Originally Posted by
Marx & Lennon
Well, that's a big "if". We may be making enemies and solidifying friednships, but we'll never be a full party to what goes on. 99% of that is classified by all parties concerned.
Public face is not intended as the policy face. All that gets handled in private.
It does come down to faith with those "in the know” and that does make me uncomfortable. However, I can put that faith in Obama; never could with Bush (even with Colin Powell).
It's the context.
It appears he wants to lower our aggressive stance - even drone attacks are less, much less, aggressive than boots on the ground.
He also is resisting the insanity of attacking Iran by either us or Israel. And he's being measured in his responses to Syria. Same with Libya during the rebellion against Gaddafi and with the more recent Benghazi incident.
Any doubt that these would be completely different with a different trajectory of our involvement and violence should the NeoCons be back n charge? Any doubt about that after witnessing Romney's reaction to Benghazi? Romney was obviously a sock puppet for the NeoCons; God help us if he had won the election.
People who don't get this are completely clueless, not only with what is going on in the world at large but also with extremely different vying political forces within their own country. There is a real difference and it is huge --- including in terms of human life.
"The Devil enters the prompter's box and the play is ready to start" - R. Service
“It’s not tax money. The banks have accounts with the Fed … so, to lend to a bank, we simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account that they have with the Fed. It’s much more akin to printing money.” - B.Bernanke
"Keep your filthy hands off my guns while I decide what you can & can't do with your uterus" - Sarah Silverman
If you meet a magic pony on the road, kill it. - Playwrite