Generational Dynamics
Fourth Turning Forum Archive


Popular links:
Generational Dynamics Web Site
Generational Dynamics Forum
Fourth Turning Archive home page
New Fourth Turning Forum

Thread: The Cycle of Civilization - Page 6







Post#126 at 08-31-2011 09:11 AM by The Grey Badger [at Albuquerque, NM joined Sep 2001 #posts 8,876]
---
08-31-2011, 09:11 AM #126
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Posts
8,876

Quote Originally Posted by millennialX View Post
I wonder how many women I'm going to see at the comic book store, tonight at 12:01am for the launch of the rebooted DC universe. Probably a lot.
It's been a private joke with me for years, how many of the adolescent males the producers insist are Star Trek's core audience, are now past menopause. And we have written the vast majority of fanfic, too - started the practice, in fact.
How to spot a shill, by John Michael Greer: "What you watch for is (a) a brand new commenter who (b) has nothing to say about the topic under discussion but (c) trots out a smoothly written opinion piece that (d) hits all the standard talking points currently being used by a specific political or corporate interest, while (e) avoiding any other points anyone else has made on that subject."

"If the shoe fits..." The Grey Badger.







Post#127 at 08-31-2011 09:13 AM by The Grey Badger [at Albuquerque, NM joined Sep 2001 #posts 8,876]
---
08-31-2011, 09:13 AM #127
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Posts
8,876

Quote Originally Posted by Child of Socrates View Post
I believe that to be the case. I married a fellow geek.
<G>! My friend Tanley says of her husband Duke (they met at an sf convention and have been going to them together for decades) "He has the body of a geek god." Tanley runs filking (sf-related singalongs) and Duke runs sound and video for the convention and for the club when needed.

I sometimes run for the bar when the movie is being shown. Our Tribe has the sort of sense of irony that likes the truly bad ones
How to spot a shill, by John Michael Greer: "What you watch for is (a) a brand new commenter who (b) has nothing to say about the topic under discussion but (c) trots out a smoothly written opinion piece that (d) hits all the standard talking points currently being used by a specific political or corporate interest, while (e) avoiding any other points anyone else has made on that subject."

"If the shoe fits..." The Grey Badger.







Post#128 at 08-31-2011 09:15 AM by The Grey Badger [at Albuquerque, NM joined Sep 2001 #posts 8,876]
---
08-31-2011, 09:15 AM #128
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Posts
8,876

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
I have pointed that out myself and it annoys the Hell out of me. I think you can tell when a philosophical position has "gone mainstream" if it is used by Social Conservatives without they themselves realizing it, LOL
"People who claim to be plain folks of action and common sense are generally parroting some long-dead philosopher they never heard of, and writings they never read." No attribution because so many different people have said this in so many different ways, that if you know the original, go ahead and post it here. But it is so true!
How to spot a shill, by John Michael Greer: "What you watch for is (a) a brand new commenter who (b) has nothing to say about the topic under discussion but (c) trots out a smoothly written opinion piece that (d) hits all the standard talking points currently being used by a specific political or corporate interest, while (e) avoiding any other points anyone else has made on that subject."

"If the shoe fits..." The Grey Badger.







Post#129 at 08-31-2011 09:16 AM by The Grey Badger [at Albuquerque, NM joined Sep 2001 #posts 8,876]
---
08-31-2011, 09:16 AM #129
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Posts
8,876

Quote Originally Posted by Odin View Post
Why do you think most of my relationships have been with geeky gals?
Good for you!
How to spot a shill, by John Michael Greer: "What you watch for is (a) a brand new commenter who (b) has nothing to say about the topic under discussion but (c) trots out a smoothly written opinion piece that (d) hits all the standard talking points currently being used by a specific political or corporate interest, while (e) avoiding any other points anyone else has made on that subject."

"If the shoe fits..." The Grey Badger.







Post#130 at 08-31-2011 09:32 AM by millennialX [at Gotham City, USA joined Oct 2010 #posts 6,597]
---
08-31-2011, 09:32 AM #130
Join Date
Oct 2010
Location
Gotham City, USA
Posts
6,597

Quote Originally Posted by The Grey Badger View Post
Good for you!
By the way, I attended a special mid night release party (at a comic shop) for the release of new DC comics and pretty much every geek, had a very attractive (and geeky) young lady with them. Some of the women even wore Superman shirts.
Born in 1981 and INFJ Gen Yer







Post#131 at 08-31-2011 09:37 AM by pizal81 [at China joined May 2010 #posts 2,392]
---
08-31-2011, 09:37 AM #131
Join Date
May 2010
Location
China
Posts
2,392

Quote Originally Posted by millennialX View Post
By the way, I attended a special mid night release party (at a comic shop) for the release of new DC comics and pretty much every geek, had a very attractive (and geeky) young lady with them. Some of the women even wore Superman shirts.
Were you in the twilight zone?







Post#132 at 08-31-2011 10:15 AM by millennialX [at Gotham City, USA joined Oct 2010 #posts 6,597]
---
08-31-2011, 10:15 AM #132
Join Date
Oct 2010
Location
Gotham City, USA
Posts
6,597

Quote Originally Posted by pizal81 View Post
Were you in the twilight zone?
Sort off....but at the same time, it's still my geeky zone. What made it weird was the fact that we were all out at mid night, at a store that closes by 5pm.
Born in 1981 and INFJ Gen Yer







Post#133 at 08-31-2011 10:19 AM by pizal81 [at China joined May 2010 #posts 2,392]
---
08-31-2011, 10:19 AM #133
Join Date
May 2010
Location
China
Posts
2,392

Quote Originally Posted by millennialX View Post
Sort off....but at the same time, it's still my geeky zone. What made it weird was the fact that we were all out at mid night, at a store that closes by 5pm.
When you say attractive could you put a number on it? 1 to 10 scale. haha







Post#134 at 08-31-2011 10:31 AM by pizal81 [at China joined May 2010 #posts 2,392]
---
08-31-2011, 10:31 AM #134
Join Date
May 2010
Location
China
Posts
2,392

Quote Originally Posted by The Grey Badger View Post
"People who claim to be plain folks of action and common sense are generally parroting some long-dead philosopher they never heard of, and writings they never read." No attribution because so many different people have said this in so many different ways, that if you know the original, go ahead and post it here. But it is so true!
They could have came up with the idea themselves. Not everything is a derived from something else. I mean children say things that are in philosophy they hadn't heard from anybody. They just figured it out for themselves.

As for the right being master's of their own destiny, I don't think they are presuppose a postmodern world view to get even if it is similar. I have hard time thinking a lot of today's Republicans have a cohesive belief system of any sort that doesn't contradict itself.







Post#135 at 08-31-2011 01:47 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
08-31-2011, 01:47 PM #135
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

Geeks of both genders may have have similar interests, but what does a male jock have in common with a prom queen? Or cheerleader?







Post#136 at 08-31-2011 01:49 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
08-31-2011, 01:49 PM #136
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

Perhaps the next Age will combine: aspects of the present; aspects of past eras; and novel features.







Post#137 at 08-31-2011 01:51 PM by The Grey Badger [at Albuquerque, NM joined Sep 2001 #posts 8,876]
---
08-31-2011, 01:51 PM #137
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Posts
8,876

Quote Originally Posted by TimWalker View Post
Geeks of both genders may have have similar interests, but what does a male jock have in common with a prom queen? Or cheerleader?
This. "When you say attractive could you put a number on it? 1 to 10 scale. haha "
How to spot a shill, by John Michael Greer: "What you watch for is (a) a brand new commenter who (b) has nothing to say about the topic under discussion but (c) trots out a smoothly written opinion piece that (d) hits all the standard talking points currently being used by a specific political or corporate interest, while (e) avoiding any other points anyone else has made on that subject."

"If the shoe fits..." The Grey Badger.







Post#138 at 08-31-2011 01:53 PM by ziggyX65 [at Texas Hill Country joined Apr 2010 #posts 2,634]
---
08-31-2011, 01:53 PM #138
Join Date
Apr 2010
Location
Texas Hill Country
Posts
2,634

Quote Originally Posted by TimWalker View Post
Geeks of both genders may have have similar interests, but what does a male jock have in common with a prom queen? Or cheerleader?
At the high school level, the ability to act superior and think you have "special" social status? Having said that, the most wonderful kids I remember growing up with in high school were the football players and cheerleaders who were genuinely nice people and not stuck up because of their position. I just wished there were more of them.







Post#139 at 09-04-2011 12:51 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
09-04-2011, 12:51 PM #139
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

Hints from history - possibilities for the future: 1. Most likely would be a Universal Empire, which includes an entire civilization within one state. ( A weak but subversive version is the European Union). This would likely lead to stultification and stagnation, bringing on the stage of Decay, and eventually the stage of Invasion. 2. The next most likely possiblity would be catastrophic destruction. This may be environmental - the Anasazi culture was apparently doomed by prolonged drought. The Hittites were appently brought down by a combination of drought and invasion. Another possibility is nuclear war. 3. It is concievable that a civilization may skip the Universal Empire stage and go directly to Decay. This might be the result of constant warfare, but with no victor. Apparently something like this happened in MesoAmerica. 4. Revival of a moribund society. This seems to be a low probability - the only example that I know of is Babylon. 5. A return to Expansion (of population, turf, wealth, knowledge). At this point it seem that the only possibility is to go up. Large scale industrialization of space has been a topic of speculation. However, it is not obvious that this is imminent.







Post#140 at 09-04-2011 01:01 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
09-04-2011, 01:01 PM #140
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

Concievable is a Muddling Through secenario. Unlike Expansion, Zero Population Growth and static territory prevail, but can include an expansion of knowledge...and must include some means of prosperity. Countries may be grouped in blocs, but without going all the way to Universal Empire. There may be social/cultural change, likely growing out of Awakenings. We seem to be in a roughly comparable situation right now. As for the next great era, I imagine it being on the other side of the projected Crisis of 2100.







Post#141 at 09-04-2011 01:18 PM by Chas'88 [at In between Pennsylvania & Pennsyltucky joined Nov 2008 #posts 9,432]
---
09-04-2011, 01:18 PM #141
Join Date
Nov 2008
Location
In between Pennsylvania & Pennsyltucky
Posts
9,432

Quote Originally Posted by The Grey Badger View Post
It's been a private joke with me for years, how many of the adolescent males the producers insist are Star Trek's core audience, are now past menopause. And we have written the vast majority of fanfic, too - started the practice, in fact.
I'm sure you were there when the original Mary Sue was born, and cringed at it.

~Chas'88
"There have always been people who say: "The war will be over someday." I say there's no guarantee the war will ever be over. Naturally a brief intermission is conceivable. Maybe the war needs a breather, a war can even break its neck, so to speak. But the kings and emperors, not to mention the pope, will always come to its help in adversity. ON the whole, I'd say this war has very little to worry about, it'll live to a ripe old age."







Post#142 at 09-05-2011 12:33 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
09-05-2011, 12:33 PM #142
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

Regarding China's golden ages:Wikilpedia listed the years for the following dynasties: Tang - 618 to 907. Ming - 1368 to 1644. I find it interesting that a civilization could, after a period of centuries, experience a second high point. The two different periods seem to have substantial differences in character. Of course, we might not necessarily enjoy a second high point, but history indicates that it is a possibility.
Last edited by TimWalker; 09-05-2011 at 01:10 PM.







Post#143 at 09-05-2011 05:15 PM by The Grey Badger [at Albuquerque, NM joined Sep 2001 #posts 8,876]
---
09-05-2011, 05:15 PM #143
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Posts
8,876

Quote Originally Posted by TimWalker View Post
Regarding China's golden ages:Wikilpedia listed the years for the following dynasties: Tang - 618 to 907. Ming - 1368 to 1644. I find it interesting that a civilization could, after a period of centuries, experience a second high point. The two different periods seem to have substantial differences in character. Of course, we might not necessarily enjoy a second high point, but history indicates that it is a possibility.
700 years. That doesn't sound like the same civilization hitting two high points; that sounds like, frex, the Renaissance following the period around 1000 when early medieval gave way to high medieval on our own timeline.
How to spot a shill, by John Michael Greer: "What you watch for is (a) a brand new commenter who (b) has nothing to say about the topic under discussion but (c) trots out a smoothly written opinion piece that (d) hits all the standard talking points currently being used by a specific political or corporate interest, while (e) avoiding any other points anyone else has made on that subject."

"If the shoe fits..." The Grey Badger.







Post#144 at 09-05-2011 07:18 PM by The Wonkette [at Arlington, VA 1956 joined Jul 2002 #posts 9,209]
---
09-05-2011, 07:18 PM #144
Join Date
Jul 2002
Location
Arlington, VA 1956
Posts
9,209

Quote Originally Posted by The Grey Badger View Post
700 years. That doesn't sound like the same civilization hitting two high points; that sounds like, frex, the Renaissance following the period around 1000 when early medieval gave way to high medieval on our own timeline.
More like 460 years from the end of one high point to the beginning of the next one. That would be about 20 turnings or 5 saeculi.
I want people to know that peace is possible even in this stupid day and age. Prem Rawat, June 8, 2008







Post#145 at 09-05-2011 07:55 PM by The Grey Badger [at Albuquerque, NM joined Sep 2001 #posts 8,876]
---
09-05-2011, 07:55 PM #145
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Posts
8,876

Quote Originally Posted by The Wonkette View Post
More like 460 years from the end of one high point to the beginning of the next one. That would be about 20 turnings or 5 saeculi.
Right. One MegaSaeculum.
How to spot a shill, by John Michael Greer: "What you watch for is (a) a brand new commenter who (b) has nothing to say about the topic under discussion but (c) trots out a smoothly written opinion piece that (d) hits all the standard talking points currently being used by a specific political or corporate interest, while (e) avoiding any other points anyone else has made on that subject."

"If the shoe fits..." The Grey Badger.







Post#146 at 09-05-2011 08:30 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
09-05-2011, 08:30 PM #146
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

So...if this 4T is an Unraveling 4T, does that mean that the next 4T will be a Mega-Crisis?
Last edited by TimWalker; 09-05-2011 at 09:14 PM.







Post#147 at 09-05-2011 08:34 PM by millennialX [at Gotham City, USA joined Oct 2010 #posts 6,597]
---
09-05-2011, 08:34 PM #147
Join Date
Oct 2010
Location
Gotham City, USA
Posts
6,597

Quote Originally Posted by TimWalker View Post
So the Millenial Saeculum has been located in The Interregnum. So...if this 4T is an Unraveling 4T, does that mean that the next 4T will be a Mega-Crisis?
Wow...the end all that end all. Why does this sound like "The Lord of the Rings?"

What's another example of mega unraveling 4T? The Glorious?
Born in 1981 and INFJ Gen Yer







Post#148 at 09-05-2011 08:44 PM by pizal81 [at China joined May 2010 #posts 2,392]
---
09-05-2011, 08:44 PM #148
Join Date
May 2010
Location
China
Posts
2,392

Quote Originally Posted by TimWalker View Post
Regarding China's golden ages:Wikilpedia listed the years for the following dynasties: Tang - 618 to 907. Ming - 1368 to 1644. I find it interesting that a civilization could, after a period of centuries, experience a second high point. The two different periods seem to have substantial differences in character. Of course, we might not necessarily enjoy a second high point, but history indicates that it is a possibility.
There is no rule that says we have to decline. We will have to adapt though if we are not going to decline.







Post#149 at 09-05-2011 08:57 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
09-05-2011, 08:57 PM #149
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

Quote Originally Posted by pizal81 View Post
There is no rule that says we have to decline. We will have to adapt though if we are not going to decline.
We may be forced to decide between what is crucial...and what we must drop or walk away from.
Last edited by TimWalker; 09-05-2011 at 09:15 PM.







Post#150 at 09-05-2011 09:56 PM by The Grey Badger [at Albuquerque, NM joined Sep 2001 #posts 8,876]
---
09-05-2011, 09:56 PM #150
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Posts
8,876

Quote Originally Posted by TimWalker View Post
So...if this 4T is an Unraveling 4T, does that mean that the next 4T will be a Mega-Crisis?
That's my take on it.
How to spot a shill, by John Michael Greer: "What you watch for is (a) a brand new commenter who (b) has nothing to say about the topic under discussion but (c) trots out a smoothly written opinion piece that (d) hits all the standard talking points currently being used by a specific political or corporate interest, while (e) avoiding any other points anyone else has made on that subject."

"If the shoe fits..." The Grey Badger.
-----------------------------------------