevitable though.

There is some chance that the GOP may change within (e.g., Michael Steele, Joe Scarborough have gotten more interesting since removing themselves from the election frays), but I doubt it. Also, there is some chance the expanding minorities, particularly Hispanics, might move in their direction on social issues, but the current GOP certainly isn’t working hard to open the door to that possibility and besides a lot of the social issues may become locked in (e.g. gay marriage) and not worth socially-conservative minorities trading off of their economic interest. For the latter, as time goes by, it will become much clearer how economically harmful what the GOP actualy offers the vast majority of voters (e.g. maybe even Kansas will finally "get it") and that will greatly hasten their demise from political power.

There is, however, the issue of possible violent reactions to being backed into a corner.
"The Devil enters the prompter's box and the play is ready to start" - R. Service

“It’s not tax money. The banks have accounts with the Fed … so, to lend to a bank, we simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account that they have with the Fed. It’s much more akin to printing money.” - B.Bernanke


"Keep your filthy hands off my guns while I decide what you can & can't do with your uterus" - Sarah Silverman

If you meet a magic pony on the road, kill it. - Playwrite







Post#7882 at 03-21-2012 01:41 PM by Odin [at Moorhead, MN, USA joined Sep 2006 #posts 14,442]
---
03-21-2012, 01:41 PM #7882
Join Date
Sep 2006
Location
Moorhead, MN, USA
Posts
14,442

Quote Originally Posted by Justin '77 View Post
Orwell put it much more succinctly:

War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength


(then again, Orwell also bemoaned the logorrhea that in his time was coming to overwhelm written discourse.. succinct was kind of a big thing with him)
Remember that Popper, who was of Jewish background, left his Native Austria to get away from the Nazis, and wrote that quote during WW2. In that context what he is saying makes perfect sense. You can't reason with people who prefer shooting you over being convinced by you.
To recommend thrift to the poor is both grotesque and insulting. It is like advising a man who is starving to eat less.

-Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man under Socialism







Post#7883 at 03-21-2012 01:44 PM by Odin [at Moorhead, MN, USA joined Sep 2006 #posts 14,442]
---
03-21-2012, 01:44 PM #7883
Join Date
Sep 2006
Location
Moorhead, MN, USA
Posts
14,442

Quote Originally Posted by Wallace 88 View Post
What lies? The rapes and murders at occupy rallies is documented.
With how many people were at Zuccotti Park for so long it would be miraculous if there were no incidences of violent crimes, it has nothing to do with Occupy itself and to claim so is fallacious.
To recommend thrift to the poor is both grotesque and insulting. It is like advising a man who is starving to eat less.

-Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man under Socialism







Post#7884 at 03-21-2012 02:39 PM by pbrower2a [at "Michigrim" joined May 2005 #posts 15,014]
---
03-21-2012, 02:39 PM #7884
Join Date
May 2005
Location
"Michigrim"
Posts
15,014

Quote Originally Posted by KaiserD2 View Post
Exit polls show 98% of voters in the Republican Illinois primary were white and 17% (sic) were under 40. The Republicans are in big trouble come November.
Illinois is one of the Bluest of states... "Under 40" means "born 1972 or later". About half of those should be Generation X, so if the GOP is having trouble with Generation X it will be in deep trouble in places other than Illinois. Republicans can't yet excite people outside the Base to find an alternative to president Obama. Time is running out for that.
The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid "dens of crime" (or) even in concentration camps and labour camps. In those we see its final result. But it is conceived and ordered... in clean, carpeted, warmed and well-lighted offices, by (those) who do not need to raise their voices. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern."


― C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters







Post#7885 at 03-21-2012 02:49 PM by Wallace 88 [at joined Dec 2010 #posts 1,232]
---
03-21-2012, 02:49 PM #7885
Join Date
Dec 2010
Posts
1,232

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
With how many people were at Zuccotti Park for so long it would be miraculous if there were no incidences of violent crimes, it has nothing to do with Occupy itself and to claim so is fallacious.
How many people were at Zuccotti Park? And they were not there that long. And compare to an average community of theat size. And compare to Tea Baggers. You are a cop out.







Post#7886 at 03-21-2012 02:50 PM by Wallace 88 [at joined Dec 2010 #posts 1,232]
---
03-21-2012, 02:50 PM #7886
Join Date
Dec 2010
Posts
1,232

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
Remember that Popper, who was of Jewish background, left his Native Austria to get away from the Nazis, and wrote that quote during WW2. In that context what he is saying makes perfect sense. You can't reason with people who prefer shooting you over being convinced by you.
You seem to be the only one here taliking about shootimng people.







Post#7887 at 03-21-2012 02:53 PM by Lady Vagina [at California joined Jul 2011 #posts 131]
---
03-21-2012, 02:53 PM #7887
Join Date
Jul 2011
Location
California
Posts
131

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.

-Karl Popper

The American Right with it's hate radio qualifies at the moment.



Breitbart's death was certainly a tragedy for his family, but I cannot personally feel sorry for his death.
I do not even care that much for his family. Have they disowned him?







Post#7888 at 03-21-2012 02:55 PM by Wallace 88 [at joined Dec 2010 #posts 1,232]
---
03-21-2012, 02:55 PM #7888
Join Date
Dec 2010
Posts
1,232

Quote Originally Posted by Lady Vagina View Post
I do not even care that much for his family. Have they disowned him?
As for Odin being the most hateful and bigoted person on the board. I stand corrected.







Post#7889 at 03-21-2012 03:26 PM by Justin '77 [at Meh. joined Sep 2001 #posts 12,182]
---
03-21-2012, 03:26 PM #7889
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Meh.
Posts
12,182

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
Remember that Popper, who was of Jewish background, left his Native Austria to get away from the Nazis, and wrote that quote during WW2. In that context what he is saying makes perfect sense. You can't reason with people who prefer shooting you over being convinced by you.
He's not talking about being unable to reason with people who shoot instead of reasoning. He's talking about shooting people who talk about (that is, engage in the primary mode we humans have of social reasoning) doing stuff he doesn't like.

No context on earth can make such a thing any less monstrous to propose.
"Qu'est-ce que c'est que cela, la loi ? On peut donc être dehors. Je ne comprends pas. Quant à moi, suis-je dans la loi ? suis-je hors la loi ? Je n'en sais rien. Mourir de faim, est-ce être dans la loi ?" -- Tellmarch

"Человек не может снять с себя ответственности за свои поступки." - L. Tolstoy

"[it]
is no doubt obvious, the cult of the experts is both self-serving, for those who propound it, and fraudulent." - Noam Chomsky







Post#7890 at 03-21-2012 04:43 PM by Eric the Green [at San Jose CA joined Jul 2001 #posts 22,504]
---
03-21-2012, 04:43 PM #7890
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
San Jose CA
Posts
22,504

Inspiring video!


http://youtu.be/l11ZLzIck_8

Last edited by Eric the Green; 03-21-2012 at 04:49 PM.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive,

Eric A. Meece







Post#7891 at 03-21-2012 08:02 PM by Odin [at Moorhead, MN, USA joined Sep 2006 #posts 14,442]
---
03-21-2012, 08:02 PM #7891
Join Date
Sep 2006
Location
Moorhead, MN, USA
Posts
14,442

Quote Originally Posted by Lady Vagina View Post
I do not even care that much for his family. Have they disowned him?
Well that was uncalled for. People can be decent parents even if they are douchebags in public.
To recommend thrift to the poor is both grotesque and insulting. It is like advising a man who is starving to eat less.

-Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man under Socialism







Post#7892 at 03-21-2012 08:11 PM by Odin [at Moorhead, MN, USA joined Sep 2006 #posts 14,442]
---
03-21-2012, 08:11 PM #7892
Join Date
Sep 2006
Location
Moorhead, MN, USA
Posts
14,442

Quote Originally Posted by Justin '77 View Post
He's not talking about being unable to reason with people who shoot instead of reasoning. He's talking about shooting people who talk about (that is, engage in the primary mode we humans have of social reasoning) doing stuff he doesn't like.

No context on earth can make such a thing any less monstrous to propose.
Something like Germany banning Neo-Nazi groups and their associated symbols is shooting people?
To recommend thrift to the poor is both grotesque and insulting. It is like advising a man who is starving to eat less.

-Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man under Socialism







Post#7893 at 03-21-2012 08:35 PM by Odin [at Moorhead, MN, USA joined Sep 2006 #posts 14,442]
---
03-21-2012, 08:35 PM #7893
Join Date
Sep 2006
Location
Moorhead, MN, USA
Posts
14,442

............
To recommend thrift to the poor is both grotesque and insulting. It is like advising a man who is starving to eat less.

-Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man under Socialism







Post#7894 at 03-21-2012 09:31 PM by Marx & Lennon [at '47 cohort still lost in Falwelland joined Sep 2001 #posts 16,709]
---
03-21-2012, 09:31 PM #7894
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
'47 cohort still lost in Falwelland
Posts
16,709

Quote Originally Posted by Justin '77 View Post
He's not talking about being unable to reason with people who shoot instead of reasoning. He's talking about shooting people who talk about (that is, engage in the primary mode we humans have of social reasoning) doing stuff he doesn't like.

No context on earth can make such a thing any less monstrous to propose.
No, Popper is arguing that there are times when taking violent action is the less violent alternative. That is very different from your take or Odin's. It's not a line I want to draw, but it's one that obviously exists. Would you hesitate to shoot a an enraged maniac with a nuclear weapon and way to detonate it, who was getting ready to do just that? Now, take the maniac away and replace him/her with a delusional 8 year old. Could you still save the world?
Marx: Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.
Lennon: You either get tired fighting for peace, or you die.







Post#7895 at 03-21-2012 11:34 PM by radind [at Alabama joined Sep 2009 #posts 1,595]
---
03-21-2012, 11:34 PM #7895
Join Date
Sep 2009
Location
Alabama
Posts
1,595

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.

-Karl Popper

The American Right with it's hate radio qualifies at the moment.



Breitbart's death was certainly a tragedy for his family, but I cannot personally feel sorry for his death.
It is good to put Popper in perspective.

Karl Popper (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

http://stanford.library.usyd.edu.au/entries/popper/

..."he was appalled by the failure of the democratic parties to stem the rising tide of fascism in his native Austria in the 1920s and 1930s, and the effective welcome extended to it by the Marxists. The latter acted on the ideological grounds that it constituted what they believed to be a necessary dialectical step towards the implosion of capitalism and the ultimate revolutionary victory of communism. This was one factor which led to the much feared Anschluss, the annexation of Austria by the German Reich, the anticipation of which forced Popper into permanent exile from his native country. The Poverty of Historicism (1944) and The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945), his most impassioned and brilliant social works, are as a consequence a powerful defence of democratic liberalism as a social and political philosophy, and a devastating critique of the principal philosophical presuppositions underpinning all forms of totalitarianism."...







Post#7896 at 03-22-2012 12:13 AM by B Butler [at joined Nov 2011 #posts 2,329]
---
03-22-2012, 12:13 AM #7896
Join Date
Nov 2011
Posts
2,329

Left Arrow Political Spam Wars?

Then there is silliness. It seems some political advocates are trying to use spam mechanisms to silence opponents on Facebook. If one 'likes' a page, one can label any comment attached to the page as spam. To members of one party, any comment favoring the views of the other party seems to look like spam.

Facebook is looking into it, allegedly. Their spokesman thinks Facebook would be a better social service if the above is squashed.

From C-net: Democrat: Republicans got me banned on Facebook

Is this what people think intelligent discourse is made of?

Of course, there is no real evidence that Republicans did it. This was just an assumption on the part of the accused spammer.

Bob Butler 54
Last edited by B Butler; 03-22-2012 at 12:15 AM.







Post#7897 at 03-22-2012 09:24 AM by Justin '77 [at Meh. joined Sep 2001 #posts 12,182]
---
03-22-2012, 09:24 AM #7897
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Meh.
Posts
12,182

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
Something like Germany banning Neo-Nazi groups and their associated symbols is shooting people?
"we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force"


Do you not get what that means? I mean, it's right there...

Yes, 'banning' via the gun-wielding organs of force-application is precisely 'shooting people'. Or hanging them or beating them to death or hacking them apart with machetes or just injecting poison into their veins or lungs. That's what force in a social context is -- the act or credible threat of turning a person into an object.
"Qu'est-ce que c'est que cela, la loi ? On peut donc être dehors. Je ne comprends pas. Quant à moi, suis-je dans la loi ? suis-je hors la loi ? Je n'en sais rien. Mourir de faim, est-ce être dans la loi ?" -- Tellmarch

"Человек не может снять с себя ответственности за свои поступки." - L. Tolstoy

"[it]
is no doubt obvious, the cult of the experts is both self-serving, for those who propound it, and fraudulent." - Noam Chomsky







Post#7898 at 03-22-2012 05:46 PM by Brian Rush [at California joined Jul 2001 #posts 12,392]
---
03-22-2012, 05:46 PM #7898
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
California
Posts
12,392

I'm in agreement with Justin on this one. My only hesitation is that I've never stood in those shoes; my feeling, though, is that while I can understand Popper's wrath and willingness to cross acceptable lines on this matter, much as I can understand the victim of a violent rape wanting to castrate all men, that doesn't make it right. I have never been entirely comfortable with Germany's banning of Nazis, either. It's not even a good justification to point to German history, since the Weimar Republic had provisions (notably the president's authority to give emergency powers to the chancellor, which is how the Nazi government -- originally republican -- was converted into a dictatorship) that was just asking for something bloody awful to happen, and the Bundesrepublik does not have those provisions. If a Nazi Party were to be resurgent in Germany, the most it could accomplish under current law would be to become the elected government under the Constitution, as Hitler did in the 1933 election, and could not become a totalitarian state as Nazi Germany was after the Reichstag fire. While even that would be a lamentable event, it would not be a catastrophe justifying totalitarian methods (which the outlawing of a political party constitutes) to stop it.
"And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Bethlehem to be born?"

My blog: https://brianrushwriter.wordpress.com/

The Order Master (volume one of Refuge), a science fantasy. Amazon link: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00GZZWEAS
Smashwords link: https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/382903







Post#7899 at 03-22-2012 09:31 PM by KaiserD2 [at David Kaiser '47 joined Jul 2001 #posts 5,220]
---
03-22-2012, 09:31 PM #7899
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
David Kaiser '47
Posts
5,220

Rick Santorum has suggested that it might be better to stick with Obama than to elect "etch-a-sketch" Mitt Romney. He represents the worst of his generation: totally narcissistic and without any loyalty to anything but himself. It makes me sick that people like this can build up moral credit by claiming to be very religious.







Post#7900 at 03-23-2012 06:24 PM by Lady Vagina [at California joined Jul 2011 #posts 131]
---
03-23-2012, 06:24 PM #7900
Join Date
Jul 2011
Location
California
Posts
131

Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Green View Post
Inspiring video!


http://youtu.be/l11ZLzIck_8

Democratic party propaganda.


Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
Well that was uncalled for. People can be decent parents even if they are douchebags in public.
Have they disowned the douchebag, Odin?
-----------------------------------------