Generational Dynamics
Fourth Turning Forum Archive


Popular links:
Generational Dynamics Web Site
Generational Dynamics Forum
Fourth Turning Archive home page
New Fourth Turning Forum

Thread: The Greatest Cycle-Rebirth Of A Civilization - Page 24







Post#576 at 10-31-2013 07:07 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
10-31-2013, 07:07 PM #576
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

Quote Originally Posted by Tim Walker '56 View Post
As listed by Carroll Quigley:

1. Mixture 6000-5000 B.C.

2. Gestation 5000-4500

3. Expansion 4500-2500

4. Conflict 2500-800

5. Universal Empire: a. Core 1700-1650 b. Whole Civilization 725-450

6. Decay 450-350

7. Invasion 350-200


The "Core" empire listed above was that of Hammurabi. Like that of Alexander the Great, Hammurabi's empire began to fall apart with his death. The Kassites took over, and the long division between Babylon and Assyria began.
Time for review.







Post#577 at 11-01-2013 02:07 AM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
11-01-2013, 02:07 AM #577
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

The "Core" empire (Hammurabi's) is associated the paleo-Gilded Age. Actually, this can be considered the beginnings of Decay. The Dominant Minority, however, was eclipsed by a new ruling group, the Kassites, who chose to rule well, rather than run the country into the ground.
Last edited by TimWalker; 11-01-2013 at 02:50 AM.







Post#578 at 11-01-2013 02:16 AM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
11-01-2013, 02:16 AM #578
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

The author chose to blame Babylon's problems on a fragmentation due to the presence of foreign groups. However, his descriptions were similar to Turchin's description of the Roman Empire-an atomized society (if "society" is the right term) in which internal trust has broken down, because of a Dominant Minority. " From now on came an era of privatization and outsourcing ...there would be no such thing as society, just individual men and women and families, some wealthy, some poor,some weak, some powerful."
Last edited by TimWalker; 11-01-2013 at 02:29 AM.







Post#579 at 11-22-2013 03:18 AM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
11-22-2013, 03:18 AM #579
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

BTW, the author described Babylon as a highly conservative society. There were some minor cultural innovations. There was something of a religious revival. But overall, conserving the past was the emphasis.
Last edited by TimWalker; 11-22-2013 at 04:04 PM.







Post#580 at 12-19-2013 01:02 AM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
12-19-2013, 01:02 AM #580
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

What might have been..... The Ruin of the Roman Empire The Emperor Who Brought It Down, The Barbarians Who Could Have Saved It by James J. O'Donnell. Refers to Emperor Justinian in Constantinople. In regards to Persia: "First, he should have made peace at the eastern frontier on a basis of agreed spheres of influence and a common interest in trade.....Second, if it was venturesome for Justinian to imagine establishing warmer relationships with the shah of Persia, it was far less difficult to think of building a diplomatically successful future with the monarchs of the western Mediterranean. By Justinian's time, a rational apportionment of lands had created stable rulers in Spain, Gaul, Italy, and Africa. For them to enter or cement a partnership with Constantinople could, would, and should have linked afresh the old territories of the Roman empire in a unity that would have been far stronger, with its distributed centers, than the overstretched and incoherent territorial unity of classical antiquity......"
Last edited by TimWalker; 12-19-2013 at 01:33 AM.







Post#581 at 12-20-2013 01:20 AM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
12-20-2013, 01:20 AM #581
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

Ruin..... Author discussed Romanization of the barbarians, and the Roman like nature of their regimes. So...could there have been an Association of Quasi-Roman Regimes?
Last edited by TimWalker; 02-24-2014 at 11:37 PM.







Post#582 at 12-24-2013 03:11 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
12-24-2013, 03:11 PM #582
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

Ruin..... The author compared the "barbarian" descendants in Italy to modern Israelis, and said Franks had a "Tex-Mex" flavor.







Post#583 at 12-24-2013 06:16 PM by The Grey Badger [at Albuquerque, NM joined Sep 2001 #posts 8,876]
---
12-24-2013, 06:16 PM #583
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
Albuquerque, NM
Posts
8,876

Quote Originally Posted by TimWalker View Post
Ruin..... The author compared the "barbarian" descendants in Italy to modern Israelis, and said Franks had a "Tex-Mex" flavor.
Charlemagne's Chile Rellenos. Merovingian menudo ... the mind reels.
How to spot a shill, by John Michael Greer: "What you watch for is (a) a brand new commenter who (b) has nothing to say about the topic under discussion but (c) trots out a smoothly written opinion piece that (d) hits all the standard talking points currently being used by a specific political or corporate interest, while (e) avoiding any other points anyone else has made on that subject."

"If the shoe fits..." The Grey Badger.







Post#584 at 01-22-2014 04:49 PM by Deb C [at joined Aug 2004 #posts 6,099]
---
01-22-2014, 04:49 PM #584
Join Date
Aug 2004
Posts
6,099

Quote Originally Posted by TimWalker View Post
Thinking about where we are at...... Socially we seem to be in a time similar to the Hellenistic Age. The beginning of which was an expansive time for the ancient Greeks. But we also seem to be sliding into a period of decline similar to the "Middle Kingdom" of the Hittites. Which fits with us being in a Crap Sack crisis.

We seem to be a long way from a Renaissance.

Maybe the next saeculum will play out as a Crap Sack saeculum.
Perhaps, considering the world wide contribution to global warming, we may be edging toward a point of no return.
"The only Good America is a Just America." .... pbrower2a







Post#585 at 01-22-2014 10:26 PM by Eric the Green [at San Jose CA joined Jul 2001 #posts 22,504]
---
01-22-2014, 10:26 PM #585
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
San Jose CA
Posts
22,504

Quote Originally Posted by TimWalker View Post
Thinking about where we are at...... Socially we seem to be in a time similar to the Hellenistic Age. The beginning of which was an expansive time for the ancient Greeks. But we also seem to be sliding into a period of decline similar to the "Middle Kingdom" of the Hittites. Which fits with us being in a Crap Sack crisis.

We seem to be a long way from a Renaissance.
That's where we are though; if people would awaken to that fact, as they did in the 2T, and as some continued to be in the 3T. The typical attitudes of people on forums like this, though, shows no awareness of the possibilities that exist today for a renaissance.
Maybe the next saeculum will play out as a Crap Sack saeculum.
If it does, it will be solely because we did not take advantage of the opportunity that existed (and still exists) to create a golden age. Certainly Americans are more held back than other peoples; a renaissance is more likely in other lands now, until the red states are no longer able to hold us back with such retrograde attitudes. A handcuffed president cannot lead a nation out of the crap sack; no matter what you may think of his lack-lustre performance, it's mostly because he has no support from his people.

I do think our age is like the hellenistic; that's a well-known opinion among historians. Where we are exactly might vary, according to which cycle you buy into. As I see it, we are at about the time of Augustus or Tiberius and the time of Christ. Others might see us at over 100 years before that. Cynics who don't have access to the cyclic info might think it's much later than that. But that means the best we can hope for might be something like the golden age that Rome had; some good achievements, but certainly not the paradisical age of aquarius a lot of us new agers hoped for.

The possibilities of a new global society are interesting, though. No people has ever had so much access to all the inspired works of humanity's entire past and present worldwide, nor so many tools for life and creativity. But we just seem unable to catch enough inspiration to make it seem like a renaissance is happening. Instead, it appears only in fringe subcultures. But, considering the size of our population, maybe a small portion of today's folks would equal a much larger portion of creative folks active in past golden ages. Expecting the whole society to be in a new renaissance, is probably a vain hope in our mass commercial society. Most people focus on all the problems, as if other times whether golden or not did not have even worse problems. They did. We are living in utopian luxury compared to our forefathers and ancestors. It's entirely an attitude problem. Gen X cynicism obviously has not helped in that regard.
Last edited by Eric the Green; 01-22-2014 at 10:35 PM.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive,

Eric A. Meece







Post#586 at 01-23-2014 10:26 PM by Eric the Green [at San Jose CA joined Jul 2001 #posts 22,504]
---
01-23-2014, 10:26 PM #586
Join Date
Jul 2001
Location
San Jose CA
Posts
22,504

Another response to Tim; to say our crisis era will fail and a "crap sack saeculum" will follow, is to ignore what I have said about the 2020s. I keep telling you guys, it's too early to give up. Demographics favor the left over the next two or three decades, and the right-wing is the source of all our problems today. They will go out of power kicking and screaming, yes; but they will go. Cosmic sources suggest a successful outcome to this 4T. Please remember that, and remember also that change will accelerate once the 2020s begin, and more so each year from now all the way to 2028. The 2010s are 1850s redux. Leaders are mediocre, as then. Neptune moving from murky Pisces into activist Aries in 2025 means the fog of confusion and unwillingness to act will end; and even the late degrees of Pisces are more activist. All the other aspects and planetary positions confirm this. Don't disregard astrology. If you do, your only possible outlook is cynicism and despair. By the mid-2020s, change will come so fast it will make your head spin. I promise!
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive,

Eric A. Meece







Post#587 at 01-23-2014 10:46 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
01-23-2014, 10:46 PM #587
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

4Ts can go very badly.
Last edited by TimWalker; 01-23-2014 at 11:42 PM.







Post#588 at 02-03-2014 05:53 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
02-03-2014, 05:53 PM #588
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

The Collapse and Recovery of the Roman Empire by Michael Grant. For Classical civilization, this was the last post-classic phasebefore disintegration. Marked by a change in political organization-the Tetrarchy. Reconsitution of the army, notably by adding calvary. Reform of coinage.
Last edited by TimWalker; 02-03-2014 at 05:56 PM.







Post#589 at 02-24-2014 06:06 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
02-24-2014, 06:06 PM #589
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

Review of the Hellenistic Age.







Post#590 at 02-24-2014 06:41 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
02-24-2014, 06:41 PM #590
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

Review of Neomedievalism:

A

B

C
Last edited by TimWalker; 02-24-2014 at 08:18 PM.







Post#591 at 03-07-2014 03:15 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
03-07-2014, 03:15 PM #591
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

As I commented on a media thread, we may anticipate that society will become at least partially virtual. Of course, there is no close historical analog.







Post#592 at 05-23-2014 02:23 AM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
05-23-2014, 02:23 AM #592
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

Came across an anthology of short stories by Poul Anderson. Included was an article he wrote: Science Fiction and History

"It seems...possible that elements from our own past will return to claim us. While technological revolutions, which have social consequences, may well be irreversible, social characteristics not immediately related to technology have always been labile....

"Some philosophers of history have maintained that it moves, or tends to move, through cycles; if events don't repeat, classes of events do.

"...Rome had its own New Age....

"Nor is it necessarily simpleminded to anticipate no new orderings of society, different in kind from any that have gone before....Instead, we have gotten changes rung on the same half-dozen or so themes...Granted, countless details of tribalism, monarchy, hierocracy, hierocracy, democracy, etc., have varied throughout history, and so has the overall mix.....

"Americans naturally tend to think the future in terms of republican government and democratic ethos. Yet theirs, the oldest continuously existing republic on Earth, has barely passed its two hundredth birthday. Republics have generally been short lived and democracies (which are not the same thing) still more so....."
Last edited by TimWalker; 05-23-2014 at 03:11 AM.







Post#593 at 05-29-2014 11:26 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
05-29-2014, 11:26 PM #593
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

A newspaper headline pointed out that it has been a century since the start of WWI (the beginning of the end of the European Age) and 70 years since D Day (the tide turning in the biggest conflaguration in history.







Post#594 at 06-10-2014 11:53 PM by Anc' Mariner [at San Dimas, California joined Feb 2014 #posts 258]
---
06-10-2014, 11:53 PM #594
Join Date
Feb 2014
Location
San Dimas, California
Posts
258

Kassites also did strange things, like free livestock en masse. They had Indian names, maybe because they came to Babylon from near Iran or Turkmenistan and it was part of their political/religious ideology somehow. They were sort of unusual, both primitivistic and highly traditionalistic.

The Hittites were also interesting, and we know much more about them. They basically built fortress cities with semi pyramid like designs. Literal fortresses, as if their whole culture was based on a siege mentality. There's a good documentary on YouTube that Jeremy Irons narrated.







Post#595 at 06-12-2014 11:40 AM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
06-12-2014, 11:40 AM #595
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

I rented the DVD about the Hittites. An interesting people. In terms of their history, our present most resembles "The Middle Kingdom" period. A time of weakness/decline. Culturally, our present resembles the Hellenistic Age.
Last edited by TimWalker; 06-12-2014 at 12:08 PM.







Post#596 at 06-12-2014 12:49 PM by Anc' Mariner [at San Dimas, California joined Feb 2014 #posts 258]
---
06-12-2014, 12:49 PM #596
Join Date
Feb 2014
Location
San Dimas, California
Posts
258

Quote Originally Posted by TimWalker View Post
I rented the DVD about the Hittites. An interesting people. In terms of their history, our present most resembles "The Middle Kingdom" period. A time of weakness/decline. Culturally, our present resembles the Hellenistic Age.
Hmm, interesting comparison. Alexander the Two Horned, Dhul Karnein. The Muslims say he was a believer, or at least that Allah gave him leave to conquer the east and the west. His wall is said to be the Caspian Gate.

But Alexander conquered the east only: so some people say the Two Horned was really Cyrus. Or maybe Moses (like Michaelangelo's depiction). But Moses fought wars in Africa, against the Ethiopians according to midrash.

The Afghans say Moses fought against some of their ancestors, but also that some of their ancestors were Banu Israil. But that would hint that some of their ancestors were from the nation of Imlaq or the Mulekim----whose root is linked to the tribe Ephraim in the Song of Deborah. So we come full circle.

The Hittites also have some interesting associations. Cyrus Gordon noticed some details about Abram corresponded to Hittite law. Also, the best archaeological match for Solomon's Temple is the Neo-Hittite site of Ain Dara, near Aleppo.

Time plays funny tricks. Man tries to forget the past, but the earth remembers.
Last edited by Anc' Mariner; 06-12-2014 at 01:21 PM.







Post#597 at 06-12-2014 01:26 PM by TimWalker [at joined May 2007 #posts 6,368]
---
06-12-2014, 01:26 PM #597
Join Date
May 2007
Posts
6,368

On the other hand, it has occurred to me that society might morph into an unprecedented variant, due to modern technology. In fact, as mentioned on the technology thread, we seem to be off cycle because of the 1880-1930 Accelerando.







Post#598 at 06-12-2014 01:52 PM by Anc' Mariner [at San Dimas, California joined Feb 2014 #posts 258]
---
06-12-2014, 01:52 PM #598
Join Date
Feb 2014
Location
San Dimas, California
Posts
258

Quote Originally Posted by TimWalker View Post
On the other hand, it has occurred to me that society might morph into an unprecedented variant, due to modern technology. In fact, as mentioned on the technology thread, we seem to be off cycle because of the 1880-1930 Accelerando.
The Western powers that be are scared senseless of social changes from new technology. Genomic tech in particular. Info tech (capacity for something more like a hive mind) is feared by the masses.

Both fears are pointless, because both tech advances are here to stay. They will blossom in time. Whether one faction or another harnesses and develops the full potential is their choice. The early birds get the worm.

Then there is drone tech. Hmm. Tech is morally neutral - but to be human is to be a moral agent. Many are called, few are chosen. That's how it always is. People try to hold into the past until they can't anymore.
Last edited by Anc' Mariner; 06-12-2014 at 01:55 PM.







Post#599 at 06-12-2014 02:22 PM by Marx & Lennon [at '47 cohort still lost in Falwelland joined Sep 2001 #posts 16,709]
---
06-12-2014, 02:22 PM #599
Join Date
Sep 2001
Location
'47 cohort still lost in Falwelland
Posts
16,709

Quote Originally Posted by Anc' Mariner View Post
The Western powers that be are scared senseless of social changes from new technology. Genomic tech in particular. Info tech (capacity for something more like a hive mind) is feared by the masses.

Both fears are pointless, because both tech advances are here to stay. They will blossom in time. Whether one faction or another harnesses and develops the full potential is their choice. The early birds get the worm.

Then there is drone tech. Hmm. Tech is morally neutral - but to be human is to be a moral agent. Many are called, few are chosen. That's how it always is. People try to hold into the past until they can't anymore.
I think we may have finally crossed the Rubicon. Most technology from prior eras was immediately identifiable as a beneficial advance. No, not all tech was applauded by everyone - the Luddites being the most obvious example, but we were still well on the supply-limited side of the curve. The efficiencies were quickly absorbed, and society advanced. Can we still say that now? Even assuming that we can support the ever greater baskets of goods and services we are able to produce, can we absorb the changes as quickly as they happen? Can people really reinvent themselves several times in a lifetime, just to accommodate emerging tech? Will the concept of work even survive?

I should note that I think that technological advancements are typically a net plus, and that still is true. What we lack is a social and economic model that will work when we destroy jobs literally as fast as we create them. What will be left for humans that is uniquely ours to do? It won't be all that long before machines will be be to produce any good or service we can conceive, and even conception may become a technological product at some point. Will we simply be left to recreate and procreate? Sounds dull.
Marx: Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.
Lennon: You either get tired fighting for peace, or you die.







Post#600 at 06-12-2014 02:41 PM by Anc' Mariner [at San Dimas, California joined Feb 2014 #posts 258]
---
06-12-2014, 02:41 PM #600
Join Date
Feb 2014
Location
San Dimas, California
Posts
258

@ML: Reminds me of Jeremy Rifkin's book "The End of Work." It seems we have so much tech ability, but we don't know how to get along and really know each other. Modern life is atomistic and isolating.

If some people who think they have big differences get together and cross the Abyss - really get to know the Other they have feared so much - maybe then there is some hope. I think info tech - like a collective virtual "place" where we can see into each others' minds, with no secrets. Really see what moves the people who are different from us in ethos and moral orientation - and living together, can give a chance.

Think of your worst irreconcilable enemies. Maybe they are physically far away, but in your mind they are with you always. Maybe as inhuman figures of evil, and worse - knowing for them you might represent a collectively evil force in society. Dehumanization on both sides, colored by fear that is somehow existential.

What if you lived and worked with them, shared all your hopes and thoughts and feelings with them - including the darkest ones - what would that be like? And they would share yours. Everyone together, maybe just for a season.
Last edited by Anc' Mariner; 06-12-2014 at 02:49 PM.
-----------------------------------------